透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.216.114.23
  • 期刊

“幼兒創造力測驗”之發展

The Development of "the Preschoolers' Creativity Test"

摘要


本研究的主要目的為發展「幼兒創造力測驗」,並建立四歲至六歲幼兒的分數常模。本研究以12所幼稚園的467名幼兒為樣本。研究中所使用的「幼兒創造力測驗」包含數字聯想及情境問題解決二分測驗;數字聯想的評分指標為新奇性,情境評量的評分指標為有用性。 研究發現,「幼兒創造力測驗」具有良好的再測信度與評分者信度。本研究以 年齡、氣質、情緒調節、創作性戲劇教學以及多元智慧的統整層分數作為效標,發現這些變項與「幼兒創造力測驗」的總分均有顯著相關,顯示「幼兒創造力測驗」具有良好的效標關聯效度。此外,男女幼兒在創造力總分的表現上均沒有差異;但年齡愈大的幼兒,其創造力的表現愈好。總之,本研究所發展的「幼兒創造力測驗」符合目前創造力評量的共識與趨勢,且能突破幼兒創造力測驗的傳統,同時測量「新奇性」與「有用性」,是一份具有良好信度與效度的幼兒創造力測驗。

關鍵字

幼兒 創造力 測驗 常模

並列摘要


The purposes of this study were to develop The Preschoolers' Creativity Test as well as to establish its scoring norm for 4-to 6-year-old children. Four hundred and sixty-seven children sampled from 12 kindergartens participated in this study. The main instrument employed was The Preschoolers' Creativity Test; it included 2 subtests: Number Association and Situation-based Problem Solving. The abilities evaluated by these two subtests were novelty and usefulness. The findings in this study suggest that The Preschoolers' Creativity Test has good test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability. Moreover, we found that there were significant correlations between age, temperament, emotion regulation, creative drama instruction, the integrated level of multiple intelligences and creativity, suggesting that The Preschoolers' Creativity Test has good criterion-related validity. We also found that the girls and the boys did not perform differently in creativity; however, their performance in creativity improved as their ages increased. To sum up, the creativity test developed in this study matches the consensus and the trend of the evaluation of creativity; it goes beyond the traditional conception of evaluating young children's creativity by including the evaluation of novelty and usefulness. Therefore, The Preschoolers' Creativity Test is a preschoolers' creativity test with decent reliability and validity.

並列關鍵字

Preschooler creativity test norm

參考文獻


葉玉珠(2000)。「創造力發展的生態系統模式」及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析。教育心理學報。32(1),95-122。
Amabile, T. M.(1983).The Psychology of Creativity.New York:Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M.(1996).Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M.,Conti, R.,Lazenby, J.,Herron, M.(1996).Assessing the work environment for creativity.Academy of Management Journal.39,1154-1184.
Arasteh, A. R.,Arasteh, J. D.(1976).Creativity in Human Development.New York:Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc.

被引用紀錄


朱俊龍(2008)。創造性問題解決教學對國小學童創造力 及問題解決能力影響之研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200800360
古一婷(2015)。探究舞蹈編創教學策略--以國立臺北藝術大學舞蹈學院為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北藝術大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6835/TNUA.2015.00073
姚湘玲(2011)。混成式創意教學之個案研究─以高職美容科為例〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2011.00103
賴慕回(2009)。「電機電子技術創造力」量表發展之研究─以臺北市高職學校電機電子群學生為對象〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315170899
謝宗翰(2009)。單元觀念式創意問題解決策略課程之成效研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315153135

延伸閱讀