透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.16.70.101
  • 期刊

成本法估價偏誤之探討-分量迴歸應用

Appraisal Bias of the Cost Approach-A Quantile Regression Analysis

摘要


本文以2007年及2008年北部地區974筆交易案例,由估價人員逐筆以成本法估計之成本價格,與成交價格比較其差異。發現成本價格經統計檢定分析,皆顯著高於實際成交價格。推論成本價格有相對較高之系統性偏誤現象,與以往文獻認為成本價格可作為估計值上限之論述相同。此外,屋齡老舊的確會使估價偏誤提高;惟不同分量點之效果不同。本文實證影響成本法偏誤之變數,發現單位地價愈低、總樓層數愈高、移轉樓層愈低、建物面積愈小、建築工期愈長及利潤率愈小者;偏誤愈小。結構、房屋類型、分區、區域之不同對偏誤亦有影響。經由分量迴歸分析,高低偏誤之影響因素亦存在差異。營造施工費求取方式方面,應用工程造價比較法較單位面積比較法偏誤小。

關鍵字

成本法 估價偏誤 折舊

並列摘要


This paper compares the sale price and cost value, as appraised by valuers applying the cost approach for a sample of 974 transactions for properties sold in 2007 and 2008 in Northern Taiwan. We discovered that the sale price is on average lower than the cost value. The reliability of the cost approach was comparatively questionable due to the systematic bias of the overestimation. The previous literature claimed that cost value could serve as the upper limit for value conclusion and that the cost approach was unreliable. Moreover, the bias associated with cost value increased as buildings aged and this bias differed for different quantiles. This paper demonstrated the bias influencing variables based on the cost approach. We found that the bias will be smaller when the land unit value is smaller, the building is higher, the story is lower, the area is smaller, the period of construction of the property is longer and the profit rate is smaller. The bias was affected by structure, building type, zoning, and region. There were differences between the high and low bias on some factors in regard to the quantile regression. The bias was greater based on the construction items comparison method compared to the unit square method when estimating the construction fees for properties.

並列關鍵字

cost approach appraisal bias depreciation

參考文獻


張金鶚、陳明吉、鄧筱蓉、楊智元(2009)。台北市房價泡沫知多少?—房價vs.租金、房價vs.所得。住宅學報。18(2),1-22。
林秋瑾,楊宗憲,張金鶚 C. O., C. O.(1996).住宅價格指數之研究—以台北市為例.住宅學報.4,1-30.
張麗姬(1994)。從遠期契約和現貨的角度論預售屋和成屋的價格關係—以台北市為例。住宅學報。2,67-85。
張怡文、江穎慧、張金鶚(2009)。分量迴歸在大量估價模型之應用—非典型住宅估價之改進。都市與計劃。16(2),23-42。
Geltner, D. 1998 “Appraisal Smoothing: The Other Side of the Story-A Comment,”SSRN Working Paper 131459, Social Science Research Network.

被引用紀錄


陳懿(2016)。都市河流景觀效益與淹水潛勢之損失評估--空間分量特徵價格法結合地理資訊系統之應用〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201602670
李昌鴻(2015)。影響台灣農業收入之因素及政策意涵〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.00346
孫珮齊(2015)。住宅價格分量對其特徵係數變動之研究─以臺中市透天市場為例〔碩士論文,逢甲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.M0205372
李嘉峯(2011)。從銀行業角度探討反向抵押貸款在臺灣實行之可行性研究〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-1903201314413138
邱雅真(2013)。共同基金銷售之客戶貢獻度探討〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0602201312512600

延伸閱讀