透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.147.104.248
  • 期刊

質的研究的信度和效度

Validity and Reliability of Qualitative Research in Education

摘要


質的研究和量的研究有其差異性和密切關係,有的論者以爲量的研究所追求者,質的研究亦應寄予重視,信度和效度即爲其中之即使使用名稱雖有不同,但是性質亦頗相近。本文根據可信賴性和暸解二項品質,探討質的研究的效度,前者又分成可信性和可遷移性。另就涉及研究的客觀性的可確認性,一併予以分析;進而申述提升質的研究效度的可行策略。至於瞭解的品質則分從描述效度、詮釋效度、學理效度、可概括性、和評鑑效度予以分析。最後析述質的研究信度,以可依賴性爲主軸探索,並據以闡釋可以提升信度效標的各項可行策略。其中,在提升質的研究效度、信度和客觀性的諸項策略中,三角交叉、同儕或參與者評述、外界審核機制,和延長田野工作時間等策略似具有共同性。

關鍵字

質的研究 信度 效度 可信賴性 瞭解 可確認性

並列摘要


The article explored the difference and relationship between qualitative and quantitative research paradigm, using trustworthiness and understanding as criteria, to assess validity of qualitative research and confirmability to confirm objectivity of qualitative research, and dependability of qualitative research to measure reliability. To analyze validity of qualitative research, trustworthiness was classified into topics of credibility and transferability, and understanding was included descriptive, interpretive, theoretical, and evaluative validity and generalization. Then, approaches for enhancing each validity were proposed. The procedure of processing objectivity and reliability is the same as validity. Triangulation, peer briefing, participant review, external audit trail, and prolonged on-site work were more important ways among strategies for enhancing validity, reliability, and objectivity of qualitative research. The nature of enhancing reliability strategies of qualitative research may vary, but the terms, such as intra-rater agreement and intra-rater agreement/inter-observer agreement are similar to those in quantitative research, and the same as strategies of multiple observations, member checking and participant review for validity of qualitative research.

參考文獻


Anfara, V. A., Jr.,Brown, K. M.,Mangione, T. L.(2002).Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public.Educational Research.31(7),28-38.
Ary, D.,Jacobs, C.,Sorensen, C.(2010).Introduction to research in education.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Bogdan , R. C.,Biklen, S. K.(2007).Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
Creswell, J. W.,Clark, V. L. P.(2007).Designing and conducting mixed methods research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Denzin, N. K.(ed.),Lincoln, Y. S.(ed.)(2000).Handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

被引用紀錄


阮銀慈(2017)。國中英文教師專業學習社群推動課堂教學研究之個案研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00012
歐陽仁泓(2023)。從生命歷程觀點看思覺失調症患者手足照顧者之照顧經驗〔碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6837/ncnu202300228
郭皓玉(2023)。飼主面對寵物非預期性死亡的經驗與心理調適歷程之研究〔碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6837/ncnu202300084
莊馨茹(2023)。心理師從事性侵加害人社區治療之經驗探究〔碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6837/ncnu202300065
盧柏樑、楊詠梅(2021)。以深度訪談了解未完成都治療程之結核病患者的疾病感受高雄護理雜誌38(3),1-11。https://doi.org/10.6692/KJN.202112_38(3).0001

延伸閱讀


國際替代計量