Translated Titles

Effects of Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies on Reading for Third Graders: A Local Practice of Differentiated Instruction




孔淑萱(Shu-Hsuan Kung)

Key Words

同儕輔助學習策略 ; 差異化教學 ; 初級介入 ; Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) ; differentiated instruction ; Tier I intervention



Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

22卷2期(2019 / 04 / 01)

Page #

205 - 233

Content Language


Chinese Abstract

本研究目的有二個層面,首先引進國外具實證支持的同儕輔助學習策略(Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies,PALS)於國內閱讀課程教學中,探索該差異化教學於本土運用之可行性。其次,透過於普通班中實施PALS教學,檢視其初級介入(Tire I)之實徵成效,作為教師在選取證據本位教學(evidence-based instruction)之參考。研究對象為國小三年級48位學生,採準實驗研究設計,隨機分派成實驗組與控制組。實驗組接受每週二節、為期10週之PALS閱讀教學,控制組則採原班教學,於教學前後接受語文表現之標準化、自編前後測驗及問卷調查。結果顯示,實驗組學生在口語朗讀流暢度與閱讀理解的表現優於控制組學生(效果值η^2分別為.147與.122),國語科月考則無顯著差異。此外,教學後實驗組比控制組在疑似閱讀障礙學生的比率上降幅較大,上述結果初步提供PALS閱讀教學對初級介入差異化教學之成效。依據結果研究者進一步提出相關討論與建議。

English Abstract

This research aims to investigate two concerns in education in Taiwan, including any effects from Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) and effects from Tier I intervention applied to reading classes in the differentiated instruction. In the study, 48 3rd-graders were randomly assigned into experimental and control groups. PALS reading instruction was implemented to the former group for 10 weeks, and the latter one stayed with their original instruction. Results showed that the experimental group learners outperformed those in the control group in terms of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension (η2 = .147 and .122, respectively). Moreover, the proportion of at-risk students with reading in the experimental group got reduced more than those in the control group. These support the effectiveness of PALS reading instruction at the Tier I differential instruction for Chinese-speaking students. Some discussions and suggestions were further followed.

Topic Category 社會科學 > 教育學
  1. 呂偉白(2014)。美國多層次補救教學鑑定模式之評析。當代教育研究季刊,22(1),87-126。
  2. 李崗,徐美雲(2016)。「說故事」學英語:實施差異化教學對偏鄉國中學生的影響。課程與教學季刊,19(4),159-190。
  3. 洪儷瑜,何淑玫(2010)。「介入反應」在特殊教育的意義與運用。特殊教育季刊,115,1-13。
  4. 洪儷瑜,曾瓊禛,孫瑜成,李思慧,陳秀芬(2016)。國中語文精進教材處遇精準度研究。特殊教育研究學刊,41(3),1-34。
  5. 崔夢萍(2006)。運用同儕協助學習策略於國小融合教育國語文學習之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,30,27-52。
  6. 莊惠如,王菀詩,吳怡慧(2014)。同異質分組並行差異化教學。中等教育,65(3),117-131。
  7. 郭靜姿(2013)。如何實施資優學生的區分性教學?。資優教育季刊,127,1-11。
  8. 陳奕卉,孔淑萱(2016)。同儕協助學習策略對提升國小學習障礙學生閱讀理解成效之研究。特教論壇,21,1-25。
  9. 陳淑麗,曾世杰,張毓仁(2015)。國小二年級不同補救教學方案之實施與成效之比較:攜手計畫與永齡希望小學。當代教育研究季刊,23(2),35-74。
  10. 陳淑麗,曾世杰,張毓仁,蔡佩津(2017)。永齡國語文補救教學方案及補救教師專業背景對國小二年級學生讀寫進展之成效研究。特殊教育研究學刊,42(2),85-112。
  11. 陳靜怡(2012)。差異分組式平衡閱讀教學對國小學童英語認字、閱讀理解能力與閱讀態度之影響。英語教學期刊,36(2),125-163。
  12. 蘇宜芬,張祐瑄,李孟峰,黃鈺茜(2016)。國小二至六年級朗讀流暢度篩檢準確度及切截點分析。教育科學研究期刊,61(4),33-57。
  13. Al Otaiba, S.,Fuchs, D.(2002).Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature.Remedial and Special Education,23,300-315.
  14. Al Otaiba, S.,Reem, A.(2018).Building Arabic reading skills: Feasibility of peer-assisted learning strategies.2018 Annual Conference for the Scientific Studies of Reading (SSSR),Brighton, United Kingdom:
  15. Arends, R. I.,Kilcher, A.(2010).Teaching for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher.New York, NY:Routledge.
  16. Campbell, F. A.,Ramey, C. T.,Pungello, E.,Sparlin, H.,Johnson, S. M.(2002).Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes for the abecedarian project.Applied Developmental Science,6(1),42-57.
  17. Delquadri, J.,Greenwood, C. R.,Whorton, D.,Carta, J. J.,Hall, R. V.(1986).Classwide peer tutoring.Exceptional Children,52,535-542.
  18. Deno, S. L.(1985).Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative.Exceptional Children,52(3),219-232.
  19. Dunn, B.(2009).,未出版
  20. Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.(2003).Peer-assisted learning strategies for accelerating achievements in reading and math.Nashville, TN:Vanderbilt University, Peabody College.
  21. Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.(1998).Researchers and teachers working together to adapt instruction for diverse learners.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,13,126-137.
  22. Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.,Mathes, P. G.,MaRTInez, E.(2002).Preliminary evidence on the social standing of students with learning disabilities in PALS and No-PALS classrooms.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,17(4),205-215.
  23. Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.,Mathes, P. H.,Simmons, D. C.(1997).Peer-assisted strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity.American Educational Research Journal,34,174-206.
  24. Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.,Simmons, D.,Mathes, P.(2008).Peer-assisted learning Strategies: Reading methods for grades 2-6.Nashville, TN:Vanderbilt University, Peabody College.
  25. Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.,Thompson, A.,Al Otaiba, S.,Yen, L.,Yang, N.,Braun, M.,O’Connor, R.(2001).Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers.Journal of Educational Psychology,93,251-267.
  26. Fuchs, D.,Hendricks, E.,Walsh, M.,Fuchs, L.,Gilbert, J.(2018).Evaluating a multidimensional reading comprehension program and reconsidering the lowly reputation of tests of near-transfer.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,33(1),11-23.
  27. Fuchs, L. S.,Fuchs, D.,Hamlett, C. L.,Hope, S. K.,Capizzi, A. M.,Craddock, C. F.,Brothers, R. L.(2006).Extending responsiveness-to-intervention to math problem-solving at third grade.Teaching Exceptional Children,4,56-63.
  28. Fuchs, L. S.,Fuchs, D.,Kazdan, S.,Allen, S.(1999).Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies in reading with and without training in elaborated help giving.The Elementary School Journal,99(3),201-219.
  29. Fuchs, L. S.,Seethaler, P. M.,Powell, S. R.,Fuchs, D.,Hamlett, C. L.,Fletcher, J. M.(2008).Effects of preventative tutoring on the mathematical problem solving of third-grade students with math and reading difficulties.Exceptional Children,74(2),155-175.
  30. Gadke, C. A.(2001).Ohio,Kent State University.
  31. Greenwood, C. R.,Arreaga-Mayer, C.,Utley, C.,Gavin, K.,Terry, B.(2001).Classwide peer tutoring learning management system: Application with elementary-level English language learners.Remedial and Special Education,22,34-47.
  32. Gregory, G.,Chapman, C.(2013).Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn't fit all.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
  33. Hallahan, D. P.,Lloyd, J. W.,Kauffman, J. M.,Weiss, M. P.,Martinez, E. A.(2005).Learning disabilities: Foundations, characteristics, and effective teaching.Boston, MA:Pearson Education.
  34. Hillier, E.(2011).Demystifying differentiation for the elementary music classroom.Music Educators Journal,97(4),49-54.
  35. Jimerson, S. R.(Ed.),Burns, M. K.(Ed.),Van Der Heyden, A. M.(Ed.)(2016).Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support.New York, NY:Springer.
  36. Jung, P.,McMaster, K. L.,Kunkel, A. K.,Shin, J.,Stecker, P.(2018).Effects of data-based individualization for students with intensive learning needs: A meta-analysis.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,33(3),144-155.
  37. Kroeger, S. D.,Kouche, B.(2006).Using peer-assisted learning strategies to increase response to intervention in inclusive middle math settings.Teaching Exceptional Children,38(5),6-13.
  38. MaRTIn, M. R.,Pickett, M. T.(2013).,未出版
  39. Mathes, P. G.,Howard, J. K.,Allen, S. H.,Fuchs, D.(1998).Peer-assisted learning strategies for first-grade readers: Responding to the needs of diverse learners.Reading Research Quarterly,33,62-94.
  40. McMaster K. L.,Kung, S. H.,Han, I.,Cao, M.(2008).Peer-assisted learning strategies: A "tier 1" approach to promoting English learners’ response to intervention.Exceptional Children,74(2),194-214.
  41. McMaster, K. L.,Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.(2006).Research on peer-assisted learning strategies: The promise and limitations of peer-mediated instruction.Reading & Writing Quarterly,22(1),5-25.
  42. McMaster, K. L.,Han, I.,Cooling-Chaffin, M.,Fuchs, D.(2013).Promoting teachers’ use of scientifically based instruction: A comparison of university versus district support.The Elementary School Journal,113(3),303-330.
  43. Miller, D.,Topping, K.,Thurston, A.(2010).Peer tutoring in reading: The effects of role and organization on two dimensions of self-esteem.The British of Educational Psychology,80,417-433.
  44. Noell, G. H.,Gansle, K. A.(2006).Assuring the form has substance: Treatment plan implementation as the foundation of assessing response to intervention.Assessment for Effective Intervention,32(1),32-39.
  45. Obidoa, M. A.,Eskay, M.,Catherine, O.(2013).Remedial help in inclusive classrooms: Gender differences in the enhancement of mathematics achievement of students through PAL (Peer-Assisted Learning).US-China Education Review A,3(3),172-180.
  46. Obidoa, M. A.,Onwubolu, C. O.(2011).The effect of peer-assisted learning on high and low achieving students in mathematics.The Annual National Conference of the Nigerian National Centre for Exceptional Children,Sokoto, Nigeria:
  47. Perkins, D. N.,Solomon, G.(1988).Teaching for transfer.Educational Leadership,46(1),22-32.
  48. Pétursdóttir, A.(2018).Research on kindergarten Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (K-PALS) in Iceland.2018 Annual Conference for the Scientific Studies of Reading (SSSR),Brighton, United Kingdom:
  49. Pham, HL.(2012).Differentiated instruction and the need to integrate teaching and practice.Journal of College Teaching & Learning,9(1),13-20.
  50. Rafdal, B. H.,McMaster, K. L.,McConnell, S. R.,Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.(2011).The effectiveness of kindergarten peer-assisted learning strategies for students with disabilities.Exceptional Children,77,299-316.
  51. Scruggs, T. E.,Mastropieri, M. A,Marshak, M.(2012).Peer mediated instruction in inclusive secondary social studies: Direct and indirect learning effects.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,27,12-20.
  52. Servilio, K. L.(2009).You get to choose! motivating students to read through differentiated instruction.TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus,5(5)
  53. Steedly, K.,Dragoo, K.,Arafeh. S.,Luke, S. D.(2008).Effective mathematics instruction.Evidence for Education,3(1),1-11.
  54. Tomlinson, C. A.(2012).How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classroom.Alexandra, VA:ASCD.
  55. Topping, K. J.(Ed.),Ehly, S.(Ed.)(1998).Peer-assisted learning.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  56. Torgesen, J. K.(2000).Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problems of treatment resisters.Learning Disabilities Research and Practices,15(1),55-64.
  57. Utley, C. A.(2001).Introduction to the special series: Advances in peer-mediated instruction and interventions in the 21st century.Remedial and Special Education,22(1),2-3.
  58. Vardy, E.(2018).Evaluation of grade 2-6 PALS with year 5 pupils in the UK.2018 Annual Conference for the Scientific Studies of Reading (SSSR),Brighton, United Kingdom:
  59. Vasay, E. T.(2010).The effects of peer teaching in the performance of students in mathematics.E-international Scientific Research Journal,2(2),161-171.
  60. 吳清山(2012,4 月 15 日)。差異化教學與學生學習。國家教育研究院電子報,38。取自 http://epaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=38&content_no=1011
  61. 吳清山,林天祐(2007)。區別化教學。教育研究月刊,154,172。
  62. 呂昀真,盧東華(2011)。即時回饋機制融入同儕教學法對國小高年級學童閱讀理解學習之研究。國教新知,58(1),52-68。
  63. 李宜倫(2015)。臺北市,國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班。
  64. 孟瑛如,魏銘志,田仲閔,周文聿(2015).國民小學一至三年級閱讀理解診斷測驗.臺北市:心理.
  65. 林素貞(2013)。差異化教學與成功學習。教育研究月刊,233,49-60。
  66. 胡永崇(2016)。數據本位教學的意涵及其在國小資源班語文科之應用。南屏特殊教育,7,69-82。
  67. 翁惠婷,簡雅臻(2015)。國小五年級英語差異化教學學習成就之探討。國民教育,55(2),60-81。
  68. 郭秀緞,何佳真,蘇淑英(2013)。高雄市政府 102 年度研究發展成果報告高雄市政府 102 年度研究發展成果報告,高雄市:高雄市政府教育局。
  69. 傅學海,王貞琇(2013)。談差異化教學實例:竿影看週日運動與季節關係。教育研究月刊,233,79-94。
  70. 葉俐君,賴翠媛(2009)。協助資優班教師設計實作評量。資優教育季刊,109,11-21。
  71. 葉錫南(2013)。英語科差異化教學之理念與實施。教育研究月刊,233,37-48。
  72. 詹惠雪(2012)。十二年國民基本教育五堂課—差異化教學。十二年國民基本教育差異化教學學術研討會,臺北市:
  73. 詹惠雪,林曉音(2014)。差異化教學運用在國小六年級數學領域之實踐歷程。教育研究月刊,245,130-148。
  74. 謝文英(2014)。中小學教師差異化教學策略。教師天地,190,51-57。