透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.147.89.85
  • 期刊

評估研究的演進與挑戰:政策民主化觀點的檢視

摘要


本文焦點在探討方法論與政策民主化議題。首先,本文檢閱評估研究的發展趨勢,指出前三代評估與第四代評估的主要差異,特別是在基本假定上有很大的不同。簡單地說,建構主義方法論的運用,產生了明顯有別於科學探究之結果。學者指出,這樣的評估途徑頗適合應用於公共行政領域,畢竟政策問題通常是棘手的,該途徑則能夠把互動與參與式政策途徑結合運用。然而,這並非意味著在評估者在實際執行的過程中,將不會遭遇到任何的阻礙。回應性評估在執行上通常欠缺最適化的條件。在此情形下,評估者如何在實存世界之中,妥善管理社群參與的過程,遂值得吾人進一步地討論。本文最後結論道,回應性評估如能擷取批判理論的觀察洞見,才能使理論發展更臻健全。

並列摘要


For the purpose of this study, the author attends to concentrate on the issues of methodology and policy democratization. The author begins the discussion by reviewing four generations of evaluation and demonstrates that there are major difference between the first three generations and the last one, especially in their basic assumptions. Briefly, the results of utilizing constructivist methodology are startlingly different from those of scientific inquiry. Scholars point out that this approach to evaluation is especially appropriate for the field of public administration, given the existing wicked problems and the potential synergy with interactive and participatory policy approaches. However, this is not to say that evaluators face no barrier in the implementation of responsive evaluation. The conditions for conducting a responsive evaluation usually are not optimal. Thus the issue of how evaluators manage the processes of community participation in a real world needs further discussion. This paper concludes only when combined in some sense with critical theory is a sound responsive evaluation theory possible.

參考文獻


林國明、陳東升(2003)。公民會議與審議民主:全民健保的公民參與經驗。台灣社會學。6,61-118。
林水波(2005)。公投評估、罅隙認定及控管。政策研究學報。5,1-28。
Abma, T.(2004).Responsive Evaluation: The Meaning and Special Contribution to Public Administration.Public Administration.82(4),993-1012.
Bobrow D. B.,J. S. Dryzek.(1987).Policy Analysis by Design.Pittsburgh, Pa.:University of Pittsburgh Press.
Box, K. C.(1998).Citizen Governance: Leading American Communities into the 21st Century.CA.:Sage.

被引用紀錄


陳麗秋(2022)。從創作者角度探討:「逐頁」與「條狀」漫畫之創作思維與環境轉化研究設計學研究25(1),1-21。https://doi.org/10.30105/JDS.202207_25(1).0001
江嘉慧(2011)。臺灣身心障礙者經銷電腦型彩券之回應性評估〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2708201101011800
施品如(2013)。公部門專案績效評估之研究:以教育部推動大專畢業生至企業職場實習方案為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0602201304480900
劉錦燕(2013)。護照親辦政策之回應性評估─以新北市為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0502201302003700
黃堃恒(2015)。我國高中公民科教育政策之回應性評估〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614031981

延伸閱讀