Title

臺北市教學輔導教師方案的功能-代理教師觀點

Translated Titles

The Function of Taipei City's Mentor Teacher Program from Substitute Teachers' Viewpoint

DOI

10.7044/NHCUEA.201006.0033

Authors

張民杰(Min-Chieh Chang)

Key Words

教學輔導教師 ; 代理教師 ; 臺北市教學輔導教師方案 ; mentor teacher ; substitute teacher ; Taipei City's Mentor Teacher Program

PublicationName

新竹教育大學教育學報

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

27卷1期(2010 / 06 / 01)

Page #

33 - 60

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

臺北市中小學教學輔導教師設置方案實施已滿九年,但代理教師於2006年才成為方案的成員。本研究之目的在透過代理教師的觀點,了解此方案的功能,研究方法採取訪談法,研究對象為參與方案的12位國中小代理教師。訪談結果發現:1.代理教師獲得教學輔導教師的協助事項,包括:特有身分困擾的協助處理、親師互動的請益、認識學校的環境和成員、學生狀況與班級經營的熟悉、教學設計與技巧的協助、參加教師甄選的鼓勵和協助等。2.教學輔導教師的協助是靠制度、具系統性,且是檯面上的;3.受訪的代理教師都能感受制度的協助,尤其是心理支持的功能。

English Abstract

The mentor teacher program had been implemented for nine years in Taipei municipal elementary and secondary schools already. There are some studies had proved the effectiveness and efficiency of this program. The substitute teachers had become the new members of this program since four years ago. The purpose of this research was to understand the functions of mentor teacher program from substitute teachers' viewpoints. The method of this study adopted the interviewing of general interview guide approach. Twelve substitute teachers who were involved in this program accepted two interviews in this study. The results of this study were as follows: First, this program would be helpful not only for solving the trouble of substitute teacher's identity but also for improving parent-teacher communication and interaction among school's staff and students. In addition, it would increase their skills for teaching and teacher selection. Second, this program would provide systematic assistance for mentor teacher. Third, these interviewees considered that the program was useful, especially in providing mental supporting.

Topic Category 社會科學 > 教育學
Times Cited
  1. 陳佳妏(2014)。以情感事件理論檢視工作壓力、情緒與溝通策略間之關係-以台灣國小流浪教師為例。交通大學理學院科技與數位學習學程學位論文。2014。1-118。 
  2. 陳怡吟(2015)。桃園縣國中英語教師教學壓力與因應策略之相關研究─比較正式教師與代理教師之差異。中原大學應用外語研究所學位論文。2015。1-119。 
  3. 洪琪涵(2012)。我國代理教師權益保障之研究。臺灣大學國家發展研究所學位論文。2012。1-135。 
  4. 張家瑋(2016)。臺北市國中教學輔導教師制度實施成效之調查研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士在職專班學位論文。2016。1-126。