透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.220.81.106
  • 學位論文

個人的成功歸因與社會衝突知覺之關聯

A study of association between attribution to success and perception of social conflict

指導教授 : 蔡明璋
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究以2009中研院「台灣地區社會變遷基本調查第五期第五次-社會不平等」的訪問資料為研究問卷,調查受訪者個人主觀認為社會中是否存在衝突(包含富人與窮人、勞動與中產、主管與員工、頂層及底層等面向),並結合個人的成功歸因,與相對剝奪感等多種變項交互分析探討。 本研究將背景因素列為控制變項(性別、年齡、教育程度、收入、職業、族群、居住地及主觀社會階層);並以個人對成功因素之認知(家庭背景、先賦地位、人際關係及個人努力)及相對剝奪感為預測變數,以此解釋個人感知與各種關於社會衝突(中產與勞動、富人與窮人、主管與員工、頂層與低層)的不同程度。 本研究的結果指出,當個人認為自己的相對剝奪感越重,越認為社會衝突的存在感。以成功歸因屬「先賦地位」的部分,與各項對社會衝突的知覺均有顯著性的正相關。此研究成果亦與社會不平等理論所主張,社會資源由少數特定族群所壟斷,造成社會階級難以流動,因此屬於性別及群族的先賦地位,更是代表與生俱來的優勢或劣勢,影響個人成功的因素甚鉅。

並列摘要


The data analyzed here were collected by the Taiwan Social Change Survey in 2010(Round 5, Year 5—Social inequalities) ,which was conducted by the Academia Sinica, subjective survey respondents think that there is a conflict (including rich and poor, the middle class and labor, executives and employees, for the top and bottom, etc.), combined with personal success attributed to society, relative deprivation and other variations Discussion item interactive analysis. In this study, contextual factors as control variables (gender, age, education, income, occupation, ethnic group, place of residence and subjective social class); and personal awareness of the success factors of the (family background, ascribed status, relationships and personal effort) and the relative deprivation of forecast variables in order to explain a variety of individual perception and social conflicts (in production and labor, rich and poor, executives and employees, the top and low-rise) on different levels. The results of this study indicated that when individuals feel that your sense of relative deprivation more severe, the more there is a sense that the social conflict. In the case of the success attributed to "ascribed status" in part, we have significant and positive correlation with the perception of social conflict. This research also advocated the theory of social inequality and social resources are monopolized by a small number of specific ethnic groups, resulting in difficult social class mobility, and therefore belong to the sex and ascribed status ethnic group, but also on behalf of the inherent superiority or inferiority, factors affecting the personal success very huge.

參考文獻


林宗弘(2009)。台灣的後工業化:階級結構的轉型與社會不平等,1992-2007。台灣社會學刊,43,93-158。
蔡明璋(2012)。工作價值、成功條件與公平:臺灣民眾的長期分析。載於謝雨生、傅仰止(主編)。台灣的社會變遷1985~2005:社會階層與勞動市場(165-215頁)。台北:中研院社會所。
許嘉猷、黃毅志(2002)。跨越階級界線?兼論「黑手變頭家」的實證研究結果及與歐美社會之一些比較。台灣社會學刊,27,1-59。
邵莉淓(2009)。社經地位與教養行為對國小學童表現的影響。國立臺北大學社會學系碩士論文,台北市。
陳曉佳(2004)。台灣地區國中學生文化資本、習性與學業成就之關係。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,台北市。

延伸閱讀