透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.90.40.84
  • 期刊

多重的辯證列斐伏爾空間生產概念三元組演繹與引申

Dialectics in Multitude an Exploration Into/Beyond Henri Lefebvre's Conceptual Triad of Production of Space

摘要


本文旨在說明,西方學界對於列斐伏爾空間生產論概念三元組(空間實踐、空間再現和再現空間)的幾種演繹方式,並以新近的理論取向來加以引申和修正。首先,列斐伏爾的空間生產概念三元組中蘊含著二元張力,但二元張力位居何處,則有不同看法,分別可以葛瑞哥里和索雅的詮釋爲代表。哈維則以空間性質的三種存有論,來與列斐伏爾的概念三元組交錯,值得藉此發展成爲以關係和過程爲核心的多重辯證觀點,來理解列斐伏爾的概念三元組。其次,本文引申空間實踐的概念,運用紀登斯的結構二元性觀點,指出空間實踐可以理解爲結構和行動的相互構成,並援引行動者-網絡理論和操演概念,來補充列斐伏爾空間生產論中較乏討論的能動性課題,提出網絡與操演的二元性。第三,針對空間再現和再現空間這組概念所暗含的抽象與具體、支配與從屬/抵抗的對照性意涵,本文主張予以一般化和政治化,形成空間再現之政治和再現空間之政治的觀點,並討論空間再現含納的知識和意識形態二元性,以及再現空間概念含納的身體和想像二元性,然後分別與傅柯的知識/權力觀念,以及拉岡的真實、象徵和想像三界域的區分對話。最後,本文提出須回到社會-空間的歷史地理時勢,尤其是列斐伏爾提出的從抽象空間到差異空間的社會轉化,來看待空間生產論的分析價值。

並列摘要


This article provides an exploration into Henri Lefebvre's conceptual triad in production of space-spatial practice, representations of space, and spaces of representation-and tries to supplement and revise it with new theoretical approaches. Firstly, the dialectical tensions in the conceptual triad are identified through Gregory, Soja and Harvey's elaborations on Lefebvre's formula, leading to a view of ”dialectics in multitude” that lay emphasis on relation and process. Secondly, the author applies concepts from Giddens' structuration theory, Butler's performativity, and actor-network theory on spatial practice to focus on the dialectical tension between structure and agency. Thirdly, the two often dichotomized concepts of ”representations of space” and ”spaces of representation” are both generalized as fields for political struggle, and expounded as having their own dialectical tensions which are knowledge-ideology and body-imagination respectively. Finally, the author argues that the conceptual triad of production of space must be put into historical-geographical context to realize its analytical and strategic values.

參考文獻


Althusser, L.(1984).Essays on Ideology.London:Verso.
Benjamin, W.,Arendt, H. (ed.)(1968).Illuminations.New York:Schocken Books.
Blum, V.,Nast, H.(1996).Where's the difference? The heterosexualization of alterity in Henri Lefebvre and Jacques Lacan.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space.14(5),559-580.
Blum, V.,Nast, H.,Crang, M. (eds.),Thrift, N. (eds.)(2000).Thinking Space.London:Routledge.
Bourdieu, P.(1984).Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.

被引用紀錄


盧怡涵(2017)。新舊都市紋理下的城市生活 ─以台北大橋頭街廓為研究的設計提案〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846%2fTKU.2017.00827
林琬婷(2016)。城市地標的空間論述─以台北101為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846%2fTKU.2016.00358
王友嫈(2014)。列斐伏爾的空間再生產:以閒置空間再利用為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846%2fTKU.2014.00455
康哈拿(2012)。空間的社會批判:列斐伏爾空間理論研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846%2fTKU.2012.00643
鄒尹禎(2010)。住在時間的城市裡〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846%2fTKU.2010.01096

延伸閱讀