我國田徑欄架成績之研究－以84年至92年之年度十傑為例

An Investigation and Analysis on the Performance of the Top 10 Hurdler from 1995 to 2004

陳文英(Wen-Ing Chen) ； 陳文銓(Wen-Chung Chen) ； 張家銘(Chia-Ming Chang) ； 黃成志(Chen-Chih Huang)

《教練科學》 4期 (2004/08) Pp. 13-28

https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.2004.04.01

摘要

The purpose of this research was to explore the yearly performances of the domestic hurdlers, and compare their performances with those of the hurdlers from the nearby Japan so as to have a further understanding of the differences in the performances of the hurdlers from Taiwan and Japan. The performances of the top 10 male/female hurdlers in Taiwan from 1995 to 2003 as well as those of the top 10 hurdlers from Japan in 2002 and 2003 were taken as the research subjects. Through descriptive analysis and one-way ANOVA and discussion, the following conclusions are obtained:
1. Standard: Male 110 Mh-2002 14.63 seconds, 2004 14.80 seconds; 400 mH-2002 53.36 seconds, 2003 53.37 seconds; female 100 mH 2002 14.84 seconds, 400 m 2002 64.54 seconds, 2003 62.98 seconds.
2. ANOVA analysis and posteriori comparisons:
(1)For the comparison between various years of our country, the difference is not significant (P＞.05).
(2)Comparing between the ten outstanding players of various years of our country and Japan, for the 110 mH, in 2002 and 2003, the results of the ten outstanding players in Japan are all better than our country and the difference is significant (P＜.05). For male 400 mH, in 2002 and 2003, the results of the ten outstanding players of Japan are all better than our country and the difference is significant (P＜.05).
(3)For female 100 mH, in 2002 and 2003, the results of the ten outstanding players are all better than our country and the difference is significant (P＜.05). For female 400mH, in 2002, the ten outstanding players of Japan are better than the ten outstanding players of our country and the difference is significant (P＜.05), The ten outstanding players of Japan in 2003 arc better than the ten outstanding players of our country in 1997, 2002 and 2003 and the difference is significant (P＜.05).
From this research, it can be seen that regardless of whether it is the standard or present condition, the male and female hurdle sport result of our country is not ideal including comparison with the ten outstanding players of this year of nearby Japan and the comparison with the World Cup Tournament standard etc. and there is quite a difference. In view of this, it is suggested that the domestic hurdle coach and players should seek for improvement from the factor of affecting the hurdle result and then establish their training goals. As much as possible, they should base on the result of the first ten outstanding players of Japan as the standard. Do not just set up the goal just to seek for medals in the country and thereby ignore that the result standard cannot catch up with the tide.

關鍵字

田徑 ； 欄架

並列摘要

The purpose of this research was to explore the yearly performances of the domestic hurdlers, and compare their performances with those of the hurdlers from the nearby Japan so as to have a further understanding of the differences in the performances of the hurdlers from Taiwan and Japan. The performances of the top 10 male/female hurdlers in Taiwan from 1995 to 2003 as well as those of the top 10 hurdlers from Japan in 2002 and 2003 were taken as the research subjects. Through descriptive analysis and one-way ANOVA and discussion, the following conclusions are obtained:
1. Standard: Male 110 Mh-2002 14.63 seconds, 2004 14.80 seconds; 400 mH-2002 53.36 seconds, 2003 53.37 seconds; female 100 mH 2002 14.84 seconds, 400 m 2002 64.54 seconds, 2003 62.98 seconds.
2. ANOVA analysis and posteriori comparisons:
(1)For the comparison between various years of our country, the difference is not significant (P＞.05).
(2)Comparing between the ten outstanding players of various years of our country and Japan, for the 110 mH, in 2002 and 2003, the results of the ten outstanding players in Japan are all better than our country and the difference is significant (P＜.05). For male 400 mH, in 2002 and 2003, the results of the ten outstanding players of Japan are all better than our country and the difference is significant (P＜.05).
(3)For female 100 mH, in 2002 and 2003, the results of the ten outstanding players are all better than our country and the difference is significant (P＜.05). For female 400mH, in 2002, the ten outstanding players of Japan are better than the ten outstanding players of our country and the difference is significant (P＜.05), The ten outstanding players of Japan in 2003 arc better than the ten outstanding players of our country in 1997, 2002 and 2003 and the difference is significant (P＜.05).
From this research, it can be seen that regardless of whether it is the standard or present condition, the male and female hurdle sport result of our country is not ideal including comparison with the ten outstanding players of this year of nearby Japan and the comparison with the World Cup Tournament standard etc. and there is quite a difference. In view of this, it is suggested that the domestic hurdle coach and players should seek for improvement from the factor of affecting the hurdle result and then establish their training goals. As much as possible, they should base on the result of the first ten outstanding players of Japan as the standard. Do not just set up the goal just to seek for medals in the country and thereby ignore that the result standard cannot catch up with the tide.

並列關鍵字

track and field ； hurdle

參考文獻

400m網站

中華田徑(1996)。1995年年度十傑。中華田徑。64，45-51。

中華田徑(1997)。1996年年度十傑。中華田徑。68，61-77。

中華田徑(1998)。1997年年度十傑。中華田徑。72，66-72。

中華田徑(1999)。1998年年度十傑。中華田徑。75，63-72。