史學與文體學視野下的論贊

Historical Commentaries (Lun and Zan) in the Field of Chinese Historiography and Stylistics

黃自鴻(Chi-Hung Wong)

《東吳中文學報》 31期 (2016/05) Pp. 33-53

摘要

論贊不單是歷史評論，更屬於表達作者意圖的一種方法。正史講求以實錄的形式記載史事，論贊本來只是主體的補充，卻慢慢成為歷史的重要部分，甚至是解讀史書（和撰述者）的主要依據。本文擬探討論贊體裁的特點、撰寫態度並與傳統史學的觀點比較，欲指出論贊的「含混屬性」，它一方面與史學實錄的要求不符，一方面作者又無法不對史事進行討論；它既是傳記文的附錄，卻又是文本的靈魂載體。

關鍵字

論贊 ； 正史 ； 《史通》 ； 文體學 ； 《文心雕龍》

並列摘要

Historical commentaries (lun and zan) are not only reviews of history but also a sensible method of expressing. Official histories are normally required to record the facts in plain language, and at the same time historical commentaries are interpreted as supplements to the main body of biography, yet they are the keys to let us explore the main body in history as well as a thorough understanding of the authors. This paper attempts to discuss the features of the genre of lun and zan and their writing attitudes, in order to point out that the ＂ambiguous attribute＂ of historical commentaries. On one hand lun and zan are contradictory to the principle of ＂to record history faithfully＂; on the other hand, the authors need to comment on the past for lun and zan are the appendices, most importantly, they are the soul carrier of the aforementioned works.

並列關鍵字

historical commentaries (lun and zan) ； official histories ； Shitong ； stylistics ； Wenxin Diaolong

參考文獻

柯慶明(2012)。「傳」「狀」作為文學類型之美感特質。清華中文學報。7，3-59。

﹝宋﹞歐陽修著，﹝宋﹞徐無黨注：《五代史》，順治十三年汲古閣本

(1997)。四庫全書存目叢書。臺南縣柳營鄉:莊嚴文化事業有限公司。

宋姚鉉(1972)。唐文粹。臺北:世界書局。

宋蘇洵、邱少華點校(2000)。蘇洵集。北京:中國書店。