教師適性教學調整與學生數學學習成效之交互影響

Iterative and Reciprocal Predictions between Teachers' Instructional Adaptations and Students' Mathematics Learning Outcomes

張凌嘉(Chang Ling-Chia)

指導教授 ： 吳昭容

國立臺灣師範大學/教育學院/教育心理與輔導學系/博士(2021年)

https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202100613

摘要

有效能的教師依據學生個別差異進行教學調整，然而教師宜以哪些個別差異作為適性教學之依據，且隨時間依據不同個別差異之適性教學調整又如何影響學生的情意和認知成效，是當今適性教學研究亟需補足的缺口。本研究以成績、興趣和多元智能三種適性標的，反映學生於認知與情意面之學習結果、行為表現及發展潛能之個別差異，探討教師依據多元（三種）適性標的進行教學調整與學生數學學習成效之成長趨勢與交互影響。本研究採準實驗之不等組前後測設計，以方案成效評估者身分，針對108學年有無實施適性教學介入方案之實驗與對照兩組，三所國小三、四年級共31位教師和685位學生，進行教師教學調整問卷、學生學習情意問卷，與數學評量試卷之追蹤測量。應用階層線性模式（hierarchical linear model, HLM）之成長模型及偏最小平方結構方程模式（partial least squares structural equation modeling, PLS-SEM）之交互延宕縱貫模型等分析方法，三個研究問題的結果顯示：
　　（1）實施介入方案顯著提高實驗組教師適性力，教師增加依據適性標的─多元智能進行教學調整的頻率，依據適性標的─成績和興趣調整的頻率則先降後升。實驗組教師最終增加依據多元適性標的進行教學調整的頻率，對照組教師則無顯著增減。
　　（2）實驗組教師增加依據適性標的─多元智能調整的頻率、減少依據適性標的─成績調整的頻率，顯著提升實驗組學生的數學學習成就，且成長率優於對照組平均水準。實驗組教師依據低起始能力學生之適性標的進行教學調整，有助提升低起始能力學生的學習自信和學習感受，從而增進數學學習成就。
　　（3）教師增加依據適性標的進行教學調整的頻率，經過一個學年能橫斷直接且交互延宕地提升學生的數學情意成效與學習成就。教師持續增加適性教學調整的頻率時，學生學習成就呈現先降後升；較低的學習成就激發教師增加適性教學調整頻率，最終促進學生提升學習成就。當教師依據多元適性標的進行教學調整時，學生的數學情意成效與學習成就交互正向影響。
　　最後，說明本研究對適性教學研究於量化工具和縱貫實證研究方面之貢獻，並提出「適性－情意－成就模型」代表教師適性教學循環、學生學習迭代成長、師生認知情意交互影響之有效教與學動態系統，作為推動融合教育政策、適性教學介入、教師專業發展與師資培育等教育機關學校之參考。

關鍵字

適性教學 ； 教學調整 ； 適性標的 ； 階層線性成長模式 ； 交互延宕縱貫模型 ； 適性－情意－成就模型

並列摘要

Effective teachers adapt their methods to students' learning differences. However, the way these instructional adaptations affect students' affective and cognitive outcomes over time has not been explored much. Three types of adaptive targets—grades, interests, and multiple intelligences—were proposed in this study to represent individual differences related to learning outcomes, behavioral expression, and developmental potential across cognitive and affective domains. The study aimed to investigate the iterative and reciprocal predictions between teachers' instructional adaptations to multiple (three) adaptive targets and students' learning outcomes in mathematics. A quasi-experimental design was chosen to evaluate the effectiveness of an adaptive teaching intervention program, and a multi-method approach was employed to repeatedly measure teachers' instructional adaptations, students' affective outcomes, and mathematics achievements. This study involved an experimental group that implemented an adaptive teaching intervention program in the 2019 school year and a control group without intervention. A total of 31 teachers and 685 students from the 3rd and 4th grade of three primary schools were involved. Hierarchical linear models with growth modeling and partial least squares structural equation modeling with cross-lagged panel design were utilized to examine three research questions. The results of this study indicated that (1) The intervention program fostered the adaptability of the experimental group teachers. Over time, they increased their frequency of instructional adaptation to the "multiple intelligences" target. Meanwhile, the frequency of instructional adaptation to "grades" and "interests" first decreased and then increased over time. Ultimately, the experimental group teachers significantly increased the frequency of instructional adaptation to multiple adaptive targets, whereas no significant differences were found in the control group teachers. (2) The experimental group students, whose teachers increased the frequency of instructional adaptation to "multiple intelligences" and decreased it to "grades," showed significantly higher growth rates of mathematical achievements compared to the control group students. Low-achieving students in the experimental group showed significantly higher growth rates of learning confidence and learning perception toward adaptive teaching, thereby increasing their growth rates of mathematical achievements. (3) The increase in frequency of instructional adaptation showed positive contemporary direct effects and longitudinal cross-lagged effects on students' affective outcomes (learning interests, learning confidence, and learning perception) and mathematical achievements throughout the school year. While teachers increased the frequency of their instructional adaptation, students' mathematical achievements declined at the end of the first semester but rose at the end of the second semester. For low-achieving students, teachers increased the frequency of instructional adaptation to multiple adaptive targets. Furthermore, this increase generated positive reciprocal effects between students' affective outcomes and mathematical achievements. In conclusion, this study makes valuable contributions to adaptive teaching research by developing quantitative instruments, providing longitudinal empirical evidence, and proposing an adaptability-affect-achievement model. The model represents a dynamic system of effective teaching and learning that consists of adaptive teaching cycles, iterative learning outcomes, and reciprocal interactions between teachers and students. Pedagogical implications for inclusive education, intervention programs, professional development, and teacher education to promote teacher adaptability and student learning outcomes are discussed.

並列關鍵字

adaptive teaching ； instructional adaptation ； adaptive targets ； hierarchical linear growth model ； cross-lagged panel model ； adaptability-affect-achievement model

參考文獻

Bock, R. D., & Mislevy, R. J. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168200600405

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Talsma, K., Schüz, B., Schwarzer, R., & Norris, K. (2018). I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.015

中文部分

王玉品、徐偉民（2009）：一位國小教師面對數學教學改革的抗拒和改變。科學教育學刊，17（3），233‒253。https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.2009.1703.02