Title

析論組織俗民誌的意義、概念、方法與實例

Translated Titles

Institutional Ethnography: Meanings, Concepts, Methods, and Instances

DOI

10.6255/JWGS.2005.20.223

Authors

楊正誠(Cheng-Cheng Yang)

Key Words

Dorothy E smith ; 女性主義社會學 ; 組織俗民誌 ; Dorothy E. Smith ; feminist sociology ; institutional ethnography

PublicationName

女學學誌:婦女與性別研究

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

20期(2005 / 12 / 01)

Page #

223 - 254

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

組織俗民誌是加拿大女性社會學家Dorothy E smith所發展的一種研究方法,試圖從個人的每日生活世界與經驗出發,分析、理解並說明人類世界中的社會現象,廣受社會科學界的認可與運用,有其重要性。因此,本文首先介紹smith女性主義社會學的意義與貢獻;其次,針對組織俗民誌的意義、概念與方法進行介紹;最後,以Mothering for schooling(母職與學校教育)一書,作為分析組織俗民誌的研究實例。

English Abstract

The concept of institutional ethnography was developed by Dorothy E. Smith, a well-known feminist sociologist, who established that institutional ethnographic inquiry begins from a personal everyday experience and attempts to analyze, understand, and explain social phenomena in the everyday world. As an important research method, institutional ethnography has become widely applied and recognized in different spheres of social science. The goals of this paper are threefold. The first is to discuss the meanings and contributions of feminist sociological perspectives introduced by Smith. Second, we specifically aim to illustrate the meanings, concepts, and methods of institutional ethnography. Finally, searching for instances of institutional ethnography, we examine Griffith and Smith's study Mothering Jar schooling.

Topic Category 社會科學 > 社會學
社會科學 > 社會學
Reference
  1. Baktm, M. M.(1986).Speech genres and other late essays.TX:University of Texas Press.
  2. Brewer, J. D.(2000).Ethnography.Buckingham:Open University Press.
  3. Campbell, M.(1998).Institutional ethnography and experience as data.Qualitative sociology,21(1),55-73.
  4. Campbell, M.,Gregor, F.(2004).Mapping social relations: A primer in doing institutional ethnography.New York:AltaMira Press.
  5. Collins, P. H.(1992).Transforming the inner circle: Dorothy Smith's challenge to sociological theory.Sociological theory,10(1),73-80.
  6. De Vault, M.,McCoy, L.(2002).Handbook of interview research: Context and method.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
  7. Foucault, M.(1984).Power I knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977.New York:Pantheon Books.
  8. Foucault, M.(1972).The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language.New York:Pantheon Books.
  9. Foucault, M.(1981).Untying the text: A poststructuralist reader.London:Routledge.
  10. Griffith, A. I.,Smith, D. E.(2005).Mothering for schooling.London and New York:Falmer.
  11. Laslett, B.,Thorne, B.(1992).Considering Dorothy Smith's social theory: Introduction.Sociological theory,10(1),60-62.
  12. Marcus, G. E.,Fischer, M. M. J.(1986).Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  13. Mykhalovskiy, E.,McCoy, L.(2002).Troubling ruling discourses of health: Using institutional ethnography in community-based research.Critical public health,12(1),17-37.
  14. Smith, D. E.(1990).Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling.New York:Routledge.
  15. Smith, D. E.(1990).The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge.Boston:Northeastern University Press.
  16. Smith, D. E.(1987).The everyday world as problematic.Boston:Northeastern University Press.
  17. Smith, D. E.(1999).Writing the social: Critique, theory and investigations.Toronto:University of Toronto Press.
  18. Smith, D. E.(2002).Qualitative research in action.London:Sage.
Times Cited
  1. 葉琇姍(2016)。「做個就業好公民」的身心障礙者就業促進論述-以建制民族誌觀點分析。臺灣大學社會工作學研究所學位論文。2016。1-354。 
  2. 陳怡伶(2011)。精神復健機構的評鑑制度與專業實踐:建制民族誌之分析。臺灣師範大學復健諮商研究所學位論文。2011。1-181。
  3. 陳俞余(2013)。行政的追隨者,還是教師的領頭羊—學年主任工作經驗之建制民族誌研究。中正大學教育學研究所學位論文。2013。1-246。