A Genre Analysis of Information and Communications Technologies Research Articles

10.6706/TIESPJ.201706_9(1).0001

Sayako Maswana；John W. Cheng

information and communications technologies ； rhetorical structures ； interdisciplinary writing

Taiwan International ESP Journal

9卷1期（2017 / 06 / 01）

1 - 25

英文

There is an increasing need for knowledge from the field of information and communications technologies (ICT) research to analyze a variety of problems across the social sciences. However, studies on research writing in ICT remain limited, in part because of this field's strong interdisciplinary nature. This paper examines the genre of research articles in the field of ICT, using 16 research articles. The study-collaboratively conducted by an applied linguist and an ICT expert-is largely based on Swales' (1990) move analysis, move coding, and investigation of the expressions of important rhetorical functions. The results show that although the examined articles do not appear to use any structure unique to this discipline, they draw from a limited range of common structures depending on the research type. The articles employ language that explicitly emphasizes the significance of the research, policy recommendations, and future work. We argue that ICT research article writing does not use any specialized interdisciplinary rhetorical structure, but focuses on communicating findings to a wider audience of readers from different disciplines. This paper also discusses pedagogical implications for ICT writing and interdisciplinary writing in general.

1. Hyland, K.(2009).Writing in the disciplines: Research evidence for specificity.Taiwan International ESP Journal,1(1),5-22.
   連結：
2. Telecommunications Policy. Retrieved March 27, 2017 from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/telecommunications-policy
3. Telematics and Informatics. Retrieved March 27, 2017 from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/telematics-and-informatics
4. Anthony, L.(1999).Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model?.IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,42(1),38-46.
5. Bammer, G.(2012).Report for the Australian Council of Learned AcademiesReport for the Australian Council of Learned Academies,未出版
6. Bhatia, V. K.(1993).Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings.London, UK:Longman.
7. Brett, P.(1994).A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles.English for Specific Purposes,13(1),47-59.
8. Cheng, A.(2008).Analyzing genre exemplars in preparation for writing: The case of an L2 graduate student in the ESP genre-based instructional framework of academic literacy.Applied Linguistics,29(1),50-71.
9. Cheng, A.(2006).Understanding learners and learning in ESP genre-based writing instruction.English for Specific Purposes,25(1),76-89.
10. Coleman, Stephen(2017).The Digital Difference: Media Technology and the Theory of Communication Effects.Journal of Communication,67(6),E7-E8.
11. Holmes, R.(1997).Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines.English for Specific Purposes,16(4),321-337.
12. Huutoniemi, K.,Klein, J. T.,Bruun, H.,Hukkinen, J.(2010).Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators.Research Policy,39(1),79-88.
13. Hyland, K.(2004).Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing.Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan Press.
14. Hyland, K.(Ed.),Bondi, M.(Ed.)(2006).Academic discourse across disciplines.Frankfurt, Germany:Peter Lang.
15. Hyland, K.,Jiang, F.(2016)."We must conclude that...": A diachronic study of academic engagement.Journal of English for Academic Purposes,24,29-42.
16. Jiang, F.,Hyland, K.(2017).Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves.English for Specific Purposes,46,1-14.
17. Kachru, B. B.(Ed.),Kachru, Y.(Ed.),Nelson, C. L.(Ed.)(2006).The Handbook of World Englishes.Oxford, UK:Blackwell Publishing.
18. Kanoksilapatham, B.(2005).Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles.English for Specific Purposes,24(3),269-292.
19. Kuteeva, M.,McGrath, L.(2015).The theoretical research article as a reflection of disciplinary practices: The case of pure mathematics.Applied Linguistics,36(2),215-235.
20. Kuteeva, M.,Negretti, R.(2016).Graduate students' genre knowledge and perceived disciplinary practices: Creating a research space across disciplines.English for Specific Purposes,41,36-49.
21. Lin, L.,Evans, S.(2012).Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A crossdisciplinary study.English for Specific Purposes,31(3),150-160.
22. Mansilla, V. B.,Duraisingh, E. D.,Wolfe, C. R.,Haynes, C.(2009).Targeted assessment rubric: An empirically grounded rubric for interdisciplinary writing.The Journal of Higher Education,80(3),334-353.
23. Newell, W. H.(2001).A theory of interdisciplinary studies.Issues in integrative studies,19(1),1-25.
24. Nwogu, K. N.(1997).The medical research paper: Structure and functions.English for Specific Purposes,16(2),119-138.
25. Ozturk, I.(2007).The textual organisation of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline.English for Specific Purposes,26(1),25-38.
26. Pan, F.,Reppen, R.,Biber, D.(2016).Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in Telecommunications research journals.Journal of English for Academic Purposes,21,60-71.
27. Posteguillo, S.(1999).The schematic structure of computer science research articles.English for Specific Purposes,18(2),139-160.
28. Swales, J. M.(1990).Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
29. Wolfe, C. R.,Haynes, C.(2003).Interdisciplinary writing assessment profiles.Issues in Integrative Studies,21,126-169.
30. Yang, R.,Allison, D.(2004).Research articles in applied linguistics: Structures from a functional perspective.English for Specific Purposes,23(3),264-279.