This paper discusses the relationship between ethnicity, education and occupation in the first part. Regarding the ethnic educational and occupational difference, it argues that a family's socio-economic status is far more important in affecting next generation's mobility than state's subsidy policy. In the second part, it discusses the initial conditions of different classes which was formed by the state's policy in the 1950s. It tries to understand the life chances for different classes to mobile at that time.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。