Aeronautical Decision-Making Training Mnemonics: Experts and Novices Evaluated Five Alternative Methods

W. C. Li ； F. E. Wu ； T. H. Li

《危機管理學刊》 3卷2期 (2006/09) Pp. 1-8

https://doi.org/10.6459/JCM.200609_3(2).0001

並列摘要

The purposes of this study was to analyze the suitability of ADM mnemonics, from the perspectives of instructor pilots and cadet pilots, as a basis for ADM training across a range of different tactical environments. Sixty instructor pilots and forty-seven cadet pilots in the Republic of China Air Force Academy participated. They assessed the suitability of five different ADM mnemonics (SHOR-Wohl, 1981; PASS -Maher, 1989; FOR-DEC-Hormann, 1995; SOAR-Oldaker, 1995; and DESIDE-Murray, 1997) in the 6 different basic types of decision-making situation described by Orasanu (1993): go/no go decisions; recognition-primed decisions; response selection; resource management decisions; non-diagnostic procedure, and problem-solving. The findings indicated that SHOR was regarded as the most suitable mnemonic for application in time-limited and critical, urgent situations. DESIDE was thought to be superior for knowledge-based decisions which needed more comprehensive consideration but were less time limited.

並列關鍵字

Aeronautical decision-making (ADM) ； Human error ； Situation assessment ； Risk management ； Time pressure

參考文獻

Chi, M.,Glaser, R.,Farr, M. J.(1988).Lawrence Erlbaum.NJ:Hillsdale.

Diehl, A.,Jensen, R. S.(Editor)(1991).The Effectiveness of Training Programs for Preventing Aircrew Error.Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology.2,640-655.

Endsley, M. R. ,Zsambok, C. E.,Klein, G.(Editor)(1997).Naturalistic Decision Making.Lawrence Erlbaum:Mahwah.

Fischer, U.,Orasanu, J.,Wich, M.,Jensen, R. S.,Rakovan, L. A.(Editor)(1995).Expert Pilots' Perceptions of Problem Situations.Eighth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology.2

Hormann, H. J.,Fuller, R.,Johnston, R.,McDonald, N.(Editor)(1995).Human Factors in Aviation Operations.Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot:England.