高中職學生問題導向兩性關係與溝通網路學習成效之研究

A Study of the Effectiveness of Problem-based Gender Relationship and Communication by Applying Interactive E-learning to Assist High School and Vocational High School Students

張菀珍(Wan-Jen Chang)；葉榮木(Zong-Mu Yeh)

兩性關係與溝通 ； 問題導向學習 ； 網路學習成效 ； gender relationship and communication ； problem-based learning ； e-learning effectiveness

教育科學研究期刊

54卷4期（2009 / 12 / 01）

85 - 114

繁體中文

依據相關研究發現，「兩性關係與溝通」是高中職學生最迫切需要的學習主題。本研究將應用「問題導向兩性關係與溝通學習網站」及「融入式問題導向兩性關係與溝通實驗教材」，以一所高中和高職共133位學生，分為「實驗組」及「對照組」進行準實驗研究，並採用問卷調查、觀察日誌及焦點團體等方式，蒐集分析量化及質性資料。研究發現：一、問題導向兩性關係與溝通學習實驗，不論在高中和高職均有顯著的學習成效；二、高中學生的問題導向「面對面學習」組優於「網路學習」組的學習成效；三、高職學生的問題導向「網路學習」組優於「面對面學習」組的學習成效；四、未來可增加多元化的討論議題、影音教材，並提供線上心理測驗與個別諮詢，以提升學習成效。

The problems of campus violence such as acquaintanceship in Internet, suicide and sexual harassment occur very often. Related research results showed that infusing the Gender Relationship and Communication into the web-based learning is urgent need for high school and vocational high school students. This study uses ”the e-learning web-side of problem-based Gender Relationship and Communication” and ”involving problem-based Gender Relationship and Communication e-learning teaching materials” to instruct students. The purpose of this study was to explore the learning effect and investigate the influenced problems. A quasi-experimental design was utilized and purposive sampling was conducted at a high school and a vocational high school in Taiwan. One hundred thirty three eleven grade students were assigned into experimental and control group in each school. In this study, quantitative and qualitative research methods were used, and they included Survey, Observation records analyzing and focus group. The findings of this study including: (1) Using problem-based Gender Relationship and Communication e-learning can promote the learning effectiveness of experimental and control groups significantly in both of the school. (2) The problem-based learning effect of face to face learning is significant than e-learning learning in high school. (3) The problem-based learning effect of e-learning learning is significant than face to face learning in vocational high school. (4) The students suggest that diversity topics for discussion, multi-media materials, online psychological test and individual guiding may promote the learning effectiveness.

1. 林甘敏、陳年興(2002)。網路大學學習問題探討。資訊管理研究，4(2)，65-85。
   連結：
2. 高松景、晏涵文、劉潔心(2004)。台北市中小學「兩性平等教育」評量之縱貫性研究。臺灣性學學刊，10(2)，1-17。
   連結：
3. 湯仁燕(2000)。多元文化課程的轉化與教學實踐。教育研究集刊，44，91-115。
   連結：
4. 顏榮泉、陳明溥(2006)。知識擷取與社群參與導向之網路專題學習成效及互動探討。師大學報：教育類，51(2)，67-89。
   連結：
5. Bernard, R. M.,Lou, Y.,Abrami, P. C.,Wozney, L.,Borokhovski, E.,Wallet, P.(2004).How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature.Review of Educational Research,74(3),379-439.
6. Chang, W. J.,Yeh, Z. M.,Huang, G. F.(2005).A study of ocational high school students' E-learning environment of life education needs in Taiwan.Paper prestented at 2005 International conference on e-learning,Taipei:
7. Clark, H. H.,Schaefer, F. S.(1989).Contributing to discourse.Cognitive Science,13,259-294.
8. Clark, R. C.,Mayer, R. E.(2003).E-learning and the science of instruction.San Francisco, CA:Pfeiffer.
9. Creswell, J. W.(2003).Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
10. Elizondo-Montemayor, L. L.(2004).Formative and summative assessment of the problem-based learning tutorial session using a criterion-referenced system.The Journal of the International Association of Medical Science Educators,14,8-14.
11. Jonassen, D.(2000).Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
12. Klein, S. S.(1985).Handbook for achieving sex equity through education.Beltimore, MD:The John Hopkins University Press.
13. Krajcik, J. S.,Czerniak, C.,Berger, C.(1999).Teaching children science: A project-based approach.Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill College.
14. Shachar, M.,Neumann, Y.(2003).Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach.International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,4(2),1-20.
15. Stuart, H. A.(1985).Should concept maps be scored numerically?.European Journal of Science Education,7(1),73-81.
16. Torp, L.,Sage, S.(1998).Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-12 education.Virginia:Association for supervision and curriculum development.
17. Ungerleider, C.,Burns, T.(2003).A systematic review of the effectiveness and efficiency of network ICT in education: A state of the field report to the council of ministers Canada and Industry Canada.Ottawa:Industry Canada.
18. Vogel, D. R.,Davison, R. M.,Shroff, R. H.(2001).Sociocultural learning: A perspective on GSS-enabled global education.Communications of the AIS,7(9),1-40.
19. 周倩、孫春在(1996)。遠距合作學習環境之設計與建立：CORAL經驗。教學科技與媒體，26，13-21。
20. 易國良(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市，國立交通大學理學院網路學習碩士在職專班。
21. 孫春在(2000)。網路學習趨勢與原理。「網路學習理論與實務研討會」論文集，新竹市:
22. 徐西森(2003)。兩性關係與教育。臺北市:心理。
23. 殷童娟(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所。
24. 秦玉梅(1987)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育研究所。
25. 張玨(1997)。兩性平等教育的精神與目標（內涵）。「推動大專院校兩性平等教育」學術研討會，臺北市:
26. 張玨、王舒芸(1997)。兩性平等教育的挑戰與迷思。婦女與兩性通訊，43，1-3。
27. 張基成、彭星瑞(2008)。網路化檔案評量於國中電腦課程之使用及成效。師大學報：科學教育類，53(2)，31-57。
28. 陳建民(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東市，國立屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導學系。
29. 黃明娟(2001)。博士論文(博士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
30. 黃政傑(1995)。多元社會課程取向。臺北市:師大書苑。
31. 黃政傑、林佩璇(1996)。合作學習。臺北市:五南。
32. 黃德祥(1994)。青少年發展與輔導。臺北市:心理。
33. 楊淑萍(1995)。學校性教育的理念與實施。諮商與輔導，112，34-37。
34. 劉爲國(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化市，彰化師範大學工業教育學系在職進修專班。
35. 潘慧玲、黃馨慧(2005)。教育部中教司委託專案計畫成果報告教育部中教司委託專案計畫成果報告,臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。
36. 問題導向學習策略在網路化「電腦樂高」教學活動上之應用
37. 鄭崇趁、教育部主編(2000)。高中職教師兩性平等教育工作坊研習教材。臺北市:教育部。
38. 謝臥龍(1998)。規劃無性別歧視之課程與教材。兩性平等教育季刊，1，26-29。

1. 陳婉柔(2017)。問題導向學習對國中智能障礙者問題解決能力之研究。淡江大學教育科技學系數位學習碩士在職專班學位論文。2017。1-118。