Food provisioning to 4 Accipiter virgatus nests and 2 A. trivirgatus nests was monitored during 1998 and 2000 in Yangmingshan National Park, Taipei, Taiwan. We made direct observations of prey deliveries and collected prey remains and pellets throughout the breeding seasons in order to compare the effectiveness and efficiency of the different diet analysis methods for these 2 raptor species. The method of using prey remains worked best for A. virgatus for all measurements, producing 45.23% of all prey items found, 45.23% of all prey items identified to prey taxa, and 38.87% of all prey items identified to species. The observation method worked best for A. trivirgatus, providing 41.05% of all prey items and 18.95% of prey items identified to species, but the proportion of prey items identified to prey taxa was highest using the pellet method (37.37%). Time efficiency was consistently the highest for the prey remains method in A. virgatus. In contrast, for A. trivirgatus, the pellet method was most efficient for assessing the number of prey items delivered and the number identified to prey taxa, but the prey remains method worked best for identifying prey to species. Combining the prey remains and pellet methods increased the prey taxa identified to 81.63% for A. virgatus and 58.95% for A. trivirgatus. Although the value of direct observation has been stressed by many researchers, its effectiveness varied between these 2 species studied in Taiwan.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。