透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.156.156
  • 期刊

國中生關係攻擊加害者與受害者之規範信念、同理心與因應策略

The Normative Beliefs, Empathy, and Interpersonal Coping Strategies of Relationally Aggressive Perpetrators and Victims in Junior High Schools

摘要


本研究旨在探討國中生關係攻擊加害者與受害者,相較於未涉入關係攻擊者,在關係攻擊規範信念、同理心,以及人際衝突因應策略上的異同。本研究以台北縣、市4所八年級學生為研究對象,共計964人(男生498人、女生466人)。使用的研究工具包括:「關係攻擊同儕提名問卷」、「關係攻擊受害經驗量表」、「同理心量表」及「規範信念與人際衝突因應策略情境式量表」。調查所得資料以描述性統計、卡方考驗、單因子變異數分析,以及多元逐步迴歸等統計方法處理。結果發現:一、在關係攻擊規範信念,關係攻擊受害者得分高於未涉入者,加害者與未涉入者間沒有差異;二、在同理心,關係攻擊受害者的得分高於未涉入者,加害者與未涉入者間沒有差異;三、在人際衝突因應策略,關係攻擊加害者與受害者在「負面情緒與自責」及「發洩情緒」因應策略上皆高於未涉入者;受害者在「尋求社會支持」策略上高於未涉入者,在「負面情緒與自責」策略上高於關係攻擊加害者;四、國中生的關係攻擊規範信念、同理心及人際衝突因應策略,可以有效預測其關係攻擊加害及受害程度。

並列摘要


The main purpose of this study was to investigate how the relationally aggressive and the relationally victimized adolescents differed from their counterparts of non-relational-aggression-involvement in terms of normative beliefs, empathy, and interpersonal coping strategies. The sample consisted of 964 8th-grade students (498 boys and 466 girls) from four junior high schools in Taipei area. The instruments used in this study were Relational Aggression Questionnaire-Peer Nomination, Victimization Experiences of Relational Aggression-Self Report Scale, The Interpersonal Reactivity Inventory, and The Questionnaire of Normative Beliefs about Relational Aggression and Interpersonal Coping Strategies. The data were analyzed by Chi-square, ANOVA, and Multiple Stepwise Regression.The main findings of this study were as follows: The relational victims were different from their counterparts of non-relational-aggression-involvement in terms of their normative beliefs, empathy, and the coping strategies. The relational aggressors, in contrast with the counterparts, were only dissimilar on some of the coping strategies. Overall, the variables of normative belief, empathy, and interpersonal coping strategy could predict the extent of relational aggression and relational victimization among junior-high-school students.

參考文獻


林慧姿、程景琳(2006)。國小六年級學童自尊、情緒調節與友誼之相關研究。教育心理學報。38(2),177-193。
(Cheng, C. L. (2008). Relational aggression questionnaire: Peer nomination.Unpublished instrument, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan).
Bailey, C. A.,Ostrov, J. M.(2008).Differentiating forms and functions of aggression in emerging adults: Associations with hostile attribution biases and normative beliefs.Journal of Youth Adolescence.37,713-722.
Bryant, B. K.(1982).An index of empathy for children and adolescents.Child Development.53,413-425.
Camodeca, M.,Goossens, F. A.(2005).Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims.Journal of Child Psychology Psychiatry.46,186-197.

被引用紀錄


張益慈、詹雨臻、陳學志(2021)。繁體中文版「簡式暗黑四特質量表」之發展與信效度考驗測驗學刊68(4),287-316。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=16094905-202112-202203310030-202203310030-287-316

延伸閱讀