Title

台灣的道德先鋒:焦慮、產檢選擇與責任的矛盾

Translated Titles

Taiwanese Moral Pioneers: The Paradox of Choice, Anxiety and Responsibility

Authors

施麗雯(Li-Wen Shih)

Key Words

道德先鋒 ; 產前篩檢與檢測 ; 優生 ; 本體編舞 ; moral pioneers ; prenatal screening and testing ; you sheng ; anxiety ; responsibility ; ontological choreography

PublicationName

科技醫療與社會

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

21期(2015 / 10 / 01)

Page #

77 - 134

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

台灣於1995年全民健保實施後,估計約有97.2%的懷孕女性接受產前檢查。然而台灣的女性是如何經驗產前篩檢與檢測(產檢)?以及這些經驗對女性的影響是什麼?美國女性主義學者Rayna Rapp指出,在產檢科技與醫療運作下, 當代的女性被迫成為社會的「道德 先鋒」(moral pioneers),決定什麼樣的小孩可以進入我們的社會,對自己未岀世的孩童作價值判斷。在不同的社會脈落下,台灣的懷孕女性是如何經歷「台灣道德先鋒」的角色,此為本文的關懷。本研究於2008年、2009年與2012年間進行田野調查,在三家婦產醫療院所進行參與式觀察和訪談,並從訪談中收集到33張關於「什麼是產檢」的手繪圖。本文分析在產檢的醫療化與常規化下,女性如何被建構為篩檢胎兒健康的決定權主體:承擔著面對產檢對胎兒健康的篩檢結果、以及整體社會的優生意識凝視。透過受訪者所作的選擇以及背後的道德詮釋,提供我們去認識台灣女性在懷孕生物醫療化歷程的焦慮,及其背後的道德與責任的矛盾。本文延伸Charis Thompson的「本體編舞」(ontologicalchoreography)概念,檢視產檢中的不同物質符號行動者的參與以及產檢運作本身如何因應不同行動者的加入或退出而有不同的編舞,以瞭解台灣女性在產檢中所經歷的道德責任的矛盾。

English Abstract

This paper aims to explore women's experience of prenatal screening and testing (PST), and also how these experiences affect women's pregnancy and decision-making. According to an official survey, 97.21% of Taiwanese pregnant women underwent PST in 2008 (Department of Health, Executive Yuan, 2009: 49). From conducting ethnographic observations, interviews with pregnant women and couples, and collecting participants' drawings about what PST is, I found that my participants experienced much anxiety during their pregnancy. I explain this in the context of routine medical practices that construct women as responsible decision‐making subjects, which thus stirs their anxiety by invoking the spectre of a disabled child or of aborting a desired child. As American feminist Rayna Rapp suggests, this positions women as 'moral pioneers' who stand at the moral frontier of our society to decide what kind of children can enter society. Following Rapp's 'moral pioneer,' I use the term 'Taiwanese moral pioneer' to suggest that in Taiwan women's decision-makingare entangled with health care policy, the concept of you sheng (superior birth), medical practices, medical professionals, and these women's families. I see these as material-semiotic actors participating in an "ontological choreography", which is a term coined by Charis Thompson and describes the heterogeneous practices within medical practices. To examine these choreographic enactments, this paper provides accounts of how PST is practiced, and also of its ontological enacting. In the end, the paper contributes to our understanding of the complexity of PST and also its paradox, which is enfolded within Taiwanese women’s anxiety, responsibility and decision-making together.

Topic Category 人文學 > 人文學綜合
醫藥衛生 > 醫藥衛生綜合
醫藥衛生 > 醫藥總論
醫藥衛生 > 基礎醫學
醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
Reference
  1. 吳嘉苓(2011)。編排風險:多胚胎孕育的多重社會技術網絡。台灣社會學,22,111-156。
    連結:
  2. 陳東升(2006)。審議民主的限制:台灣公民會議的經驗。臺灣民主季刊,3(1),77-104。
    連結:
  3. NHS (2015). Screening for Down's, Edwards' and Patau's syndromes. http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/pregnancy-andbaby/pages/screening-amniocentesis-downs-syndrome.aspx#close ( 檢索日期:2015 年02 月22 日)
  4. 台北市政府衛生局(2015),〈台北市政府的助你好孕(孕婦唐氏症篩檢須知)〉。http://www.health.gov.tw/Default.aspx?tabid=626(檢索日期:2015 年2 月17 日)
  5. 國家發展委員會檔案管理局(2014),〈更迭變化的人口課題:永遠的挑戰─推行臺灣地區家庭計畫〉http://www.archives.gov.tw/Publish.aspx?cnid=802&p=412(檢索日期:2014 年10 月28 日)
  6. 產前篩檢與檢測公民會議(2005),〈產前篩檢與檢測公民會議結論報告〉。www.tsd.social.ntu.edu.tw(檢索日期:2005 年12 月10 日)
  7. Discovery Channel (2003). DNA: Global Public Opinion Investigation. April 1.
  8. 范文欽(2009),〈產檢OK 生兒缺腕 告醫敗訴、父母灑淚〉。TVBS:2009 年2 月27 日
  9. 行政院衛生署國民健康局( 2009 ) , 〈社會指標統計年報〉。http://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Attachment/ 08191882771.doc ( 檢索日期:2011 年1 月1 日)
  10. Buikema, Rosemarie(ed.),Griffin, Gabriele(ed.),Lykke, Nina(ed.)(2011).Theories and Methodologies in Postgraduate Feminist Research: researching differently.London:Routledge.
  11. Chiang, H-H,(Yu) Chao, Y-M,Yuh, Y-S(2006).Informed Choice of Pregnant Women in Prenatal Screening Tests for Down's Syndrome.Journal of Medical Ethics,32,273-277.
  12. Chung、 Yueh-Tsen(2002).Struggle for National Survival: Eugenics in Sino-Japanese Contexts, 1896-1945.New York:Routledge.
  13. Cussins, Charis(1996).Ontological Choreography: Agency through Objectification in Infertility Clinics.Social Studies of Science,26(3),575-610.
  14. Davis-Floyd, Robbie(ed.),Dumit, Joseph(ed.)(1998).Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots.New York:Routledge.
  15. Denzin, Norman K.(ed.),Lincoln, Yvonna S.(ed.)(2011).The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research.London:Sage Publications Inc..
  16. Duden, Barbara,Hoinacki, Lee(trans.)(1993).Disembodying Women: Perspectives on Pregnancy and the Unborn.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
  17. Franklin, Sarah(1997).Embodied Progress: a Cultural Account of Assisted Conception.London:Routledge.
  18. Franklin, Sarah,Roberts, Celia(2006).Born and Made: An Ethnography of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  19. Gammeltoft, Tine(2014).Haunting Images: A Cultural Account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  20. Guillemin, Marilys(2004).Understanding Illness: Using Drawings as a Research Method.Qualitative Health Research,14,272-280.
  21. Hyunjoo, Jung(2014).Let Their Voices Be Seen: Exploring Mental Mapping as a Feminist Visual Methodology for the Study of Migrant Women.International Journal of Urban Regional Research,38(3),985-1002.
  22. Jou, Hei-Jen,Kuo, Yih-Shing,Hsu, Jen-Jeih,Shyu, Ming-Kwang,Hsieh, Tsang-Tang,Hsieh, Fon-Jou(2005).The Evolving National Birth Prevalence of Down Syndrome in Taiwan. A Study on the Impact of Second-trimester Maternal Serum Screening.Prenat Diagn,25,665-670.
  23. Kelly, Susan(2009).Choosing not to Choose: Reproductive Responses of Parents of Children with Genetic Conditions or Impairments.Sociology of Health and Illness,31(1),81-97.
  24. Lippman, Abby(1991).Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: Constructing Needs and Reinforcing Inequalities.American Journal of Law & Medicine,XVII(1&2),15-50.
  25. Liu, Paul K.C.(2001).Population Policies and Programs in East Asia, East- West Center Occasional Papers (Population and Health Series)Population Policies and Programs in East Asia, East- West Center Occasional Papers (Population and Health Series),未出版
  26. Lupton, Deborah(1994).Medicine as Culture: Illness, Disease and the Body in Western Societies.London:Sage.
  27. Martin, Emily(1994).Flexible Bodies: Tracking Immunity in American Culture from the Days of Polio to the Age of AIDS.Beacon Press.
  28. Mitchell, Lisa Meryn(2001).Baby's First Picture: Ultrasound and the Politics of Fetal Subjects.University of Toronto Press.
  29. Ong, Aihwa(ed.),Collier, Stephen(ed.)(2005).Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems.Oxford:Blackwell.
  30. Rapp, Rayna(2000).Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impacts of Amniocentesis in America.New York:Routledge.
  31. Rose, Nikolas(1999).Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  32. Rothenberg, Karen H.(ed.),Thomson, Elizabeth J.(ed.)(1994).Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology.Columbus:Ohio State University Press.
  33. Sakellari, Evanthia(2014).Greek Adolescents Views of people with Mental Illness Through Drawings: Mental Health Education's Impact.Nursing and Health Sciences,16(3),358-364.
  34. Shih, Li-Wen(2014).Drawing as a Method/ology: Situating and En-acting Up Taiwanese Pregnant Women's Experience of Prenatal Screening and Testing.性別與健康年會
  35. Shih, Li-Wen(2012).Sociology Department, Lancaster University.
  36. Smart, Carol(2009).Shifting horizons: Reflections on Qualitative Methods.Feminist Theory,10(3),1-14.
  37. Thompson, Charis(2005).Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies.London:The MIT press.
  38. Throsby, Karen(2004).When IVF Fails: Feminism, Infertility, and the Negotiation of Normality.Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.
  39. Wieser, Bernhard(ed.),Karner, Sandra(ed.),Berger, Wilhelm(ed.)(2006).Prenatal Testing: Individual Decision or Distributed Action?.München:Profil.
  40. 王思誠編(2000)。台灣婦產科百年史。台北:中華民國婦產科學會出版。
  41. 王瑤華、張炯心(2003)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,國立成功大學護理系(所)。
  42. 何春蕤編(2000)。性/政治與主體形構。台北:麥田。
  43. 吳嘉苓(2008)。台灣的新生殖科技與性別政治,1950-2000。性別、身體與醫療,台北:
  44. 吳嘉苓(2003)。受污名的性別、性別化的污名:從台灣『不孕』男女處境分析污名的性別政治。台灣社會學刊,29,127-179。
  45. 吳嘉苓、成令方(2002)。國科會專題計畫成果報告國科會專題計畫成果報告,國科會。
  46. 林文源編(2014)。科技社會人2。新竹:國立交通大學出版社。
  47. 倪傳芬、王英偉(2001)。「橋」對安寧病患的象徵意義。安寧療護雜誌,6(3),1-15。
  48. 傅祖壇(2004)。,台北:中研院調查研究專題中心。
  49. 傅祖壇(2005)。,台北:中研院調查研究專題中心。
  50. 黃璉華(2005)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
  51. 鄒孟珍(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台南,國立成功大學公共衛生研究所。
  52. 蔣欣欣(2007)。剖析產前遺傳檢測之諮詢與倫理議題。中華心理衛生學刊,39,65-106。
  53. 衛生福利部(2013)。公共衛生年報102 年版。台北:衛生福利部。
  54. 衛生福利部國民健康署(2007)。孕婦健康手冊。台北:衛生福利部國民健康署。
  55. 衛生福利部國民健康署(2014)。孕婦健康手冊。台北:衛生福利部國民健康署。
Times Cited
  1. 傅大為(2016)。短評施麗雯〈臺灣的道德先鋒〉一文。科技、醫療與社會,22,285-291。
  2. 吳易澄(2018)。臨床文化能力的渴望:再思台灣產後憂鬱。本土心理學研究,49,331-367。
  3. 施麗雯(2019)。孕產照護邏輯:台灣女性的新生育選擇與共同修補。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,44,1-46。