Title |
子宮頸糜爛到底需不需要治療(會議報告) |
Translated Titles |
Cervical Erosion? |
DOI |
10.7010/JGO.201104.0058 |
Authors |
王鵬惠(Peng-Hui Wang);劉復興(Fu-Shing Liu);余堅忍(Ken-Jen Yu) |
Key Words |
子宮頸炎 ; 子宮頸外翻 ; Cervicitis ; cervical ectopy |
PublicationName |
中華民國婦癌醫學雜誌 |
Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication |
2011年1期(2011 / 04 / 01) |
Page # |
58 - 63 |
Content Language |
繁體中文 |
Chinese Abstract |
子宮頸糜爛到底需不需要治療,這個問題爭議已久。經過實證醫學討論,應該就從其潛在疾病來處置。感染就針對感染的病原來治療,癌前病變就針對目前的指引來處置,臨床上「子宮頸糜爛」一詞不應再被使用。 |
English Abstract |
Cervical erosion is an anachronism and should be abandoned. The term of cervical ectopy might be a better choice. Since cervical ectopy is a transient situation, frequently secondary to fluctuation of hormones, if absence of associated underlying diseases, no further treatment is recommended. |
Topic Category |
醫藥衛生 >
內科 醫藥衛生 > 婦產科與老幼科 |
Times Cited |