透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.146.35.203
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

認同衝突和政治信任:現階段台灣族群政治的核心難題

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


隨著台灣政治由威權統治轉型為民主政治,台灣的族群關係也進入不同的階段。在威權時期,族群緊張來自外省族群在政治上的宰制,以及對本土文化的壓制。源自政治的族群緊張同時也滲透入社會領域,造成本省人和外省人的社會隔離。民主化之後,政治宰制雖然不再,卻由於認同的興起和對立,族群關係進入另一個階段。本文以全國性的訪問調查資料為基礎指出:第一,雖然在母語的使用上台灣漢人有三個族群,可是在族群政治上只有兩個族群:本省人(閩南和客家)和外省人。第二,威權時期中因政治而來的族群社會隔離,經過數十年的相處以及民主化之後,已大為消弭,甚至不復存在。第三,然而,由於台灣認同的興起,本省人對外省人存有普遍的不信任感。樣本中將近半數的本省人認為外省人不夠認同台灣。這種政治上的不信任,是目前台灣族群政治的核心問題。第四,此種政治上的不信任並沒有因社會關係的融合而消弭。「社會交融、政治隔離」是目前台灣族群政治的本質。

並列摘要


The ethnic relations in Taiwan entered a new stage, as the country moved toward liberal democracy in the late 1980's. The authoritarian regime of the Kuomintang was marked by political domination by a minority group of Chinese mainlanders, whose repression of native Taiwanese local culture created political tensions and social animosity between two groups. As the transition to democracy broke down the minority's political domination, a new Taiwanese identity was also created along the process. The conflict between native Taiwanese and Chinese mainlanders upholding different identities continues to serve as the center of ethnic politics in the country. Based on the data collected from several sets of nationwide house interview surveys, this article shows, a) As far as the ethnic politics is concerned, there are only two ethnic groups in Taiwan-- native Taiwanese (including Minnan and Hokka) and Chinese mainlanders, as opposed to commonly held assertion of three ethnic groups with their own languages/dialects; b) due to the political change and social development in the past five decades, the social animosity and segregation between two groups have been greatly decreased; c) the rise of new Taiwanese identity and its conflict with the Chinese one has resulted in a widespread sense of distrust among native Taiwanese; and d) social contact (measured in terms of inter-marriage) between members of different ethnic groups has not decreased the political distrust. It appears that a combination of social assimilation and political tension best describes the nature of ethnic relations in current Taiwan.

參考文獻


駱明慶 Luoh, Ming-Ching(2001)。教育成就的省籍與性別差異。經濟論文叢刊 Taiwan Economic Review。29(2)
Allport, G. W.(1986).The Nature of Prejudice.Reading, Mass.:Addison-Wesley.
Barth, F.(1994).The Anthropology of Ethnicity: beyong 'Ethnic Groups and Boundaries'.Amsterdam:Het Spinhuis.
Belfrage, S.(1990).Freedom Summer.Charlottesville:University of Virginia Press.
Brubaker, R., Cooper, F.(2000).Beyond Identity.Theory and Society.29

被引用紀錄


盧璿之(2019)。台灣青年國家認同的自我敘說建構〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2019.00070
蔡承志(2014)。風險屬性與政治傾向對於人民幣計價基金購買意願之關聯性研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.01251
伍致翰(2012)。臺灣國家認同的變遷對兩岸關係的影響(1996~2011)〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2012.00665
林德旺(2012)。馬政府執政後大陸配偶在臺管理政策之研究(2008-2011年)〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2012.00267
翁常豪(2005)。影響台灣民眾統獨認知與統獨主張之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2005.00626

延伸閱讀