透過您的圖書館登入
IP:34.201.16.34
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

受地方限定的工廠:中國大陸內遷台資製造業勞動體制之變遷

A Place-Bound Factory: Changing Labor Regimes in Taiwanese Manufacturers to Inland China

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


過去在廣東模式的發展下,中國大陸沿海地區的外資企業—尤其是台資工廠,主要是以進城的長距離遷移農民工作為生產的主體,這些企業或工廠常使用高壓的方式進行工廠管理。雖然近來在管理方式上有某種程度的改變,但整體上仍維持「移工」勞動體制(migrant labor regime)的特徵。然而,這種刻板印象並無法充分解釋晚近,特別是2008年以後前往內陸布局設廠的台資工廠在勞動管理上的實際運作情形。本文試圖從全球生產網絡(GPNs)與Michael Burawoy對勞動體制的觀點出發,探討台資製造業廠在遷移到內陸後所發生的勞動體制的變遷及其與在地社會的關係。研究資料是2011至2015年間,研究者多次拜訪已遷移內陸的台資工廠進行田野研究所蒐集而來。這些資料主要包括田野觀察及163份與當地勞工、管理者及地方官員深入訪談的記錄。本研究發現(1)台資工廠在地理空間上的移動會促使不同行動尺度的農民工重新組合。內陸台資廠的員工大量替換為本地居民,員工的「移工」屬性因而大幅下滑;(2)台資廠遷往內陸後,勞工對工廠生產勞動的依賴度、勞動的價值觀、勞工的社會關係等,都產生相當程度的變異。內陸作為一地理尺度,具體地影響著遷移當地的台資工廠的運作;(3)遷移內陸的台資工廠,在勞動管理關係上,呈現出一個深受勞工所處(農村)社會網絡與地方(農村)經濟生活所影響的勞動體制。從鑲嵌的角度來看,這是一種領域性的鑲嵌型態,在此鑲嵌型態下的台資工廠,將無可避免地成為一個「受地方限定的」工廠。

並列摘要


Past studies on the labor regimes of foreign companies in Southern China show that there was a prevalent and coercive workplace discipline, particularly within Taiwanese factories. Even though certain changes were found in new labor management studies, labor control in these factories was still dominant, possessing the characteristics of a "migrant labor regime." This kind of labor management, however, failed to reflect the reality of the workplace within inland Taiwanese factories. This paper employs theories from Global Production Networks, as well as Michael Burawoy’s perspective regarding the factory regime, to explore the changing labor regimes of Taiwanese factories in inland China. Empirical material for this paper was generated from two phases of fieldwork, in which 163 in-depth interviews were conducted from 2011 to 2015 with Chinese employees and Taiwanese managers, as well as other research-related interviewees. It is argued that a re-combination of "two scales of action" towards rural migrant workers in inland Taiwanese factories developed as these factories moved from coastal to inland China. Instead of the past recruitment practices of long-distance migration laborers moving to coastal areas, factories mostly recruited inland employees (so-called local workers) from nearby villages and towns. These local workers showed, in many aspects, less similar characteristics to those of migrant workers in Southern China, including their conditions of dependence, moral values, and social relationships. "Inland," from this viewpoint, not only is a geographic term; it also functioned as a geographic scale, having an enormous impact on the labor regime of migrated Taiwanese factories. Factories located inland were forced to respond to workers' systematic needs, including those related to familial reproduction, seasonal farming, and community. Moreover, adjustments to the labor regime of inland Taiwanese factories brought them to become "territorially" embedded in workers' localized networks and inland rural economies. Factories thus became place-bound.

參考文獻


彭昉,2007,〈計時趕工的霸權體制:對華南一家加工出口台資廠的勞動體制研究〉。《台灣社會學》 14: 51-100。DOI: 10.6676/TS.2007.14.51
曾瑋琳、林宗弘,2012,〈解構世界工廠:台商富士康集團的全球碎裂化專制生產體制〉。論文發表於「2012年台灣社會學會年會暨『社會創新:後全球化之路』學術研討會」,台北:台灣社會學會,2012年11月24-25日。
黃德北,2006,〈資本原始積累與中國大陸的農民工〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》 61: 109-147.
鄭陸霖,1999,〈一個半邊陲的浮現與隱藏:國際鞋類市場網絡重組下的生產外移〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》35: 1-46。
Burawoy, Michael. 1976. “The Functions and Reproduction of Migrant Labor: Comparative Material from Southern Africa and the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 81(5): 1050-1087. DOI: 10.1086/226185

被引用紀錄


卓浩右(2023)。當「台式管理」遇上「靈巧的手」:墨西哥邊境工廠的勞動治理地理學報(106),79-113。https://doi.org/10.6161%2fjgs.202312_(106).0005

延伸閱讀