Title

Attitudinal Language in Research Article Discussions: A Contrastive Study of ISI and Non-ISI Journals

DOI

10.6706/TIESPJ.2014.6.1.1

Authors

Alireza Jalilifar;Froozch Moazzen

Key Words

Attitude markers ; Appraisal theory ; Research article ; ISI journals ; Non-ISI journals

PublicationName

Taiwan International ESP Journal

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

6卷1期(2014 / 06 / 01)

Page #

1 - 30

Content Language

英文

English Abstract

This study investigated the employment of expressions of evaluative language in 169 discussion sections of Applied Linguistics English articles published in ISI and non-ISI journals. The texts were analyzed for the types of evaluative expressions by adopting the model of Appraisal suggested by Martin and Rose (2003). Results recorded significant differences between the groups regarding the expression of Attitude. Pronounced differences were mainly in the higher use of Affect and Judgment resources in ISI journals and the higher use of Appreciation in non-ISI journals. Results support the view that the universal bias towards journals listed in the ISI web of knowledge is probably fair (at least in Applied Linguistics), though more similar studies are needed to substantiate the results of the current study.

Topic Category 人文學 > 語言學
社會科學 > 教育學
Reference
  1. Testa, J. (2012). The Thomson Reuters journal selection process. Retrieved Novomber 2012 from http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/journal_selection_process
  2. White, P. R. R. (2001a). Appraisal outline: An introductory tour through appraisal theory. Retrieved February 18, 2012, from http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal.
  3. White, P. R. R. (2001b). Appraisal: An overview. Retrieved October 25, 2012, from http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal.
  4. Christie, F.(Ed.),Martin, J. R.(Ed.)(1997).Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school.London:Cassell.
  5. Coulthard, M.(Ed.)(1994).Advances in written text analysis.London:Routledge.
  6. Crismore, A.(1989).Talking with readers: Meta-discourse as rhetorical act.New York:Peter Lang.
  7. Crookes, G.(1986).Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure.Applied Linguistics,7(1),57-70.
  8. Gales, T.(2011).Identifying interpersonal stance in threatening discourse: An appraisal analysis.Discourse Studies,13(1),27-46.
  9. Halliday, M.A.K.(1994).An introduction to functional grammar.London:Edward Arnold.
  10. Holmes, R.(1997).Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of RAs discussion sections in three disciplines.English for Specific Purposes,16,321-337.
  11. Hood, S.(2010).Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing.London:Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. Hood, S.(2006).The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing.Journal of English for Academic Purposes,5,37-49.
  13. Hood, S.(2004).University of Technology, Sydney.
  14. Hunston, S.(Ed.),Thompson, G.(Ed.)(2000).Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  15. Hunston, S.,Thompson, G.(2000).Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  16. Hyland, K.(2002).Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing.Applied Linguistics,23(2),215-239.
  17. Hyland, K.(1999).Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory course books.English for Specific Purposes,18,3-26.
  18. Jalilifar, A. R.,Hayati, A. M.,Mashhadi, A.(2013).Evaluative strategies in Iranian and international research article introductions: Assessment of academic writing.Journal Research in Applied Linguistics,3(1),81-109.
  19. Jalilifar, A. R.,Savaedi, Y.(2012).The attitudinal language of presidential campaign speeches.Paper presented at the international conference on Language,Literature, and Culture,Kuala Lampur, Malaysia:
  20. Jalilifar, A.,Hayati, A. M.,Namdari, N.(2012).A comparative study of research article discussion sections of local and international applied linguistic journals.The Journal of Asia TEFL,9(1),1-29.
  21. Kanoksilapatham, B.(2005).Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles.English for Specific Purposes,24,269-292.
  22. Koustantoni, D.(2004).Attitude, certainty and allusions to common knowledge in scientific research articles.Journal of English for Academic Purposes,3(2),163-182.
  23. Lee, S.H.(2008).Attitude in undergraduate persuasive essays.Prospect,23,43-58.
  24. Lemke, J. L.(1998).Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics.Functions of Language,5(1),33-56.
  25. Lin, L.,Evans, S.(2012).Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study.English for Specific Purposes,31,150-160.
  26. Liu, X.,Thompson, P.(2009).Attitude in students' argumentative writing: A contrastive perspective.Language Studies Working Papers,1,3-15.
  27. Macken-Horaric, M.(2003).Appraisal and the special instructiveness of narrative.Text,32(2),285-312.
  28. Martin, J.(2003).Introduction, special issue on appraisal.Text Analysis,23(2),171-181.
  29. Martin, J. R.,Rose, P. R. R.(2003).Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause.London:Continuum.
  30. Martin, J. R.,White, P. R. R.(2005).The language of evaluation, appraisal in English.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  31. Mei, W.S.(2007).The use of engagement resources in high- and low-rated undergraduate geography essays.Journal of English for Academic Purposes,6,254-271.
  32. Nwogu, K. N.(1997).The medical research paper: Structure and functions.English for Specific Purposes,16,119-138.
  33. Peacock, M.(2002).Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles.System,30,479-497.
  34. Posteguillo, S.(1999).The schematic structure of computer science research articles.English for Specific Purposes,18,139-160.
  35. Ravelli, L.(Ed.),Ellis, R.(Ed.)(2004).Analyzing academic writing: Contextualized frameworks.London:Continuum.
  36. Swales, J.(1990).Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  37. Thompson, G.(2001).Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader.Applied Linguistics,22,58-78.
  38. Thompson, G.,Ye, Y.(1991).Evaluation in reporting verbs used in academic papers.Applied Linguistics,12(1),365-382.
  39. Tirkkonen-Condit, S.(1996).Explicitness vs. implicitness of argumentation: An intercultural comparison.Multilingua,15(3),257-273.
  40. Unsworth, L.(Ed.)(2000).Researching language in schools and communities:Functional linguistic perspectives.London:Cassell.
  41. White, P. R. R.(1998).University of Sydney.
  42. Yang, R.,Allison, D.(2003).Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions.English for Specific Purposes,22,365-385.