透過您的圖書館登入
IP:44.192.247.144
  • 學位論文

水梯田聚落環境變遷回復力之研究:社會-生態理論之應用

A Study on Environmental Change Resilience of Paddy Landscapes:An Application of Socio-ecological Theory

指導教授 : 洪鴻智
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


在人類與自然過去數世紀的共演化過程中,形成了生物棲地和人類土地利用動態鑲嵌的社會生態生產地景,並可直接對應到台灣水梯田聚落。過去,臺灣稻米文化、特殊地形、地貌與人口稠密等特性下,造就許多農村皆有獨特的水梯田景觀。然隨環境變遷的擾動下,許多亦已產生嚴重陸化、休耕與廢耕現象,或轉為都市或其他產業發展用地。爰此,林務局於2009年開始執行水梯田溼地生態保存與復育計畫,結合里山倡議理念,以復育社會生態生產地景為主軸,重塑人與自然和諧的互動關係,提供台灣水梯田聚落永續發展的契機。   本研究欲透過回復力觀點,調查與分析推動里山倡議的八煙、貢寮、石梯坪三處水梯田聚落回復力運作機制,並作為制訂水梯田聚落環境變遷回復力政策之參考。透過回顧回復力、社會生態生產地景與社會生態生產地景回復力指標相關文獻,本研究制訂出水梯田聚落回復力運作機制分析架構,將其拆解為「回復力構成要素」、「動態擾動」、「利害關係人」三部分,並以回復力指標作為回復力構成要素,以捕捉水梯田聚落所具有的回復力特質。於此架構下,應用深度訪談法、文件分析法與參與觀察法。一方面,調查水梯田聚落回復力構成要素與動態擾動;另一方面,結合不同水梯田聚落推動經驗,運用回復力指標分析聚落間運作差異與回復力後續維繫關鍵,最後回饋到「水梯田聚落環境變遷回復力政策建議」與「社會生態生產地景復育政策建議」上,以達本研究之目的。

並列摘要


Humans and nature have co-evolved over centuries, creating unique mosaic socio-ecological production landscapes with habitats and human land use, and that can directly correspond to the paddy landscapes in Taiwan. In the past, the characteristics of rice culture, special topography, and densely populated in Taiwan, creating many paddy landscapes in rural area. However, with the disturbances of environmental change, many paddy landscapes have been waste, or turned into urban or industrial use. Therefore, the Forestry Bureau began to implement wetland ecosystem conservation and restoration plan in 2009, combined with the concept of Satoyama Initiative to reshape harmonious interactions between humans and nature and restore the socio-ecological production landscapes. Providing paddy landscapes in Taiwan sustainable development opportunities. This study uses the resilience perspective, investigating and assessing resilience in Bajen, Gongliao and Shihtiping paddy landscapes, and also formulate environmental change resilience policy suggestion of paddy landscapes. After reviewing literatures of resilience concept, socio-ecological production landscapes and indicators of socio-ecological production landscapes. This study makes resilience assessment framework of paddy landscapes, and divide into “resilience components”, “dynamic disturbances” and “stakeholders”. In order to capture essential of resilience, this study uses indicators of resilience to conduct resilience components. Under this framework, this study uses in-depth interview, document analysis and participant observation. On one hand, assessing resilience components and dynamic disturbances of paddy landscapes; On the other hand, combining with other paddy landscapes experiences, using indicators of resilience to analyze operation mode between different paddy landscapes and critical thresholds. Finally, feedback to the policy suggestion of environmental change resilience of paddy landscapes and socio-ecological production landscapes restoration.

參考文獻


8.塩見直紀(2006)。半農半X的生活:順從自然,實踐天賦。臺北:天下文化出版社。
6.洪鴻智、李承嘉、詹士樑、林華慶、蕭婷允、文嬿翔(2013)。水梯田濕地生態與景觀保育價值評估,臺灣土地研究,第16卷,第2期,第1-22頁。
1.Berkes, F., Colding, J. F., and Folke, C., editors (2003). Navigating nature’s dynamics: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
2.Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B. H., Anderies, J. M., Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4,765–781.
3.Chang, K. and Ying, Y. (2005). External benefits of preserving agricultural land: Taiwan’s rice fields, Social Science Journal, 42(2): 285-293.

延伸閱讀