透過您的圖書館登入
IP:44.211.28.92
  • 期刊

都市視覺景觀偏好之研究

Visual Preference of Urban Landscape

摘要


視覺景觀偏好的研究乃經由觀賞者的視覺經驗對景觀資源偏好的評價,鑑於以往都市景觀規畫缺乏對居民景觀偏好的了解,而導致都市建設未能適切地符合居民之需求,本文探討居民環境態度與都市景觀偏好之關係。都市景觀樣本地點之選擇,首先經由相關文獻調查台中市都市發展演變過程,並透過專業者認知圖之疊圖過程,分析台中市都市空間架構,蒐集具有代表性及可意象性之都市景觀地點,遴選出20個都市景觀地點作為實證研究之樣本點。居民環境態度經由因素分析得到七個因素,分別命名為「都市適應因素」、「田園休閒因素」、「歷史懷舊因素」、「社交群居因素」、「機械科技因素」、「自我隱私因素」、及「環境信任因素」,再将標準化因素得點進行群落分析,可得四種不同環境態度類群的居民,分別命名為「自我保守型」、「傳統念舊型」、「環境關懷型」和「現代生活型」,獲得主要結論有:(1)居民基本屬性不同,其景觀偏好僅在部份景觀地點會因性別及職業屬性而有所差異,但不受年齡、居住時間、收入、教育程度、居住地等社經因子所影響。(2)不同都市環境態度類群之居民對都市景觀地點有不同程度的偏好。自我保守型與其他三群間差異最多,且居民環境態度較居民基本屬性對景觀偏好之解釋力強。(3)景觀認知因子在現代性、自然性、親切性及易識別性與景觀評價因子偏好成正相關,且親切性與易識別性之相關值大於現代性與自然性因子。

並列摘要


Since Taiwan urban planning did not concern residents' preference for urban landscape, the development of urban could not reflect residents' needs. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between residents' environmental attitudes and their preference of the city landscape. This study firstly general reviewed the history of Taichung city and then had a research on the structure of urban spaces according to the procedure of analyzing various professional maps. Twenty places were selected to be the cases for studying. Factor analysis was used to derive seven residents' environmental attitude dimensions. They were urban adaptation, pastoral leisure, nostalgic antiquarian, social communality, mechanical orientation, self-privacy, and environmental trust seven dimensions. According to the factor score, four groups of environmental attitude type: urbanism, conservation, antiquarianism and modernism were classified by cluster analysis. The main findings were: (1) The relationships of socio-demographic variable and cityscape preference showed that gender and occupations were partly related to the preference, while age, income, resident place had no significant correlation to cityscape preference. (2) The different groups of environmental attitude residents had different levels of preference toward the cityscape. The residents of generalist style had the most difference with the other groups. (3) The preference of cityscape showed significantly associated by landscape cognitive components. Friendliness and legibility had stronger association than naturalness and modernization to preference of cityscape.

參考文獻


Chalmers, D. J., Knight, R. G.(1985).The reliability of ratings of the familiarity of Environmental stimuli: A generalizability analysis.Environment and Behavior.17
Dearden, P.(1984).Factors influencing landscape preferences: An empirical investigation.Landscape Planning.11
Herbert, W. S., Brian, O.(1994).Viewer preference for spatial arrangement of park trees: An application of video-imaging technology.Environmental Management.10
Herzog, T. R.(1984).A cognitive analysis of preference for field and forest environments.Landscape Research.9(1)
Herzog, T. R., Kaplan, S., Kaplan, R.(1976).The prediction of preference for familiar urban places.Environment and Behavior.8

被引用紀錄


鄭益豐(2008)。廣告招牌形成之都市視覺景觀的結構分析---以台北市為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846%2fTKU.2008.00613
林宏誠(2013)。都市居民對居住環境需求差異性之研究—以臺北市忠孝國小學區為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841%2fNTUT.2013.00423
曾敦揚(2011)。民眾對風景區涼亭之認知與偏好探討–以澎湖國家風景區為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841%2fNTUT.2011.00634
陳怡芳(2007)。捷運場站景觀計畫之研究-以淡水線高架路段為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841%2fNTUT.2007.00306
賴威郡(2006)。橋梁構造設計景觀美學原則之探討〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841%2fNTUT.2006.00300

延伸閱讀


  • 陳俊銘、林晏州(2001)。民眾對都市天際線景觀知覺與偏好之研究都市與計劃28(3),367-386。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10181067-200112-28-3-367-386-a
  • 嚴勝雄(1989)。都市與區域研究之構思國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報(4),37-48。https://doi.org/10.6154%2fJBP.1989.4.003
  • 程鈺絜(2022)。視覺複雜性與景觀偏好之關係探討〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342%2fNTU202203649
  • Kwong, M. K. (1998). Postmodern streetscapes [master's thesis, The University of Hong Kong]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0029-1812201200000404
  • Tang, K. L. (2002). Urban design control [master's thesis, The University of Hong Kong]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0029-1812201200000201