透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.15.63.145
  • 期刊

名教與真機-耿定向、李卓吾學術論爭之本質及其意義

Confucian Ethical Codes and True Mind-The Intrinsic Quality and the Significance about the Debates of Keng Ting-hsiang and Li Zhuo-wu

摘要


晚明的進步思想家李卓吾,與泰州健將耿定向,曾有長達十數年之論爭,然彼此論爭之本質、及其背後隱含之學術問題與意義為何,在既有研究中尚少有深入探討。若掃除刻板印象,還原耿、李論爭之本質,實乃本於「責善,朋友之道」所從事的「問學」之爭。曾有論者以「天臺重名教,卓吾識真機」分別二者,實則耿、李之學術,皆以「識真機」為本;然因「天臺重名教」,故憂心若外「名教」而言「真機」,不啻為「拆籬放犬」;而「卓吾識真機」,故強調若「名教」無法包容異端,則亦將自喪「真機」。耿、李之爭反映出「名教」與「真機」間,確實有其矛盾難解之困境,然兩人卻以「兩舍兩從」的胸襟氣度尋求調合之道,故其論爭之積極意義與價值值得彰揚。

關鍵字

耿定向 李卓吾 晚明王學 泰州學派 名教 真機

並列摘要


Li Zhuo-wu was a celebrated heretical thinker in the Late-Ming Dynasty. All the way, he was considered an iconoclast and anti-traditionalism. Until the past twenty years, the scholars had gradually accepted an opinion that Li Zhuo-wu's theories originated form the Wang Yang-ming's doctrine of the mind. Keng Ting-hsiang was a scholar of Taichou School being an influence on the academia of the Late-Ming Dynasty. But in the later period, the scholars were ignored to study Keng's doctrines. For the Li's advocating staunchly of ”true Confucianism”, and the continuous debates among Li and Keng, the scholars generally regarded Keng as a pseudo-Confucian. However, Li criticized severely Keng on the one part, but still eulogized that Keng was a sage on the other part. Then we consider that the evaluation about Keng was prejudiced for a long time. Li's ”true Confucianism” was a distinctive Confucianism about life practice, and he believed that genuine friends should redress errors mutually. The intrinsic quality about the debates among Li and Keng was responding to the debate between friends. Both the learning of Li and Keng were the practical wisdom. Their debates were concerned with the contradiction between Confucian ethical codes and true mind. It could help us to explore the meaning of their theories in Confucian's development. We could think about the questions comprise the ideal and reality, the dilemma, and the future of Confucianism.

參考文獻


袁光儀(2007)。道德或反道德?-李贄及其「童心說」的再詮釋。臺北大學中文學報。155-185。
宋朱熹。學海出版社。
宋朱熹(1988)。四書集註。臺北:學海出版社。
宋朱熹。學海出版社。
明王夫之。里仁書局。

被引用紀錄


王矞慈(2015)。李贄的倫理思想研究──以其論儒釋道三教為考察對象〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.02233
吳孟謙(2014)。融貫與批判:晚明三教論者管東溟的思想及其時代〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.01117
張育齊(2009)。思想人物與地方社會的交涉──以晚明湖北麻城、黃安為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.02024
袁光儀(2013)。論晚明儒者耿定向之學術及其價值-與《明儒學案》商榷中國學術年刊(35_2),33-56。https://doi.org/10.6238/SIS.201309.02

延伸閱讀