透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.14.22.250
  • 期刊

關於台灣原住民“民族”生成的幾個論證

The Arguments on the Formulation of Taiwan Indigenous "Nations"

摘要


自1983年開始,由都市原住民知識精英所帶動的泛原住民運動促發了泛原住民意識之凝聚。1992年之後更因為部落主義的推動,使泛原住民族意識轉化為原住民各民族的意識,從而完成各民族的建構。然而,若我們武斷的認為台灣原住民的民族建構是一個斷裂的現象,將忽略了日治時期的番人,以及更早的部落在原住民各民族建構過程中所具有的連續性意義。從事後的(ex post facto)觀點來看,本文主張,在原住民各民族完成現代的民族建構之前,即分別以原型民族、初期民族之姿出現於歷史舞台。前者係屬在現代國家出現之前的部落社會;後者則是現代國家出現後,經過政策所動員的跨部落族別。後者與現代民族不同的是,她沒有民族主義所促發的民族運動。至於因為原住民運動所驅動的泛原住民表則是一種多元民族體,她的多元意義是由各民族作為單元民族體所補足。

並列摘要


Since 1983, some educated indigenous intellectuals in urban leaded a pan-indigenous movement which stimulated pan-indigenous national consciousness. After 1992, tribalism as a new movement approach has shift pan-indigenous consciousness into the consciousness of individually indigenous nation and formulated individually indigenous nation. However, if we think the formulation is purely modern product, that thinking would be arbitrarily because of neglecting previous fanren (番人) and tribes as continuum of the formulative process. To the ex post facto view, I argued that there existed proto nations and incipient nations before the formulation of modern indigenous nations: the former involve tribes, the latter are the consequence of tribalization impelled by modern state. The distinction between incipient nations and nations is that the letter have national movement stimulated by nationalism. Regarding ”pan-indigenous nations”, as a multinational unit stimulated through pan-indigenous movement, which meaning is supplemented by individually indigenous ”nation”.

參考文獻


Allport, Gordon W.(1958).The Nature of Prejudice.New York:Doubleday & Company Inc..
Anaya, James S.(1996).Indigenous Peoples in International Law.New York:Oxford University Press.
Armstrong, J.(1982).Nations Before Nationalism.Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina Press.
Brubaker, Rogers(1996).Nationalism Reframed: Nationalism and the National Question in the New Europe.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Connor, Walker(1994).Nationalism.Oxford:Oxford University Press.

被引用紀錄


賈凡逸(2016)。族群、部落與法律多元:台灣原住民族的部落自決〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201601299
阮俊達(2015)。台灣原住民族運動的軌跡變遷(1983-2014)〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.01953
賴俊兆(2014)。原住民族教育權利的憲法建構〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.02289
Chao, C. C. (2009). 安身立命於無以為(國)家:泰緬邊境克倫難民的民族主義 [doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.01801
羅中琦(2008)。臺灣原住民長篇歷史小說研究--以漢族作者為主的觀照〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.10431

延伸閱讀