本研究目的是發展中文「健康促進生活型態量表」的簡式量表,檢驗原始中文量表(HPLP)和簡式量表(HPLP-S)測量模型的適配性,並進行簡式量表的信度、效度及複核效度檢核。研究對象為某技術學院學生,樣本一(n=401)為本研究的主要樣本,接受所有研完工具的施測;樣本二(n=559)為進行複核效化檢驗的同質性樣本。測量模型的檢驗是採用結構方程模式的方法,以LISREL軟體進行驗證性因素分析。 主要研究結果如下:(l)驗証性因素分析(CEA)結果,支持HPLP六個分量表的結構。(2)以統計數值為依據,選出每個分量表4題,共24題構成簡式量表的題目。HPLP-S的測量模型CFA檢驗結果,有良好的適配性表現。(3)HPLP-S總量表的內部一致性信度係數為.90,各分量表為.63~.79。(4)HPLP、HPLP-S各分量表與其相關概念間的相關係數均達顯著水準。(5)在樣本一得到的HPLP-S塞本測量模型(除了誤差項以外的所有參數),可遷移到樣本二,支持HPLP-S的部分複核效化。 綜合研究結果,在經過構念效度、信度和複核效度檢驗後,HPLP-S達到初步可接受的水準,為一個可替代HPLP的簡式量表。本研究也討論了未來使用此量表時的參考原則和相關測量議題的研究建議。
The purpose of this study was to develop a short version of the Chinese Health- Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP-S) and to examine the validity and reliability of HPLP-S. The subjects were the students in an institute of technology in Taiwan. The normative sample (n=408) completed the whole self-reported questionnaires, and another cross-validation sample (n=559) completed HPLP measure only. The measurement models were tested using LISREL structural equation modeling. The findings are as follows: (1) Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed six factors for HPLP. (2) On the basis of statistical data, 24 items were selected from the original scale. The final HPLP-S consisted of six subscales, with four items per subscale. CFA revealed that the measurement model of HPLP-S was good fit for the data. (3) The internal consistent reliability coefficients were .90 for HPLP-S total scale and ranged from .63 to .79 for the subscales. (4) The relationships between the subscales of HPLP, HPLP-S and other construct validity-related measures were examined. All correlation coefficients were significant. (5) CFA revealed that the measurement model (excepting parameters associated with error terms) of HPLP-S is invariant across the normative sample and the cross-validation sample. It was concluded that HPLP-S has demonstrated initial reliability and validity. Further using and testing of HPLP-S is discussed.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。