Title

YouTube華語教學背後的奧妙:解析開放式網路教學之教師實務理論化與身份認同建構

Translated Titles

Behind the Closed Door of Chinese Teaching on YouTube: A Study on Theorizing OER Practice and Constructing Teacher Identities

Authors

招靜琪(Chin-Chi CHAO);方瑾(Jin FANG)

Key Words

二語教師身分認同 ; 二語敘事研究 ; 在YouTube上的華語教學 ; 後教學法 ; Chinese teaching on YouTube ; narrative inquiry ; post method pedagogy ; second language teacher identities

PublicationName

華語文教學研究

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

17卷4期(2020 / 12 / 01)

Page #

117 - 137

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

YouTube是全球觀眾日常學習的工具,此「小型開放式教育資源」(Little OER, Weller 2010)不同於一般課室或遠距教學,華語老師如何自處並面對挑戰?本研究採敘事研究方法,聚焦於資深華語教師省思YouTube華語教學團隊日常運作三年之親身經驗敘事。以解構、詮釋、重構為分析方法,並以庫瑪的三維語言教學系統(Kumaravadivelu 2003)為架構,結合Wenger(1998)的實務社群概念,萃取出教師如何在華語教學與YouTube兩實務社群間磨合,將YouTube教學實務理論化。結果提出三項主張,包含不同實務社群經驗的串連與糾結、教學設計核心、突破有限「教師」視角的條件。文後討論此另類的教學經驗對實務、研究的啟示,包括華語師資教育面對新媒體的建議。

English Abstract

Teaching Chinese through YouTube videos, or the so-called Little Open Educational Resources (Weller 2010), is not like teaching in conventional classrooms. How did an experienced teacher meet the challenge in such a digital Chinese teaching context? This study adopted narrative inquiry methods to capture a teacher's three-year experience working side-by-side with Chinese teaching YouTubers. Drawing on Wenger (1998) and Kumaravadivelu (2003), the study deconstructed, interpreted, and reconstructed the narrative data in order to derive assertions as to how the teacher negotiated a satisfying identity and constructed personal theory from practice. Three assertions are proposed, including the complicated connection between two communities (Chinese teaching and YouTube), the core instructional practice, and ways to expand the teacher self in this context. Implications and suggestions for research and practice are discussed, including how Chinese teacher education could meet the challenge of alternative practice in digital contexts.

Topic Category 人文學 > 語言學
社會科學 > 教育學
Reference
  1. Huang, Yi-ping(ed.)(2017).Constructing identity in language education in Taiwan.Taiwan Journal of TESOL,14(2),1-35.
    連結:
  2. 李海碩, Hai-shuo,周倩, Chien(2013)。台灣開放式課程發展歷程、特色、與影響之初探:以交通大學開放式課程為例。大學圖書館,17(1),22-42。
    連結:
  3. 陳亮均, Liang-chun,岑世寬, Shih-kuan,李建邦, Chien-pang(2019)。探討 YouTuber 風格類型與其因素相關性影響之研究-以青少年為例。管理資訊計算,8(1),156-166。
    連結:
  4. Barkhuizen, Gary(2017).Reflections on Language Teacher Identity Research.New York:Routledge.
  5. Barkhuizen, Gary(ed.)(2014).Narrative Research in Applied Linguistics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  6. Barkhuizen, Gary(ed.)(2011).Narrative research in TESOL.TESOL Quarterly, Special-topic Issue,45(3),391-590.
  7. Barkhuizen, Gary,Benson, Phil,Chik, Alice(2014).Narrative Inquiry in Language Teaching and Learning Research.New York:Routledge.
  8. Camilleri, Anthony F.,Ehlers, Ulf Daniel,Pawlowski, Jan(2014).,Luxembourg:Publications Office of the European Union.
  9. De Costa, Peter(ed.),Norton, Bonny(ed.)(2017).Transdisciplinarity and language teacher identity.The Modern Language Journal,101,1-105.
  10. De Fina, Anna(ed.),Perrino, Sabina(ed.)(2011).Narratives in interviews, interviews in narrative studies.Language in Society, Special-topic Issue,40(1),1-11.
  11. Kumaravadivelu, Bala(2003).Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching.New York:Yale University Press.
  12. Kumaravadivelu, Bala(1994).The postmethod condition: (E) merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching.TESOL Quarterly,28(1),27-48.
  13. Kumaravadivelu, Bala(2001).Toward a postmethod pedagogy.TESOL Quarterly,35(4),537-560.
  14. Larsen-Freeman, Diane,Anderson, Marti(2011).Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  15. Norton, Bonny(2013).Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation.Bristol, UK:Multilingual Matters.
  16. Norton, Bonny,De Costa, Peter I.(2019).Research tasks on identity in language learning and teaching.Language Teaching,51(1),90-112.
  17. Pennington, Martha C.,Richards, Jack C.(2016).Teacher identity in language teaching: Integrating personal, contextual, and professional factors.RELC Journal,47(1),5-23.
  18. Prabhu, Nagore S.(1990).There is no best method-Why?.TESOL Quarterly,24(2),161-176.
  19. Sargeant, Joan(2012).Qualitative research part II: Participants, analysis, and quality assurance.Journal of Graduate Medical Education,4(1),1-3.
  20. Stranger- Johannessen, Espen,Norton, Bonny(2017).The African storybook and language teacher identities in digital times.The Modern Language Journal,101(S1 Supplement),45-60.
  21. Tai, James HY(1985).Temporal Sequence and Chinese Word Order.Iconicity in Syntax,Amsterdam:
  22. Varghese, Manka(ed.),Motha, Suhanthie(ed.),Park, Gloria(ed.),Reeves, Jenelle(ed.),Trent, John(ed.)(2016).Special issue: Language teacher identity in (multi)lingual educational contexts.TESOL Quarterly,50(3),545-783.
  23. Varghese, Manka,Morgan, Brian,Johnston, Bill,Johnson, Kimberly A.(2005).Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond.Journal of Language, Identity, and Education,4,21-44.
  24. Weller, Martin(2010).Big and little OER.OpenED2010: Seventh Annual Open Education Conference,Barcelona, Spain:
  25. Wenger, Etienne(1998).Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  26. 王慧蘭, Hui-lan(2005)。批判教育學:權利抗爭、文本政治、和教育實踐。台灣教育社會學研究,5(2),85-112。
  27. 陳志銘, Chih-ming,陳勇汀, Yong-ting,林筱芳, Hsiao-fang(2000)。通識教育開放式課程數位典藏建置之研究。大學圖書館,14(2),83-112。
  28. 創見網。2015。〈一夜暴富還是悄悄退隱:做網紅沒你想的那麼風光〉。2020 年 7 月 12 日取自 http://www.5icool.org/a/201512/a15320_2.html[Chuang-jian-wang. 2015. Get rich overnight or retreat quietly: Being an Internet celebrity is not as beautiful as you think. Accessed online, July 12, 2020. http://www.5icool.org/a/201512/a15320_2.html]
  29. 戴浩一, James H-Y(2007)。中文構詞與句法的概念結構。華語文教學研究,4(1),1-30。
Times Cited
  1. 李昱(2021)。Standard Language Ideologies in an Adult CSL Classroom。臺灣華語教學研究,22,97-121。