透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.128.205.109
  • 期刊

從集體行動看社區意識與管理制度對公寓大廈管理維護之影響-管理維護客觀績效與社區主委主觀滿意度分析

Impact of Community Cohesion and Institutionalized Management on Collective Action-An Analysis of Subjective Satisfaction and Objective Performance in Condominium Management and Maintenance

摘要


社區意識與管理制度是促成公寓大廈管理維護集體行動的兩種途徑,前者可提升鄰里情誼與環境認同,後者可促使居住品質維持一定水準,兩者對於管理維護表現也都有所影響。透過管理維護主、客觀表現之衡量,社區意識與管理制度對於住宅管理維護有何影響?結合主、客觀二者來看,真正好的管理維護其意涵為何?較佳的管理維護表現組合(主觀滿意度高、客觀績效表現亦好)會受到哪些因素影響?乃本文所關注之焦點。 實證結果發現,社區意識與管理制度對於管理維護的主、客觀表現皆有顯著的影響,不過委外管理程度(管理制度)的重要性大於社區意識,顯示在促成公寓大廈管理維護的集體行動時,制度途徑(管理制度)的效果比社會途徑(社區意識)來得大。此外,真正好的管理維護應該是「住家環境非常安全、舒適,住戶也感到很滿意」,透過實證分析可知,社區戶數愈多、屋齡愈新、決議事項執行效率愈好、社區意識凝聚情形愈佳、委外程度愈高,管理維護表現出現「較佳組合」的機率會比「較差組合」來得大。

並列摘要


Community cohesion and institutionalized management are perceived as the communitarian and institutional solutions to collective action in condominium management and maintenance; the community cohesion enhances resident relationships and ”sense of community” whereas institutionalized management helps retain living quality. Based on the analysis of subjective satisfaction and objective performance, community cohesion and institutionalized management appear to co-exist in housing management. However, the effect of the degree of delegation (institutionalized management) is more significant than community cohesion in performance of management. This analytical finding suggests institutional solutions have a greater impact that communitarian solution on collective action in housing management. Moreover, ”good” housing management and maintenance requires a high degree of subjective satisfaction and quality objective performance with ”satisfied residents in safe, clean, and comfortable homes.” Empirical results also indicate that condominium size, house age, management efficiency, community cohesion, and degree of delegation contribute to good performance of housing management and maintenance.

參考文獻


洪子茵、張金鶚(2002)。台北市集合住宅管理維護模式之研究。都市與計劃。29(3),421-444。
Bengtsson, B.(1998).Tenants` dilemma-on collective action in housing.Housing Studies.13(1),99-120.
Bengtsson, B.(2001).Solving the tenants` dilemma: collective action and norms of co-operation in housing.Housing Theory and Society.17(2),175-187.
Buckner, J. C.(1988).The development of instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion.American Journal of Community Psychology.16(6),771-797.
Chen, S. C. Y.,Webster, C. J.(2005).Homeowners associations, collective action and the costs of private governance.Housing Studies.20(2),205-220.

被引用紀錄


游惠麟(2013)。物業管理服務業服務品質與關係品質對公寓大廈住戶行為意向關係之研究〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2013.00097
楊士賢(2009)。國宅社區適用公寓大廈管理條例後管理維護問題之研究-以高雄市為例〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2009.00114
陳怡瑞(2012)。居住滿意度與遷移意願關係之研究〔碩士論文,崑山科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6828/KSU.2012.00095
林肇炫(2007)。公寓大廈管理維護成效之研究-以台南市東區為例〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0015-3108200720281400
王子瀅(2012)。以需求層次理論探討臺北市都市更新整建維護地區居住滿意度之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0006-1307201210433800

延伸閱讀