「RIP，426」：解析「大陸地區旅台學位生」的國族經驗

＂RIP, 426＂: Analyzing ＂National Experiences＂ of the Degree-Pursuing Mainland Students in Taiwan

汪宏倫(Horng-Luen Wang) ； 張可(Ke Zhang)

《政治與社會哲學評論》 65期 (2018/06) Pp. 1-88

https://doi.org/10.6523/SOCIETAS.201806_(65).001

摘要

2011年，台灣正式開放「大陸地區學生」（簡稱「陸生」）來台求取高等教育學位，為兩岸交流注入新元素。許多政府高層與民間支持者都樂觀認為，開放陸生來台可增進兩岸年輕世代的相互理解，甚至可以培養未來大陸的「親台派」，有助於和緩兩岸關係、促進兩岸和平。本研究透過深度訪談、參與觀察等方式，從制度、認識框架與情感結構三個層次來解析陸生來台之後在「國族問題」上所感受的經驗，發現陸生的國族經驗產生「推力」與「拉力」，分化出三種不同類型的陸生，其中兩類對台灣的反感或敵意增加，對中共現行體制的認同度則上升。這樣的結果，與原先開放陸生來台的政策預期似乎有所牴觸。本文最後則根據上述分析，提出本研究對和平與和解的啟示。

關鍵字

陸生 ； 凡常民族主義 ； 日常生活 ； 兩岸關係 ； 現象學的社會學

並列摘要

In 2011, the Taiwanese government launched a new policy to open opportunities for students from mainland China (also known as ＂lusheng＂) to pursue higher education degrees in Taiwan. Many high officials and supporters optimistically expected that such a policy would advance mutual understandings between the younger generations across the Strait; some may even have thought that this policy would foster ＂Taiwan-friendly circles＂ that, in turn, would contribute to peace-building by reducing tensions across the Strait. Using data collected from in-depth interviews and participatory observations, this paper investigates mainland students' experiences regarding the ＂national question＂ through three levels: institutions, cognitive frames, and structures of feeling. It is found that ＂national experiences＂ of mainland students generate both ＂pushes＂ and ＂pulls＂ that further differentiate three types of students. Among them, two types of students have become more hostile to Taiwan and more supportive to the communist regime in China. Such a result seems to contradict the initial policy expectation. In conclusion, we explore the implications from this analysis for future reconciliation between the two sides across the Strait.

並列關鍵字

lusheng (students from mainland China) ； banal nationalism ； everyday life ； cross-strait relations ； phenomenological sociology

參考文獻

吳介民，2009，〈中國因素與台灣民主〉，《思想》，11 期，頁141-157。

王嘉州，2012，〈來臺陸生統一態度變遷初探─政治社會化途徑與定群追蹤法之分析〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，9 卷3 期，頁85-118。

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2006. The Civil Sphere. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.

Bonikowski, Bart. 2016. “Nationalism in Settled Times,” Annual Review of Sociology 42(1): 427-449.