Title

Conceptualizing Medical Students' Self-directed Learning in the Clinical Setting - A Qualitative Study in Taiwan

DOI

10.6145/jme.202203_26(1).0002

Authors

Tzu-Hung Liu;Kai-Kuen Leung;Amy Marie Sullivan

Key Words

self-directed learning ; clinical setting ; medical students ; qualitative interviews ; content analysis

PublicationName

醫學教育

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

26卷1期(2022 / 03 / 01)

Page #

46 - 58

Content Language

英文

Chinese Abstract

Clinical teachers have regarded self-directed learning (SDL) as an essential means of enabling students to take responsibility for their learning throughout clinical training. However, SDL in the clinical setting in Taiwan has not yet been described in the literature. Purpose: This study aims to illustrate Taiwanese student experiences of SDL in their clinical training and identify how local socio-cultural contexts differ from our previous study in the U.S. Methods: To conceptualize students' SDL experiences in the clinical setting, we conducted a qualitative study with 15 Taiwanese medical students at National Taiwan University College of Medicine. The semi-structured interviews were recorded and transcribed. Data were analyzed deductively and inductively using the Framework method of content analysis and our existing conceptual SDL model. Results: Our study showed that the essential themes across three SDL dimensions and six major steps in the process dimension in the contexts of Taiwan were compatible with the conceptual SDL model in our previous study in the U.S. While there were many similarities across the Taiwanese and American groups, some consistent differences emerged. When conducting SDL, American students tended to focus more on individual performance. Taiwanese students were strongly oriented to learning in a collaborative team and with their peers but avoided standing out when learning in a group. Conclusions: Our study contributes to the current SDL models with perspectives of the Taiwanese students and supports the applicability of "Person, Process, Context" dimensions of SDL. The findings in each SDL dimension also provide practical implications for clinical faculty and students in Taiwan.

Topic Category 醫藥衛生 > 醫藥總論
社會科學 > 教育學
Reference
  1. Murad MH, Varkey P: Self-directed learning in health professions education. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008; 37: 580-90.
  2. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a Medical School: Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the MD Degree. Association of American Medical Colleges and the American Medical Association. http://lcme.org/publications/ Published October 2021. Accessed January 27, 2022.
  3. Knowles MS. Self-directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. New York, NY: Association Press, 1975.
  4. Brockett RG, Hiemstra R. Self-Direction in Adult Learning: Perspectives on Theory, Research, and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge, 1991.
  5. Candy PC. Self-direction for lifelong learning: a comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
  6. Hiemstra R, Brockett RG: Reframing the meaning of self-directed learning: An updated model. Paper presented at: Adult Education Research Conference 2012; Saratoga Springs, NY.
  7. Shokar GS, Shokar NK, Romero CM, et al.: Self-directed learning: looking at outcomes with medical students. Fam Med. 2002; 34: 197-200.
  8. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R, eds. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.
  9. Burk-Rafel J, Santen SA, Purkiss J: Study behaviors and USMLE Step 1 performance: implications of a student self-directed parallel curriculum. Acad Med 2017; 92(11S): S67-S74.