透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.232.160
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

Varieties of Semi-Presidentialism and Their Impact on Nascent Democracies

並列摘要


Semi-presidentialism is the situation where the constitution identifies both a directly elected president and a prime minister responsible to the legislature. There are now some sixty countries in the world with a semi-presidential constitution. However, the academic wisdom is resolutely opposed to the adoption of semi-presidentialism and nascent democracies are advised to avoid this form of government. This essay examines the performance of semi-presidentialism. Particular attention is paid to the effect of various forms of semi-presidentialism. Different forms of semi-presidentialism are expected to have different effects. To this end, all the countries with a semi-presidential constitution that have embarked on the process of democratic transition are identified. To what extent was semi-presidentialism a factor in the cases when the transition process was successful? When the transition process failed, to what extent was semi-presidentialism responsible for this failure? What was the effect of different forms of semi-presidentialism on the process of democratization? The findings suggest that there is inconclusive evidence to document some of the major problems commonly associated with semi-presidentialism. The performance of semi-presidentialism seems strongly influenced by noninstitutional factors. However, there is a difference between the performance of the two main types of semi-presidentialism that are identified. Overall, the findings do not provide grounds to recommend for or against the adoption of semi-presidentialism as opposed to parliamentarism or presidentialism, but if constitution-makers decide to adopt a semi-presidential constitution, then the findings suggest that they should adopt a premier-presidential form of semi-presidentialism.

並列關鍵字

無資料

參考文獻


Henisz Political Constraint Index (POLCON)
Adam Przeworski,Michael E. Alvarez,José Antonio Cheibub,Fernando Limongi(2000).Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
Angus Maddison(2003).The World Economy: Historical Statistics.Paris:OECD.
Anna Sophia Nyholm Moestrup(2004).Semi-presidentialism in Comparative Perspective: Its Effects on Democratic Survival.George Washington University.
Arend Lijphart(2004).Constitutional Design for Divided Societies.Journal of Democracy.15(2),102.

被引用紀錄


江芸萱(2011)。波蘭半總統制研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2011.00092
梁玉玲(2006)。阿根廷梅南主義之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2006.00421
Bekhoven, J. V. (2018). 解開台灣與巴拉圭原住民的雙重壓迫: 以原住民的土地權和自治權為中心 [doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201800117
林秉儀(2017)。首次政黨輪替後臺灣民眾對報紙與電視媒體的信任變遷及原因探索~2001-2014年四波調查的分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703233
官晴(2016)。後列寧半總統制政體的憲政轉型與民主表現 外力、經濟、民族主義激蕩下的變奏: 台灣、俄羅斯、蒙古〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201602641

延伸閱讀