歐洲整合的新葛蘭西學派論述

The Discourse of New Gramscian School on European Integration

李政鴻(Cheng-Hung Lee) ； 余家哲(Hubert Chia-Che Yu)

《台灣國際研究季刊》 5卷2期 (2009/06) Pp. 139-166

摘要

歐洲整合在近20年得到顯著成果，包括單一市場、經濟暨貨幣聯盟及中東歐國家加入歐盟。本文從新葛蘭西學派來探討歐洲整合過程，理解整合的驅動力和特色。新葛蘭西學派主要是檢視物質力量、制度和觀念等三要素間的辯證關係，以理解世界秩序變動的本質。運用到歐洲整合研究，本文以「執委會－歐洲企業家圓桌論壇－鑲嵌新自由主義」爲研究架構，理解這三項要素間的辯證關係如何驅動歐洲整合中的經濟整合與東擴。

關鍵字

歐洲整合 ； 執委會 ； 歐洲企業家圓桌論壇 ； 鑲嵌新自由主義 ； 新葛蘭西學派

並列摘要

European integration had accomplished its distinguishing success in past two decades. In order to explain the EU's development and possible future, integration studies need a theory which can observe and understand its dynamic process. This article analyses European integration's deepening and widening process by using New Gramscian School framework for the sake of understanding integration's driving force and attribute. New Gramscian School understands the world’s order's constant change by analysing the dialectical relationship among material force, institution and idea.
In contrary to European integration studies, this article uses triangle framework of European Commission, European Round Table of Industrialists and Embedded Neo-liberalism to understand the core driving force behind European integration. In sum, this article finds Commission and ERT allied themselves to be transnational historical bloc, who takes embedded neo-liberalism as ideology, legitimized forming European hegemony structure and dominated European integration's deepening and widening.

並列關鍵字

European integration ； European Commission ； ERT ； Embedded Neo-liberalism ； New Gramscian School

參考文獻

黃偉峰(2003)。歐盟政治研究中理論方法之分類與比較。人文及社會科學集刊。15(4)，539-594。

藍玉春(2004)。歐盟尼斯條約評析。問題與研究。43(4)，73-94。

曾怡仁、張惠玲(2000)。區域整合理論與發展。問題與研究。39(8)，53-70。

Bieler, Andreas(2005).European Integration and the Transnational Restructuring of Social Relations: The Emergence of Labor as a Regional Actor?.Journal of Common Market Studies.43(3),461-484.

Bieler, Andreas(eds.),Adam David Morton(eds.)(2001).Social Forces in the Making of the New Europe: The Restructuring of European Social Relations in the Global Political Economy.New York:Palgrave.