跆拳道優秀選手與大專生運動視覺之比較

A Comparison Study of Sports Vision between Elite Taekwondo Contestants and University Student Athletes

劉妍秀(Yen-Hsiu Liu) ； 史麗珠(Lai-Chu See) ； 黃千綺(Chang-Chi Huang) ； 朱彥穎(Yan-Ying Ju) ； 張世聰(Shih-Tsung Chang)

《運動教練科學》 25期 (2012/03) Pp. 39-51

https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.2012.25.04

摘要

Purpose: Compare the peripheral awareness (PA), eye movement (EM), momentary vision (MV) and dynamic visual acuity (DVA) of elite Taekwondo contestants and university student athletes. Methods: 15male elite athletic students Taekwondo contestants and university students were recruited, and the improved version of Athlevision of sports vision measurement tool was used. The Mann-Whitney test is used, level of significance is α = .05. Results: PA: Taekwondo contestants group (TCG) (5.29 ± 0.63cm) was relatively better than university students group (USG) (4.73 ± 0.92 cm) (z = -2.189; p = .029). In DVA (up, down, left, and right): TCG was 84.87 ± 21.33 ms, and USG was 87.96 ± 14.53ms. EM: TCG was 13.5 ± 1.60ms, and USG was 14.80 ± 3.61ms. MV: TCG was 27.61 ± 9.66ms, and USG was 24.03 ± 12.15ms. The DVA, EM, and MV were no significant different between two groups (p ＞ .05). Conclusion: The performance of TCG in peripheral awareness was relatively better than USG. The finding may provide Taekwondo coach and researchers understand that the individual difference in the ability and reference to indentify (PA, EM, MV, and DVA) in Taekwondo sports.

關鍵字

運動視覺測量 ； 周邊視覺 ； 動體視力 ； 眼球運動 ； 瞬間視覺

並列摘要

Purpose: Compare the peripheral awareness (PA), eye movement (EM), momentary vision (MV) and dynamic visual acuity (DVA) of elite Taekwondo contestants and university student athletes. Methods: 15male elite athletic students Taekwondo contestants and university students were recruited, and the improved version of Athlevision of sports vision measurement tool was used. The Mann-Whitney test is used, level of significance is α = .05. Results: PA: Taekwondo contestants group (TCG) (5.29 ± 0.63cm) was relatively better than university students group (USG) (4.73 ± 0.92 cm) (z = -2.189; p = .029). In DVA (up, down, left, and right): TCG was 84.87 ± 21.33 ms, and USG was 87.96 ± 14.53ms. EM: TCG was 13.5 ± 1.60ms, and USG was 14.80 ± 3.61ms. MV: TCG was 27.61 ± 9.66ms, and USG was 24.03 ± 12.15ms. The DVA, EM, and MV were no significant different between two groups (p ＞ .05). Conclusion: The performance of TCG in peripheral awareness was relatively better than USG. The finding may provide Taekwondo coach and researchers understand that the individual difference in the ability and reference to indentify (PA, EM, MV, and DVA) in Taekwondo sports.

並列關鍵字

peripheral awareness ； sports vision measurement ； dynamic visual acuity ； eye movement ； momentary vision

參考文獻

劉雅甄、王艾伶、鄭芳梵(2010)。開放式與閉鎖式運動選手動態視力之比較。運動研究。19(1)，131-140。

劉妍秀、林逸錄、黃千綺、朱彥穎、張榮三、史麗珠(2011)。跆拳道選手與大專生深度知覺之比較：絕對及相對辨識的距離誤差。成大體育。43(2)，56-66。

劉妍秀、朱彥穎、史麗珠、黃千綺、張榮三(2010)。運動視覺軟體量測之穩定性應用探討。運動教練科學。17，65-78。

劉雅甄、林添鴻、林昌國(2007)。不同教育階段棒球和空手道運動員動體視力之比較。運動教練科學。8，133-139。

彭譯箴、李雲光(2005)。籃球選手與大專生深度知覺之比較研究。北體學報。13，88-95。