Title

台北都會區不同住宅類型價差之研究

Translated Titles

The Relationship between Floor Area and Unit Price Across Different Residential Types in Taipei Metropolitan Area

DOI

10.6677/JTLR.200605_9(1).0003

Authors

李泓見(Hung-Jian Lee);張金鶚(Chin-Oh Chang);花敬群(Ching-Chun Hua)

Key Words

住宅類型 ; 典型住宅 ; 面積 ; 單價 ; Residential Types ; Typical Houses ; Floor Area ; Unit Price

PublicationName

臺灣土地研究

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

9卷1期(2006 / 05 / 01)

Page #

63 - 87

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

從過去研究房價的文獻中發現,影響房價主要除了地理空間、面積、樓層外,住宅類型也是相當關鍵的一項因素,而過去文獻對此因素欠缺深入討論,因此本文從台北都會區常見住宅類型-透天、套房與電梯大廈的角度出發,探討住宅類型對於單價的影響,另外從個別住宅類型下探討面積與住宅單價的關係。 本文在控制各項住宅特徵後,從住宅供需、典型住宅、非線性價格策略的角度觀察住宅類型影響單價的程度,另一方面,從不同住宅類型下檢測面積與單價關係為何?藉由台北都會區新推個案資料,實證研究結果發現:(1)在住宅品質控制下,套房每坪單價高於透天住宅6.76%,更高於電梯大廈10.72%,而透天住宅每坪單價高於電梯大廈3.7%。(2)在不同住宅類型中,透天與電梯大廈住宅其面積顯著影響房價,且呈現邊際價格遞增的數量溢價現象。

English Abstract

Past studies reveal the main factors that affect residential housing prices are location, floor area, and residential type. However, this is a lack of empirical evidence for the influence of floor area of different residential types on housing prices. Some researches had explored whether or not there exists a convex or a concave relationship between land lot size and its price due to economies of scale, typical houses, and nonlinear pricing behavior. This paper explores the relationship between floor area and unit price for different residential types, including single house, condominium, and studio, using regression analysis. Our empirical results show that housing price of a studio is 10.72 percent higher than that of a condominium and 6.76 percent higher than that of a single house for per ping (3.3m^2) increase in floor area. The unit price of a single house is 3.7 percent higher than that of a condominium. The interpretation of this phenomenon may contribute to economies of scale and nonlinear pricing behavior.

Topic Category 基礎與應用科學 > 永續發展研究
Reference
  1. 林秋瑾、楊宗憲、張金鶚(1996)。住宅價格指數之研究-以台北市為例。住宅學報,4,1-30。
    連結:
  2. 花敬群、張金鶚(1999)。住宅空间次市場價格比例與市場規模之關係。都市與計劃,26,79-94。
    連結:
  3. 張金鶚、范垂爐(1992)。房地產真實交易價格之研究。住宅學報,1,75-97。
    連結:
  4. 張麗姬(1994)。從遠期契約何現貨的角度論預售屋和成屋的價格關係-以台北市為例。住宅學報,2,67-85。
    連結:
  5. 陳彥仲(1997)。住宅選擇之程序性決策模式。住宅學報,5,37-49。
    連結:
  6. Allen, M. T.,T. M. Springer,N. G. Wailer(1995).Implicit Pricing Across Residential Rental Submarkets.Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,11,137-151.
  7. Asabere, P. K.,P. F. Colwell(1985).The Relative lot Size Hypothesis: An Empirical Note.Journal of Urban Studies,22,355-357.
  8. Bourassa, S. C.,M. Hoesli,V. S. Peng(2003).Do housing submarket really matter?.Journal of Housing Economics,12,12-28.
  9. Chau, K. W.,F. F. Ng,Eastman C.,T. Hung(2001).Developer's Good Will as Significant influence on Apartment Unit Prices.The Appraisal Journal,69(1),26-30.
  10. Colwell, P. F.,C. F. Sirmans(1978).Area, Time, Centrality and the Value of Urban Land.Land Economics,54(4),514-519.
  11. Fletcher, M.,P. Gallimore,J. Mangan(2000).The Modelling of Housing Submarkets.Journal of Property investment & Finance,18(4),473-487.
  12. Ford, D. A.(1994).Fundamentals of Real Estate Investment for Decision Makers.St.-Paul:West publishing company.
  13. Goodman, A. C.,J. L. Goodman, JR(1997).The Co-op Discount.Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,14,223-233.
  14. Haurin, D.(1988).The Duration of Marketing Time of Residential Housing.AREUEA Journal,16(4),396-410.
  15. Lin, Tzu-Chin,A. W. Evans(2000).The Relationship Between the Price of Land and Size of Plot When Plots Are Small.Land Economics,76(3),386-394.
  16. Miller, N. G.(1982).Residential property Hedonic pricing models: A Review.Research in Real Estate,12,31-56.
  17. Nelson, T. R.,J. Rabianski(1988).Consumer Preference in Housing Market Analysis: An Application Multidimentional Scaling Techniques.AREUEA Journal,16(2),138-159.
  18. Rosen, S.(1974).Hedonic price and implicit market: product differentiation in pure competition.Journal of Political Economy,32,34-55.
  19. Sirmans, G. S.,Macpherson, D. A.,Zietz, E. N.(2005).The composition of hedonic pricing models.Journal of real eatate literature,13(1),3-43.
  20. Tabuchi, T.(1996).Quantity Premia in Real Property Markets.Land Economics,72(2),206-217.
  21. Wilson, R.(1993).Nonlinear pricing.Newyork:Oxford University Press.
  22. 國泰房地產指數季報
  23. 張金鶚(2003)。華泰書局。台北:
  24. 陳彥仲、林國民(1998)。台灣都市住宅屬性隱含需求分析-以高雄市為例。成功大學學報(人文•社會篇),33,303-320。
Times Cited
  1. 甯方璽、黃雅祺、李文傑(2014)。集合式住宅房價泡沫形成之研究-以台中市為例。建築與規劃學報,15(2/3),155-174。
  2. 董呈煌、陳俊麟、李春長、吳韻玲(2016)。SVR與OLS在住宅價格預測正確率的比較。住宅學報,25(2),31-51。
  3. 蕭雅羚、張曉楨、施光訓(2013)。都會區預售屋訂價策略之研究―財務投資分析觀點。台灣管理學刊,13(1),121-139。
  4. 蘇倖慧、楊宗憲(2011)。迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究。住宅學報,20(2),61-80。
  5. 袁淑湄(2017)。誰是住宅新推個案市場中的黑羊?—台北市和新北市住宅新推個案房價指數分析。住宅學報,26(2),1-25。
  6. 許淑媛、張金鶚、袁淑湄(2011)。住宅個案價格分散之研究:房價水準、景氣時機與區位條件之分析。都市與計劃,38(4),403-426。
  7. 謝富順、張巧宜(2010)。臺灣法拍屋之拍定價格與面積關係之探究。住宅學報,19(2),29-58。
  8. (2008)。現行土地增值稅與量能課說原則之探討。財稅研究,40(2),157-168。
  9. (2019)。臺北市房價變動關鍵因素之實證分析。臺灣銀行季刊,70(4),72-93。