Title

課程目標認同傾向與教學計畫之探討:以“健康與體育”學習領域第一學習階段為例

Translated Titles

The Identification Tendency towards Curriculum Goals and Instruction Planning: The Health and Physical Education Learning Area for the First Learning Level

DOI

10.5297/ser.200609_8(3).0002

Authors

廖智倩(Chih-Chien Liao);闕月清(Keh Nyit Chin)

Key Words

課程目標 ; 認同傾向 ; 教學計畫 ; curriculum goals ; identification tendency ; instruction planning

PublicationName

大專體育學刊

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

8卷3期(2006 / 09 / 30)

Page #

27 - 37

Content Language

繁體中文;英文

Chinese Abstract

課程目標是教學的指南,而教學計畫是教學前的安排和設計,其目的在協助教師教學的實施,這兩者對教師從事教學有深遠的影響。本研究旨在以九年一貫課程「健康與體育」學習領域為例,探討教師課程目標認同傾向的情形,及影響其與教學計畫差異之因素。本研究以立意取樣的八位擔任「健康與體育」學習領域第一學習階段(一至三年級)的小學教師為研究參與者,用Q方法、訪談和文件分析進行資料蒐集與分析。所獲致的結果如下:(一)課程目標認同傾向高順位前三名依序為運動參與、生長發展、人與食物;低順位前三名依序為群體健康、運動技能、安全生活;(二)課程目標認同傾向與教學計畫所形成的差異,受學生、教師、學校行政人員、場地設備、服務地區等因素的影響。根據以上的發現,教師的課程目標認同傾向會影響他們的教學計畫,此外,瞭解課程目標認同傾向和教學計畫的情形及之間的差異,相信能提供教師專業成長與教育行政單位之參考。

English Abstract

The purpose of instruction planning was to help teachers to consider the implementation of teaching. Both of these had a great impact on teaching. This study investigated the discrepancies between identification tendency towards curriculum goals and instruction planning in the ”Health and Physical Education Learning Area”, and the influential factors which caused the discrepancies. The participants of this study included 8 elementary teachers. Data collection included the Q-sort method, interviews and documents. The results were as follows. First, the top three precedences of the identification tendency towards curriculum goals were sports participation, growth development, humans and food. The lowest three precedences of the identification tendency towards curriculum goals were group health, sports skills and safe life. Second, the discrepancies of the identification tendency towards curriculum goals and instruction planning were affected by students, teachers, school administration, field and equipment, school community and others. Based on these findings, teacher's identification tendency towards the curriculum goals would directly affect their instruction planning. Therefore, the understanding of the differences between identification tendency towards curriculum goals and instruction planning could be used as a reference for teacher professional development and education administrative unit.

Topic Category 社會科學 > 體育學
Reference
  1. 廖智倩(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
    連結:
  2. Bhullar, J.,Chelladurai, P.(1988).Priorities of intercollegiate sports: Perceptions of staff and students in selected Indian college comparison with results in Canadian studies.Journal of Comparative Physical Education and Sport Cross Cultural and International Studies,10(2),12-20.
  3. Byra, M.,Coulon, S. C.(1994).The effect of planning on the instructional behaviors of preservice teachers.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,13,123-139.
  4. Chou, H. S.(1989).U.S.A,University of Georgia.
  5. Chou, H. S.(1989).U.S.A.,University of Georgia.
  6. Clark, C. M.,Yinger, R. J.(1979).Three studies of teacher planning (Research Series No.55).East Lansing, MI:Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
  7. Clark, C. M.,Yinger, R. J.(1979).Three studies of teacher planning,55
  8. Goc-Karp, G.,Zakrajsek, D. B.(1987).Planning for learning-Theory into practice.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,6(4),377-392.
  9. Hoover, N. L.(1985).Teachers` self-reports of critical decisions in teaching reading.Reading Teacher,38,440-445.
  10. Kirchner, C.,Fishburne, G. J.(1995).Physical education for elementary school children.Wm. C. Brown Communications, Inc.
  11. Kirchner, C.,Fishburne, G. J.(1995).Physical education for elementary school children.Wm. C. Brown Communications, Inc..
  12. Macarle, M. T.(2003).Dowling College.
  13. Macarle, M. T.(2003).Dowling College.
  14. Metzler, M.,Young, J. C.(1984).The relationship between teachers preactive planning and student process measures.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,55,356-364.
  15. Morine-Dershimer, G(1978).Planning and classroom reality: An in depth look.Educational Research Quarterly,3(4),83-89.
  16. Morine-Dershimer, G.(1978).Planning and classroom reality: An in depth look.Educational Research Quarterly,3(4),83-89.
  17. Placek, T. H.(1984).A multi-case study of teacher planning in physical education.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,4,39-49.
  18. Wall, J.,Murray, N.(1994).Children and movement: Physical education in the elementary school.Wm. C. Brown Communications, Inc.
  19. 吳偉光(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立台灣師範大學體育研究所。
  20. 吳瑋光(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立台灣師範大學體育研究所。
  21. 林建宏(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
  22. 林富添(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
  23. 林進材(1997)。教師教學思考一理論、研究與應用。高雄市:復文出版社。
  24. 林進材(1997)。教師教學思考-理論、研究與應用。高雄市:復文出版社。
  25. 林寶山(1990)。教學原理。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
  26. 潘義祥(1998)。國小教師體育教學目標之認同構面及目標認同重要性之研究。大專院校87無度體育學術研討會專刊(上)
  27. 顧毓群(1987)。興趣選項分組教學的學生對體育目標之認同傾向。教育學院學報,12,259-293。
  28. 顧毓群(1987)。興趣選項分組教學的學生對體育目標之認同傾向。教育學院學報,12,259-293。
Times Cited
  1. 張騰介(2007)。臺北縣板橋市公立高中師生體育目標認同傾向之研究。臺灣師範大學體育學系學位論文。2007。1-139。