Title

配偶間政治態度一致性的分析

Translated Titles

An Analysis of Spousal Similarity in Political Attitudes in Taiwan

DOI

10.6683/TPSR.201806_22(1).0004

Authors

陳光輝(Kuang-hui Chen)

Key Words

政治社會化 ; 婚姻 ; 配偶 ; 政治態度 ; 調查研究 ; Political Socialization ; Marriage, Spouse ; Political Attitude ; Survey Research

PublicationName

台灣政治學刊

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

22卷1期(2018 / 06 / 01)

Page #

143 - 186

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本文主要目的在於藉由分析配對經驗資料評估配偶間對政治議題的態度一致性,以瞭解是否存有性別上的落差。使用的資料來源是於2011年6月執行的配對電話調查,共計有354對夫妻參與調查完成訪問。除了評估配偶間在政治態度上的一致性之外,我們進一步以配偶間婚後的互動狀況以及代表婚前社會化影響的相對教育程度與省籍背景等因素來解釋配偶間的政治態度一致性。整體而言,配偶間在政治議題上有一定的一致性。此外,夫妻間討論政治的頻率以及省籍背景對於彼此之間政治態度一致性存有顯著的關連性。本文的結論是配偶間政治態度的一致性同時來自婚前與婚後兩類因素的影響,但應有較多的政治態度一致性是婚前即已存在的。

English Abstract

This article is designed to assess whether husbands and wives have similar political attitudes in Taiwan. A telephone survey was conducted in June 2011, and a nationally representative sample was obtained with 354 pairs of husbands and wives being successfully interviewed. This paired survey data set was then analyzed to examine whether there existed a gender gap with regard to how people respond to survey questions on political issues. Furthermore, the observed similarity between husbands and wives was explained by the couples' marital characteristics that mainly focused on their frequencies and intensity of interactions as well as their ethnic background and educational attainment, which represented the lasting effect of early political socialization. It was found that couples in Taiwan have a certain amount of agreement in regard to their political attitudes. It was also found that ethnic background and discussions about politics between husbands and wives are positively related to spousal similarity in political attitudes. It was therefore concluded that although spousal similarity is shaped by both pre-marital as well as post-marital factors, most of the observed similarity already existed before marriage.

Topic Category 社會科學 > 政治學
Reference
  1. 吳乃德(2002)。認同衝突和政治信任:現階段台灣族群政治的核心難題。台灣社會學,4,75-118。
    連結:
  2. 吳重禮、崔曉倩(2010)。族群、賦權與選舉評價-2004年與2008年總統選舉省籍差異的實證分析。臺灣民主季刊,7(4),137-182。
    連結:
  3. 吳親恩、林政楠(2010)。省籍通婚與中國人、台灣人認同—家庭成員影響力的變化。政治學報,50,41-82。
    連結:
  4. 陳光輝(2011)。婚姻對身分認同之影響的初探。選舉研究,18(2),95-137。
    連結:
  5. 陳義彥、盛杏湲(2003)。政治分歧與政黨競爭:二OO一年立法委員選舉的分析。選舉研究,10(1),7-40。
    連結:
  6. 楊婉瑩(2009)。民族主義的父系家/族譜的繁衍與衰落:台灣個案的經驗。人文及社會科學集刊,21(2),291-323。
    連結:
  7. 楊婉瑩、李冠成(2011)。一個屋簷下的性別權力關係對國家認同的影響(1996-2008)。選舉研究,18(1),95-137。
    連結:
  8. 鄭夙芬(2009)。族群、認同與總統選舉投票抉擇。選舉研究,16(2),23-49。
    連結:
  9. 蕭怡靖(2014)。從政黨情感溫度計解析台灣民眾的政治極化。選舉研究,21(2),1-42。
    連結:
  10. Alford, John R.,Funk, Carolyn L.,Hibbing, John R.(2005).Are Political Orientation Genetically Transmitted?.The American Political Science Review,99(2),153-167.
  11. Alford, John R.,Hatemi, Peter K.,Hibbing, John R.,Martin, Nicholas G.,Eaves, Lindon J.(2011).The Politics of Mate Choice.The Journal of Politics,73(2),362-379.
  12. Campbell, Angus,Converse, Philip E.,Miller, Warren E.,Stokes, Donald(1960).The American Voter.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  13. Chen, Kuang-hui(2016).Unit Nonrespondents in a Taiwan Telephone Survey.Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research,3(3),111-130.
  14. Dinas, Elias(2014).Why Does the Apple Fall Far from the Tree? How Early Political Socialization Prompts Parent-Child Dissimilarity.British Journal of Political Science,44(4),827-852.
  15. Fell, Dafydd(ed.)(2013).Migration to and from Taiwan.London, UK:Routledge.
  16. Feng, Du,Baker, Laura(1994).Spouse Similarity in Attitudes, Personality, and Psychological Well-Being.Behavior Genetics,24,357-364.
  17. Green, Donald P.,Palmquist, Bradley,Schickler, Eric(2002).Partisan Hearts and Minds.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
  18. Hatemi, Peter K.,Alford, John R.,Hibbing, John R.,Martin, Nicholas G.,Eaves, Lindon J.(2009).Is There a 'Party' in Your Genes?.Political Research Quarterly,62,584-600.
  19. Hays, Bernadette C.,Bean, Clive S.(1994).Political Attitudes and Partisanship among Australian Couples: Do Wives Matter?.Women and Politics,14(1),53-80.
  20. Hays, Bernadette C.,Bean, Clive S.(1992).The Impact of Spousal Characteristics on Political Attitudes in Australia.The Public Opinion Quarterly,56(4),524-529.
  21. Healy, Andrew,Malhotra, Neil(2013).Childhood Socialization and Political Attitudes: Evidence from a National Experiment.The Journal of Politics,75(4),1023-1037.
  22. Klofstad, Casey A.,McDermott, Roe,Hatemi, Peter K.(2012).Do Bedroom Eyes Wear Political Glasses? The Role of Politics inhuman Mate Attraction.Evolution and Human Behavior,33,100-108.
  23. Klofstad, Casey A.,McDermott, Roe,Hatemi, Peter K.(2013).The Dating Preferences of Liberals and Conservatives.Political Behavior,35(3),519-538.
  24. Koo, Terry K.,Li, Mae Y.(2016).A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.Journal of Chiropractic Medicine,15,155-163.
  25. Lampard, Richard James(1997).Party Political Homogamy in Great Britain.European Sociological Review,13(1),79-99.
  26. Landis J. Richard,Koch, Gary G.(1977).The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.Biometrics,33,159-174.
  27. Plutzer, Eric,McBurnett, Michael(1991).Family Life and American Politics: The ‘Marriage Gap’ Reconsidered.The Public Opinion Quarterly,55(1),113-127.
  28. Portney, Leslie Gross,Watkins, Mary P.(2009).Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  29. Settle, Jaime E.,Dawes, Christopher T.,Fowler, James H.(2009).The Heritability of Partisan Attachment.Political Research Quarterly,62,601-613.
  30. Shultziner, Doron(2013).Genes and Politics: A New Explanation and Evaluation of Twin Study Results and Association Studies in Political Science.Political Analysis,21(3),350-367.
  31. Stoker, Laura, and Jennings, M. Kent(2005).Political Similarity and Influence between Husbands and Wives.The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior,Philadelphia, PA:
  32. Stoker, Laura,Jennings, M. Kent(1995).Life-cycle Transitions and Political Participation: The Case of Marriage.American Political Science Review,89(2),421-433.
  33. Watson, David,Klohnen, Eva C.,Casillas, Alex,Simms, Ericka Nus,Haig, Jeffrey,Berry, Diane S.(2004).Match Makers and Deal Breakers: Analyses of Assortative Mating in Newlywed Couples.Journal of Personality,72(5),1029-1068.
  34. Zuckerman, Alan S.,Fitzgerald, Jennifer ,Dasovi, Josip(2005).Do Couples Support the Same Political Parties? Sometimes: Evidence from British and German Household Panel Surveys.The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior,Philadelphia, PA:
  35. 王甫昌(2001)。台灣的族群通婚與族群關係再探。社會轉型與文化變貌:華人社會的比較,香港=Hong Kong:
  36. 王甫昌(1993)。族群通婚的後果:省籍通婚對於族群同化的影響。人文及社會科學集刊,6(1),231-267。
  37. 張翰璧(2007)。東南亞女性移民與台灣客家社會。台北=Taipei:中央研究院=Academia Sinica。
  38. 陳光輝(2012)。行政院國科會專題研究計畫行政院國科會專題研究計畫,台北=Taipei:行政院國科會=National Science Council。
  39. 劉明浩(2005)。台北=Taipei,國立政治大學東亞研究所=Graduate School of East Asian Studies, National Chengchi University。