相對於其他國家,臺灣政府人事管理的最大特色是高度依賴法律和法規命令進行。本文借用管制影響評估理論和機制,以及策略性人力資源管理理論,建構分析人事管理法令管制品質的三個觀點:合目的性、合效能性和合憲性,分別對應著公共行政領域分析的管理、政治和法律觀點。根據該架構,本文逐項分析臺灣現行人事管理法律的管制品質,結果顯示整體性和個別性的人事法律管制品質均不佳,一則忽略對增進政府競爭力和經營服務績效等核心公共價值的重視,二則主要人事管理領域內的核心管理措施並未和其政策目標間有密切連結,三則相對缺乏以保障公共利益模式為思考主體的合憲性思考。
Quite different from OECD counties, public personnel management relies upon the regulatory approach mainly established by laws in Taiwan. This paper proposes three lens for analyzing the regulatory quality of personnel laws-effectiveness, instrumentality and constitutionality which combines arguments taking from both regulatory impact analysis and strategic human resource management. Results show that the regulatory quality is not good enough for public personnel polices. Public personnel laws currently in force have not set up clear strategic goals for enhancing government competitiveness and performance. Nor do those key measures of any functional personnel management law match its policy goal well. Lastly, the public service model is often not applied to design personnel management laws for maintaining their constitutionality.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。