透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.30.253
  • 期刊

政治、意識形態和運動政策之政治歷史考察-一個橫跨兩岸爭議之議題

A Study of the Political History for Politics, Political Ideology and Sport Policy in Taiwan

摘要


本研究目的旨在探討政治價值對於臺灣運動政策系統的影響。本文的研究目的有兩個面向。首先、探討國民黨與民進黨對於臺灣的運動政策顯現在政治價值、政策主導權及運動政策制訂認知上,在國家層級及國際層級的不同。其次、臺灣逐漸發展兩黨政治,且對於運動發展有不同的政治意識形態之下,本文進一步深究,在此政治發展架構之下,國際間的發展對於臺灣運動政策的影響。本文核心探討議題,反映臺灣主要政黨對於中國的政治意識型態的不同。例如、國民黨及新黨的大中國主義及民進黨的臺灣獨立意識形態政治立場差異。此一政治意識型態不同之議題,源自國民黨自中國大陸轉進臺灣開始,而且與很多國內事務政策皆有關聯。但是國內對於運動政策在沒有深究之下,似乎看不出其關聯性。因此本文以提出相關論述及國會議員的質詢內容,並參考相關理論之觀點,呈現臺灣的運動政策發展圖像。

並列摘要


The aim of this essay is to explore the political values in Taiwan sports policy system. It, first, explores differences regarding political values, and the nature of power struggles in sports policy between the KMT and DPP, and secondly, factors beyond Taiwan, are discussed, such as, what effect changes in global context have had on Taiwan? Concerning the status of Taiwan, the new development of two political parties with ideologies, which are contrasting in some significant ways, has implications for sports policy. The major divisions between the ideologies can be defined in relation to the Mainland China issue. The parties of KMT, the People First Party (PFP), and the New Party (NP) can be described as adopting a 'greater Chinese nationalist ideology. In contrast, the DPP and the Taiwan Independence Party (TAIP) are associated with a policy of 'separated development' and independence for Taiwan. Ideological differences associated with this issue have run deep since 1949. However, though its origins are in political reaction with the mainland, this ideological cleavage signals other policy implications in a wide range of what might at first sight seem unrelated policy areas. For these reasons, this essay present and provide regarding academic debates and political intention from Member of Parliament and theoretical concepts to provide a whole picture of the development of sport policy.

並列關鍵字

political values KMT DPP political ideology

參考文獻


Liu, H. Y.(2007).A Study of the Signing of Lausanne Agreement between IOC and Chinese Taipei.Sport Studies.1,53-83.
Sun, Kuo-Hsiang(2006).Can China Play a Responsible Stakeholder? The Role of China in Cross-Strait Relations.Views & Policies.3(1),55-75.
Adams, I.(1993).Political Ideology Today.Manchester University Press.
Adams, I.(1998).Ideology and Politics in Britain Today.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
Alan, Bairner(2008).Sport, the Nation State and Political Identities.Sport Studies.7,161-180.

延伸閱讀