Title

遊憩服務價格、遊憩服務容許量與社會福利

Translated Titles

Recreational Service Price, Recreational Service Capacity and Social Welfare

DOI

10.6267/JTLS.2005.11(3)2

Authors

李堯賢(Yao-Hsien Lee);陳欽楨(Chin-Chen Chen);楊琮泰(Tsung-Tai Yang)

Key Words

遊憩服務容許量 ; 遊憩服務價格 ; 擁擠效果 ; 掃興成本 ; recreational service capacities ; recreational service price ; congestion cost ; displeasure cost

PublicationName

觀光研究學報

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

11卷3期(2005 / 09 / 01)

Page #

209 - 232

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本文探討在考量遊客的遊憩型態、擁擠效果與掃興成本之下,經營休閒遊憩之廠商如何決定提供不同類型的遊憩服務容許量,以及對應的不同類型遊憩服務價格,與該決定對遊客消費者剩餘與社會福利的影響效果。我們發現遊客對遊憩服務不滿意的掃興成本,在不同的擁擠效果下,對廠商的不同類型遊憩服務容許量與對應的不同類型遊憩服務價格會有不同的影響效果。我們的分析顯示,當廠商景點的環境稟賦愈具特色,則社會福利就會愈高,這表示廠商的景點環境稟賦良窳會影響社會福利。但是遊客對環境舒適的評價如果太高,則對社會福利是不利的。此外,根據不同的市場型態所獲得的均衡結果,我們亦做比較靜態分析,數值模擬以及相關的經營意涵討論。

English Abstract

We investigate how a firm determines its recreational service capacities and recreational service prices under considering the tourist's recreation consumption style, congestion cost, and displeasure cost simultaneously. We also analyze how the firm's above decisions affect the tourist's consumer surplus and social welfare. We find that the displeasure cost of tourists has different impacts upon the different recreational service capacities and recreational service prices under the different congestion costs. Our analysis shows that the more environmentally endowment features or characteristics of the firm's recreation site, the higher social welfare. This states that the environmental endowment of the firm's recreation site affects social welfare. However, the higher the tourist's valuation on the environmental amenity, the lower social welfare. In addition, we represent the analysis of comparative statics and numerical stimulation under the different market setups. Business implications of the above analysis are also discussed.

Topic Category 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
社會科學 > 體育學
Reference
  1. 林晏州(2000)。社會遊憩容許量評估方法之研究。戶外遊憩研究,13(1),1-20。
    連結:
  2. 林晏州(2000)。遊憩區選擇行為之研究-敘述偏好之應用。戶外遊憩研究,13(1),63-86。
    連結:
  3. Bagnoli, M.,Watt, S. G.(2003).Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods.Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,12(3),419-445.
  4. Beath, J.,Katsoulacos, Y.(1991).The Economic Theory of Product Differentiation.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  5. Becker, R. H.(1978).Social carrying capacity and user satisfaction: An experiential function.Leisure Sciences,1(3),241-257.
  6. Church, J.,Ware, R.(2000).Industrial Organization: A Strategic Approach.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  7. Cicchetti, C. J.,Smith, V. K.(1973).Congestion, quality deterioration, and optimal use: Wilderness recreation in the Spanish peaks primitive area.Social Science Research,2(1),15-30.
  8. D''Aspremont, C.,Gabszewicz, J. J.,Thisse, J. F.(1979).On Hotelling's stability in competition.Econometrica,47(4),1045-1050.
  9. Gabszewicz, J.(1999).Strategic Interaction and Markets.New York:Oxford University Press.
  10. Gayer, A.,Shy, O.(2003).Internet and peer-to-peer distributions in markets for digital products.Economics Letters,81(2),51-57.
  11. Graefe, A. R.,Vaske, J. J.,Kuss, F. R.(1984).Social carrying capacity: An integration and synthesis of twenty years of research.Leisure Sciences,6(4),395-431.
  12. Hotelling, H.(1929).Stability in competition.Economic Journal,39,41-57.
  13. Iyer, G.(1998).Coordinating channels under price and nonprice competition.Marketing Science,17(4),338-355.
  14. Kreps, D. M.(2004).Microeconomics for Managers.New York:W. W. Norton.
  15. Neher, P. A.(1990).Natural Resources Economics: Conservation and Exploitation.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  16. Schreyer, R.,Roggenbuck, J. W.(1978).The influence of experience expectation on crowding perceptions and social-psychological carrying capacities.Leisure Sciences,1(4),373-394.
  17. Shelby, B.(1980).Crowding models for backcountry recreation.Land Economics,56(1),43-55.
  18. Shelby, B.,Heberlein, T. A.(1984).A conceptual framework for carrying capacity determination.Leisure Sciences,6(4),433-451.
  19. Shy, O.(1995).Industry Organization: Theory and Applications.London:MIT Press.
  20. Shy, O.(2001).The Economics of Network Industries.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  21. Shy, O.,Stenbacka, R.(2003).Strategic outsourcing.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,50(2),203-224.
  22. Shy, O.,Thisse, J. F.(1999).A strategic approach to software protection.Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,8(2),163-190.
  23. Stankey, G. H.,McCool, S. F.(1984).Carrying capacity in recreational settings: Evolution, appraisal, and application.Leisure Sciences,6(4),453-473.
  24. Stiglitz, J.(1986).Economics of the Public Sector.New York:W. W. Norton.
  25. Tirole, J.(1988).The Theory of Industrial Organization.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
  26. Vaske, J. J.,Donnelly, M. P.,Heberlein, T. A.(1980).Perceptions of crowding and resource quality by early and more recent visitors.Leisure Sciences,3(4),367-381.
  27. Wagar, J. A.(1974).Recreational carrying capacity reconsidered.Journal of Forestry,72(5),274-278.
  28. 李鋁輝、謝文豐、高儀文(2000)。主題遊樂園服務品質與遊客購後行為關係之研究。觀光研究學報,5(2),71-88。
  29. 周逸衡、巫喜瑞(2002)。台灣地區休閒農場假曰旅客旅遊決策行為之研究。第一屆服務業行銷暨管理學術研討會論文集,嘉義市:
  30. 林于稜(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中興大學應用經濟研究所未出版之碩士論文。
  31. 林晏州(2001)。運用視覺評估法評定社會遊憩容許量之研究。整合管理與應用經濟學術研討會論文集,高雄縣:
  32. 林晏州(1988)。社會心理遊憩容許量之研究。東海學報,29,819-848。
  33. 林晏州(1990)。健行步道遊憩容許量之評定。東海學報,31,613-627。
  34. 林進財、黃美玉(2000)。台灣地區週休二日國內旅遊區隔之研究。觀光研究學報,5(2),1-20。
  35. 陳沛悌、林晏州(1997)。秀姑巒溪泛舟活動社會心理容許量之研究。戶外遊憩研究,10(3),19-36。
  36. 鄭健雄(2000)。休閒服務業的行銷聯盟類型與趨勢。2000年台北國際加盟研討會論文集,彰化縣:
  37. 鄭健雄(2001)。渡假民宿經營利基與行銷策略之研究。第三屆永續發展管理研討會論文集,屏東縣:
  38. 鄭健雄、劉孟奇(2002)。台灣本土化渡假生活型態量表信度與效度之檢定。第一屆服務業行銷暨管理學術研討會論文集,嘉義市:
  39. 鄭健雄、劉孟奇(2001)。墾丁地區遊客渡假生活型態與休閒消費行為之研究。台灣旅遊趨勢學術研討會論文集,臺北縣:
  40. 羅國瑜(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所未出版之碩士論文。