聯合國中的原住民族國際人權

The Generations of Indigenous Human Rights in the United Nations

Awi Mona ； 蔡志偉(Chih-Wei Tsai)

《台灣國際研究季刊》 4卷2期 (2008/06) Pp. 81-108

摘要

回顧過去30多年來的發展，傳統國際人權建構，尤其是在聯合國及其相關機構，已將視野與關懷擴大並深入到原住民族議題，在區域、國家及國際層面上發展強而可靠的原住民族保護架構。2007年聯合國大會通過『聯合國原住民族權利宣言』，此項宣言代表著國際人權系譜拓展的新指標，更是作爲全球深化原住民族權利保障的新基準。當前台灣原住民族自治架構在原住民族基本法等各項法制基礎的建構中已逐漸成形，如何充實自治的內涵，進行國際人權法與國家法間的調適論述和法條化，將是國際原住民族法律權利落實與部落發展的關鍵。因此，本文旨在透過國際原住民族權利之發展、整理，提供台灣原住民族權利論述的激勵，獲致推動原住民族部落自治、重建部落自主管理之目標。

關鍵字

原住民族 ； 聯合國 ； 原住民族權利宣言 ； 國際法 ； 原住民族議題常設論壇

並列摘要

Since the 1970s, there has been a steady normative development of indigenous rights under the international law scheme. Various international human rights instruments have exhibited a renewed and increasingly heightened focus on the concerns of indigenous peoples. This paper aims to offer an insightful point of view on the origin and development of international indigenous rights movements from a realist approach of international law. Pragmatically speaking, this research argues that the accomplishment of indigenous rights rely upon the principles of partnership, consultation and cooperation between indigenous peoples and nation-states.

並列關鍵字

indigenous peoples ； United Nations ； Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples ； international law ； Permanent Forum on the Indigenous Issues

參考文獻

United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues

Alfredsson, Gudmundur.,Christian Tomuschat (ed.)(1993).Modern Law of Self-Determination.Boston:Martinus Nijhoff.

Anaya, S. James.(1990).The Capacity of International Law to Advance Ethnic or Nationality Rights Claims.Iowa Law Review.75(4),837-844.

Anaya, S. James.(2004).Indigenous Peoples in International Law.Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Anaya, S. James,Claudio Grossman.(2002).The Case of Awas Tingni v. Nicaragua: A New Step in the International Law of Indigenous Peoples.Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law.19(1),1-15.