Title

臺灣版精神分裂症病人生活品質評量表:信度與效度之研究

Translated Titles

The Taiwanese Version of the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile (T-LQOLP): Reliability and Validity

DOI

10.29478/TJP.200503.0004

Authors

許嘉純(Chia-Chun Hsu);姚開屏(Kai-Ping Grace Yao);胡海國(Hai-Gwo Hwu);熊秉荃(Ping-Chuan Hsiung)

Key Words

精神分裂症 ; 主觀生活品質 ; 客觀生活品質 ; schizophrenia ; subjective and objective quality of life

PublicationName

臺灣精神醫學

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

19卷1期(2005 / 03 / 01)

Page #

33 - 46

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

目的:本研究目的是在檢測臺灣版精神分裂症病人生活品質量表(LQOLP)之信、效度,並探討人口學特質、精神症狀、醫療環境與病人生活品質間的關係。方法:樣本來自北部某醫學中心精神科日間病房及門診之精神分裂症病人100名,進行量表信、效度之檢定,結果:本評量表各層面主觀生活品質Cronbach’s, a範圍0.53-0.82,再測信度ICC範圍0.60-0.92。本評量表與SF-36及LQOLP量表中三項綜合評量題目兩項效標工具間具有顯著相關,亦具有良好之建構效度。探索性因素分析發現六個因素(家庭關係、健康與安全、經濟、自主與安適、社交關係、休閒),病人主觀生活滿意度中,以家庭關係層面最佳,工作及經濟兩層面最差,研究發現情緒及負性症狀、醫療環境、婚姻狀況為分居者、年齡20-30歲,是影響病人主觀生活品質之重要預測因子。結論:研究結果有助於瞭解病人多層面主、客觀生活品質,可用為精神衛生政策擬定之參考,有利於精神分裂症病人生活品質之本土性資料建立,以為未來跨文化比較研究之基礎。

English Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and test the reliability and validity of the Taiwanese version of Lancashire Quality of Life Profile(T-LQOLP). The relationship between demographic factors, psychotic symptoms, care settings, and quality of life (QOL) of patients with schizophrenia were also be examined. Methods: One hundred patients with schizophrenia were recruited from patients who were receiving hospital day care or were treated in an outpatient setting of a university hospital in Taipei. Data were collected by personal interview after written informed consent was obtained. Results: The T-LQOLP was established after linguistic modification. The internal consistency (Cronbach’s a) ranged from 0.53 to 0.82 for the nine subjective QOL domains. The test-retest reliability ICCs ranged from 0.60 to 0.92 in the nine subjective QOL domains. The SF-36 and three items from the T-LQOLP were used as the criterion-related validity tools. The T-LQOLP had significant correlations between the two scales, and had satisfactory contruct validity. Exploratory factor analyses revealed a six-factor (family relations, health and safety, finance, autonomy and well-being, social relations, and leisure) model. Among the nine subjective QOL domains, the highest satisfaction domain was family relations, while the lowest satisfaction domains were work and finance. The best factors in predicting subjective QOL were affect symptoms, care setting, separate marital status, age range of 20-3 0 years, and negative symptoms. Conclusions: This study has successfully established the T-LQOLP by demonstrating its satisfactory reliability and validity. This instrument is applicable for use in Taiwanese patients with schizophrenia. The T-LQOLP can also be served as a rating scale for cross-cultural study and as a tool for clinical psychiatric assessment in Taiwan. (Full text in Chinese)

Topic Category 醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
Reference
  1. 姚開屏(2000)。簡介與評論常用的一般健康相關生活品質量表兼談對未來研究的建議。測驗年刊,47,111-38。
    連結:
  2. Bowne D,Roe M,Lane A,Gervin M,Kinsella A,Larkin C,Callaghan EO(1996).Quality of life in schizophrenia: Relationship to sociodemographic factors, symptomatology and tardive dyskinesia.Acta Psychiatr Scand,94,118-24.
  3. Bow-Thomas CC,Velligan DI,Miller AL,Olsen J(1999).Predicting quality of life from symptomatology in schizophrenia at exacerbation and stabilization.Psychiatry Res,86,131-42.
  4. Campbell A(1976).Subjective measures of well-being.Am Psychol,31,117-24.
  5. Gaite L,Vazquez-Barquero JL,Arriaga Arrizabalaga A.Quality of life in schizophrenia: development, reliability and internal consistency of the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile-European Version.Br J Psychiatry 200,177,49-54.
  6. Gaite L,Vazquez-Barquero JL,Borra C(2002).Quailty of life in patients with schizophrenia in five European countries: The EPSILON.Acta Psychiatr Scand,105,283-92.
  7. Jarema M,Bury L,Konieczynska Z(1997).Comparison of quality of life of schizophrenic patients in different forms of psychiatric care.Psychiatr Pol,31,585-94.
  8. Lehman AF,Ward NC,Linn LS(1982).Chronic mental patients: the quality of life issue.Am J Psychiatry,139,1271-6.
  9. McHorney CA,Ware JJ,Raczek AE(1993).The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): Ⅱ. Psychomertic and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.Med Care,31,247-63.
  10. McHorney, CA,Ware JJ,Rachel IF,Scherbourne CD(1994).The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): Ⅲ. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.Med Care,32,40-66.
  11. Meijer CJ,Schene AH,Kotete MWJ(2002).Quality of life in schizophrenia measured by the MOS SF-36 and the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile: a comparison.Acta Psychiatr Scand,105,293-300.
  12. Mueser KT,Becker DR,Torrey WC,Xie H,Bond GR,Drake RE(1997).Working and nonvocational domains of functioning in preson with severe mental illness: a longitudinal analysis.J Nerv Ment Dis,185,419-26.
  13. Nieuwenhuizen van Ch,Schene AH,Koeter MW,Huxley PJ(2001).The Lanacashire Quality of Life Profile: Modification and psychometric evaluation.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol,36,36-44.
  14. Oliver JP(1992).The social care directive: Development of a quality of life profile for use in community services for the mentally ill.Soc Work Soc Sc Rev,3,5-45.
  15. Oliver JP,Huxley PJ,Bridges K,Mohamad H(1996).Quality of Life and Mental Health Services.
  16. Ruggeri M,Bisoff G,Fonyecedro L,Warner R(2001).Subjective and objective of quality of life in psychiatric patients: a factor analytical approach: The South Verona Outcome Project 4.Br J Psychiatry,178,268-75.
  17. Russo J,Trujillo CA,Wingerson D(1998).The MOS 36-item short form health survey reality validity, and preliminary finding in schizophrenic outpatients.Med Care,36,752-6.
  18. Salokangas RKR,Honkonen T,Stengard E,Koivisto AM(2001).To be or not to be married that is the question of quality of life in men with schizophrenia.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol,36,381-90.
  19. Tunis JE,Croghan TW,Meilman DK,Johnstone BM,Obenchain RL(1999).Reality, validity, and application of the Medical Outcome Study 36-item short- form health survey (SF36) in schizophrenia patients treated with olanzapine versus haloperidol.Med Care,37,678-91.
  20. Van Dongen CJ(1996).Quality of life and self-esteem in working and nonworking persons with mental illness.Comm Ment Health J,36,535-48.
  21. 成和玲、楊美賞(1997)。門診與社區復健精神分裂病患生活品質之比較及影響生活品質之因素。高雄醫學科學雜誌,13,748-56。
  22. 余伍祥、陳明哲、成和玲、林清華(1995)。不同醫療環境精神分裂病病人生活品質之比較。公共衛生,22,115-23。
  23. 余伍祥、陳明哲、成和玲、林清華、龍佛衛(1995)。精神病病人生活品質量表之發展。公共衛生,22,29-39。
  24. 林進嘉、殷建智、李添誠、謝秀幸(2001)。日間留院及居家治療之精神分裂症病人生活品質之比較。台灣精神醫學,15,226-36。
  25. 胡海國(1997)。全國精神分裂一年中住院病人再次住院次數分析。當代醫學,24,964-8。
  26. 梁玉雯、蔣欣欣、李從業、吳玫勳、嚴小燕、崔翔雲(1997)。慢性精神病病人客觀生活品質之探討。護理研究,5,212-22。
  27. 蕭淑貞。衛生署八十四年度委託計劃研究報告衛生署八十四年度委託計劃研究報告,未出版
  28. 戴傳文(1998)。我國精神衛生工作的發展。護理雜誌,45,5-11。
Times Cited
  1. 陳玲珠(2013)。臺北市住宿型精神復健機構精神分裂症住民生活品質探討。淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班學位論文。2013。1-118。 
  2. 張志豪(2008)。公共工程受災破壞模式與原因之分類與統計。臺北科技大學土木與防災研究所學位論文。2008。1-102。 
  3. 吳毓慧(2012)。探討機構住民身心機能活化方案介入之成效: 以慢性精神分裂症患者為例。臺北醫學大學護理學系碩士暨碩士在職專班學位論文。2012。1-123。 
  4. 黃秋敏(2011)。探討慢性精神疾病患者戒菸方案之成效:以跨理論模式為基礎。臺北醫學大學護理學系碩士暨碩士在職專班學位論文。2011。1-218。 
  5. 徐夢舷(2013)。精神醫療社工工作與家庭平衡之探究。屏東科技大學社會工作系學位論文。2013。1-81。 
  6. 吳佩璠(2012)。中文版睡眠困擾量表(神經疾患生活品質)的心理計量品質研究。臺灣大學職能治療研究所學位論文。2012。1-154。 
  7. 林靜蘭(2007)。疾病管理模式於重返社區之精神分裂症病患 的成效性研究。臺灣大學護理學研究所學位論文。2007。1-211。 
  8. 楊明山(2007)。中文版意志量表之信度與效度研究。臺灣大學職能治療研究所學位論文。2007。1-91。 
  9. 王淑清(2006)。精神分裂症患者生活品質之追蹤研究。臺灣大學護理學研究所學位論文。2006。1-124。 
  10. 張孟卿(2005)。腦部傷害病患生活品質問卷中文版信度,效度與感應度之評估。臺北醫學大學傷害防治學研究所學位論文。2005。1-38。
  11. 余姿瑩(2006)。精神分裂症患者需要狀況之生活品質與主要照顧者負荷之探討研究。亞洲大學長期照護研究所學位論文。2006。1-245。
  12. 張靜琪(2006)。精神分裂症病患知覺烙印感、自我掌控信念、社會支持與生活品質之相關性探討。臺灣大學護理學研究所學位論文。2006。1-140。
  13. 施雅雯(2009)。探討精神社區復健機構慢性精神分裂病患之充權感受及生活品質。臺北醫學大學護理學系碩士暨碩士在職專班學位論文。2009。1-118。
  14. 黃嘉莉(2012)。康復模式應用在慢性住院精神病人效應-中部某精神專科教學醫院。中臺科技大學健康產業管理研究所學位論文。2012。1-182。
  15. 劉玲君(2014)。以詮釋觀點探討精神障礙者的復元歷程。臺北大學社會工作學系學位論文。2014。1-150。
  16. 林盈彣(2017)。初探慢性思覺失調症病患所背負之社會角色與功能在性別上的差異:從家屬的經驗談起。中國醫藥大學護理學系碩士班學位論文。2017。1-198。