大雪山國家公園休閒活動設計之休閒效益研究

本研究經由三天兩夜的大雪山休閒活動設計，共有74位受試者志願參與，其中男性32位、女性42位，進行實徵性的研究，來探討參與者之休閒參與現況和休閒效益，並探討不同背景變項在休閒參與與休閒效益上之差異情形，以及休閒參與與休閒效益之相關性。本研究以「個人基本資料」、「休閒參與量表」以及「休閒效益量表」為研究工具，資料經收集分析後發現：在休閒參與方面過去一年以郊山為最多，其次為中級山，而以高山最少，參與時間大約在1天以下，參與強度隨著郊山、中級山到高山，由輕鬆、有點累而到累的強度，參與時間大多在上午8點到11點左右，登山裝備平均花費大約在5,000～10,000元，有多數成員並未加入登山健行協會，登山健行年資以7～15年最多。在休閒效益方面，以促進新陳代謝，維持體能保持健康，以及提升心肺功能鍛鍊體能的認同度最高，而各層面的認同度則依序為生理、心理及社交效益，整體的休閒效益認同度達中上程度。此外，中級山有顯著的避暑作用，其休閒效益顯著比郊山和高山為佳。再者，除了性別以外，不同背景變項之登山健行者，在休閒參與與休閒效益上並無顯著差異。最後證實，不同的休閒參與方式在運動強度與參與同伴對於休閒效益有顯著的差異。

關鍵字

中級山；登山健行者；休閒參與；休閒效益

並列摘要

This study was designed through three days and two nights leisure activities in the Dasyueshan National Forest Recreation Area. A total of 74 subjects volunteered to participate, including 32 men and 42 women. An empirical study was conducted to explore the current state of leisure participation and leisure benefits of the participants, and explore the differences in leisure participation and leisure benefits of different background variables, as well as the correlation between leisure participation and leisure benefits. This research uses ＂Basic Personal Information＂, ＂Leisure Participation Scale＂ and ＂Leisure Benefit Scale＂ as research tools. After collecting and analyzing the data, it is found that in terms of leisure participation in the past year, suburban mountains are the most common, followed by intermediate mountains. the highest mountain is the least, and the participation time is about 1 to 2 days. The participation intensity varies from suburban mountains, intermediate mountains to high mountains, from relaxed, a little tired to tired, and the participation time is mostly from 8 am to 11 am. The average cost of mountaineering equipment is about $5,000 to 10,000. Most members have not joined the Mountaineering Association, and the hiking experience is 7-15 years. In terms of leisure benefits, the recognition of promoting metabolism, maintaining physical fitness, and improving cardiovascular function is the highest, and the acceptance of each level is in order of physical, psychological and social benefits, and the overall acceptance of leisure benefits is mid-to-up. To the degree. In addition, the middle-level mountain has a significant effect of preventing the summer heat, and its leisure benefits are significantly better than the suburban mountain and the high mountain. Furthermore, apart from gender, mountain hikers of different backgrounds have no significant differences in leisure participation and leisure benefits. Finally, it is confirmed that different leisure participation methods have significant differences in the exercise intensity and the leisure benefits of participating partners.