Title

檢驗「好公民」的認知轉變:比較脈絡下的臺灣公民

Translated Titles

Testing the "Good Citizens" Theory: Taiwanese Citizens in a Comparative Context

Authors

黃信豪(Hsin-hao Huang)

Key Words

公民規範認知 ; 公民精神 ; 政治學習 ; 世代交替 ; citizenship norms ; citizenship ; political learning ; alternation of generation

PublicationName

人文及社會科學集刊

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

30卷1期(2018 / 03 / 01)

Page #

1 - 40

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本研究以Dalton的「好公民」研究爲參照,從比較視野勾勒近年來大眾公民規範認知演變與樣態;其次,也以臺灣爲個案解析個人如何獲取這項認知。透過ISSP兩年度調查資料的分析,本文發現公民規範認知應被區分爲公民職責、自主參與以及社群責任等三方面內涵。其次,穩定民主國家、新興民主國家的認知儘管有所差異,但演變趨勢卻相當一致。當考慮個人年齡因素,跨國比較分析與臺灣實證分析的結果皆符合個人政治學習解釋的預期。本文除了從比較視野拓展Dalton的研究,針對臺灣的發現也意涵我國民主公民教育與公民精神的深化仍有相當大的改善空間。

English Abstract

With the consideration of Dalton's "good citizens" theory, this study compares people's normative beliefs about citizenship cross-nationally, and investigates individuals' acquisition of citizenship norms by the case of Taiwan. By analyzing two waves of survey data of ISSP, we confirm that beliefs about citizenship norms can be divided into three aspects: civic responsibility, autonomous participation, and community duty. Also, respondents' citizenship norms in old democracies are different from those in new democracies, but patterns in the two country groups change in the same direction. Taking individuals' age into account, both our cross-national comparison and empirical analysis on Taiwanese respondents support the explanation of individuals' political learning. This study not only extends Dalton's research to a comparative context, but also implies that there is still much room for improvement in democratic civic education and the deepening of citizenship norms of Taiwan.

Topic Category 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
Reference
  1. 林聰吉、楊湘齡(2008)。台灣社會資本的分佈及其民主效果。東吳政治學報,26(2),39-83。
    連結:
  2. 張佑宗(2011)。選舉結果、政治學習與民主支持—兩次政黨輪替後台灣公民在民主態度與價值的變遷。臺灣民主季刊,8(2),99-137。
    連結:
  3. 莊文忠(2010)。台灣民眾公民意識的變化:2008 年政權二次輪替前後的比較分析。人文及社會科學集刊,22(2),201-246。
    連結:
  4. 黃信豪(2016)。大眾民主認知與政治學習—不同政治體制的比較分析。臺灣民主季刊,13(3),1-44。
    連結:
  5. 黃信豪(2005)。台灣民眾政治功效意識的持續與變遷:政黨輪替前後的分析。選舉研究,12(2),111-147。
    連結:
  6. 黃信豪(2011)。民主態度的類型:台灣民眾二次政黨輪替後的分析。選舉研究,18(1),1-34。
    連結:
  7. 黃信豪(2014)。再探台灣民眾的政治信任—檢驗「批判性公民」解釋。臺灣民主季刊,11(1),153-193。
    連結:
  8. 黃信豪(2006)。政治功效意識的行動效果(1998-2003)。臺灣民主季刊,3(2),119-158。
    連結:
  9. Aldrich, J. H.,Montgomery, J. M.,Wood, W.(2011).Turnout as a Habit.Political Behavior,33(4),535-563.
  10. Almond, G. A.,Verba, S.(1963).The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  11. Balch, G. I.(1974).Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept 'Sense of Political Efficacy'.Political Methodology,1(2),1-43.
  12. Bennett, W. L.(2012).The Personalization of Politics: Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation.The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,644(1),20-39.
  13. Bolzendahl, C.,Coffé, H.(2013).Are 'Good' Citizens 'Good' Participants? Testing Citizenship Norms and Political Participation across 25 Nations.Political Studies,61(S1),45-65.
  14. Bolzendahl, C.,Coffé, H.(2009).Citizenship beyond Politics: The Importance of Political, Civil and Social Rights and Responsibilities among Women and Men.The British Journal of Sociology,60(4),763-791.
  15. Campbell, A.,Converse, P. E.,Miller, W. E.,Stokes, D. E.(1976).The American Voter.Evanston, IL:Row, Peterson & Company.
  16. Campbell, A.,Gurin, G.,Miller, W. E.(1954).The Voter Decides.Evanston, IL:Row, Peterson & Company.
  17. Converse, P. E.(1969).Of Time and Partisan Stability.Comparative Political Studies,2(2),139-171.
  18. Dalton, R. J.(2016).The Good Citizen: How a Younger Generation Is Reshaping American Politics.Washington, DC:CQ Press.
  19. Dalton, R. J.(2008).Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation.Political Studies,56(1),76-98.
  20. Dalton, R. J.(ed.),Klingemann, H.-D.(ed.)(2007).Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  21. Dalton, R. J.(ed.),Shin, D. C.(ed.)(2006).Citizens, Democracy, and Markets around the Pacific Rim: Congruence Theory and Political Culture.New York:Oxford University Press.
  22. Dalton, R. J.(ed.),Wattenberg, M. P.(ed.)(2002).Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  23. Dalton, R. J.,Weldon, S.(2007).Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization.Party Politics,13(2),179-196.
  24. Davidov, E.,Meuleman, B.,Cieciuch, J.,Schmidt, P.,Billiet, J.(2014).Measurement Equivalence in Cross-national Research.Annual Review of Sociology,40,55-75.
  25. Deth, J. W. V.(ed.),Montero, J. R.(ed.),Westholm, A.(ed.)(2007).Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis.New York:Routledge Press.
  26. Diamond, L. J.(2008).The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies throughout the World.New York:Henry Holt and Company, LLC..
  27. Eckstein, H.(1988).A Culturalist Theory of Political Change.American Political Science Review,82(3),789-804.
  28. Freedom House 2015 “Country Ratings and Status, 1973-2014,” Retrieved September 1, 2016, from https://freedomhouse.org/reports
  29. Heater, D. B.(2004).Citizenship: The Civic Ideal in World History, Politics and Education.New York:Manchester University Press.
  30. Hooghe, M.,Oser, J.,Marien, S.(2016).A Comparative Analysis of 'Good Citizenship': A Latent Class Analysis of Adolescents' Citizenship Norms in 38 Countries.International Political Science Review,37(1),115-129.
  31. Huntington, S. P.(1991).The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century.Norman, OK:University of Oklahoma Press.
  32. Inglehart, R.(1990).Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  33. Inglehart, R.,Catterberg, G.(2002).Trends in Political Action: The Developmental Trend and the Post-Honeymoon Decline.International Journal of Comparative Sociology,43(3-5),300-316.
  34. Inglehart, R.,Welzel, C.(2005).Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  35. ISSP (International Social Survey Programme) 2012 “International Social Survey Programme: Citizenship-ISSP 2004,” Retrieved June 30, 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/10.4232/1.11372
  36. ISSP (International Social Survey Programme) 2016 “International Social Survey Programme: Citizenship II-ISSP 2014,” Retrieved June 30, 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/10.4232/1.12590
  37. Isin, E. F.(ed.),Turner, B. S.(ed.)(2002).Handbook of Citizenship Studies.London:Sage Publications.
  38. Janoski, T.(1998).Citizenship and Civil Society: A Framework of Rights and Obligations in Liberal, Traditional, and Social Democratic Regimes.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  39. Lu, J.,Aldrich, J.,Shi, T.-J.(2014).Revisiting Media Effects in Authoritarian Societies: Democratic Conceptions, Collectivistic Norms, and Media Access in Urban China.Politics & Society,42(2),253-283.
  40. Marshall, T. H.(1950).Citizenship and Social Class.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  41. Mattes, R.,Bratton, M.(2007).Learning about Democracy in Africa: Awareness, Performance, and Experience.American Journal of Political Science,51(1),192-217.
  42. Miller, W. E.,Shanks, J. M.(1996).The New American Voter.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  43. Mishler, W.,Rose, R.(2007).Generation, Age, and Time: The Dynamics of Political Learning during Russia's Transformation.American Journal of Political Science,51(4),822-834.
  44. Neuman, W. R.(1986).The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  45. Norris, P.(2011).Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  46. Norris, P.(ed.)(1999).Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government.New York:Oxford University Press.
  47. Oskarsson, S.(2010).Generalized Trust and Political Support: A Cross-National Investigation.Acta Politica,45(4),423-443.
  48. Putnam, R. D.(2000).Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.New York:Simon and Schuster.
  49. Putnam, R. D.,Leonardi, R.,Nanetti, R. Y.(1993).Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  50. Rose, R.,Mishler, W.,Haerpfer, C.(1998).Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
  51. Schudson, M.(1998).The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life.New York:Martin Kessler Books.
  52. Wang, J.,Wang, X.(2012).Structural Equation Modeling: Applications Using Mplus.Chichester, UK:John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
  53. Welzel, C.,Inglehart, R.,Klingemann, H.-D.(2003).The Theory of Human Development: A Cross-Cultural Analysis.European Journal of Political Research,42(3),341-379.
  54. 吳玉山編、林繼文編、冷則剛編(2013)。政治學的回顧與前瞻。臺北=Taipei:五南=Wu-nan。
  55. 俞振華、翁定暐(2016)。臺灣的「好公民」變了嗎?從公民規範認知看民眾政治參與。公民意識、社會正義與公民參與學術研討會,臺北=Taipei:
  56. 郭秋永(2009)。公民意識:實證與規範之間的一個整合研究。公民與政治行動:實證與規範之間的對話,臺北=Taipei:
  57. 章英華 2005 〈台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2004 第四期第五次:公民權組〉。2016 年9 月1 日,取自https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=813 (Chang, Ying-hwa, 2005, “2004 Taiwan Social Change Survey (Round 4, Year 5): Citizenship,” Retrieved September 1, 2016, from https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=813)
  58. 傅仰止 2015 〈台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2014 第六期第五次:公民權組〉。2016 年9 月1 日,取自https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=1055 (Fu, Yang-chih, 2015, “2014Taiwan Social Change Survey (Round 6, Year 5): Citizenship,” Retrieved September 1,2016, from https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=1055)
Times Cited
  1. 黃信豪(2020)。再探臺灣的「批判性公民」:2008-2016。選舉研究,27(1),39-84。
  2. 黃信豪(2021)。Linking Understanding of Citizenship to Political Activism: A Comparative Study across 29 Democracies。調查研究-方法與應用,46,121-160。