By examining discourses regarding Europe in curricular standards and guidelines from 1968 to 2011, this study investigated how Europe, as a type of Other, was delineated and how these discourses reflected subjectivity and a complex dynamism between China and Taiwan and Europe. Based upon Said and Bhabha's critical theories of the Other, this study followed Fairclough's method of critical discourse analysis and identified three approaches to presenting Europe in 10 curricular standards and guidelines over the past 40 years. The three approaches of illustrating Europe feature Said's and Bhabha's notion of the discursive Other produced in the postcolonial condition.