Title

教學方法與學習偏好對電腦輔助自然科學學習成效之影響

Translated Titles

The Learning Effects of Instructional Methods and Learning Preferences in a Computer-Assisted Science Learning Environment

DOI

10.6910/BER.200312_(49-4).0009

Authors

于富雲(Fu-Yun Yu)

Key Words

電腦輔助學習 ; 教學方法 ; 學習偏好 ; computer-assisted learning ; instructional methods ; learning preferences

PublicationName

教育研究集刊

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

49:4期(2003 / 12 / 31)

Page #

251 - 273

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本研究旨在瞭解小組合作學習、個別獨立自學以及個別競爭等三種不同教學方法以及配合學習者對教學方法偏好與否,兩自變項對國小學童電腦輔助自然科學學習成效之影響。以3 × 2二因子準實驗設計法,利用臺南市一國小五年級九個班級學生(335人)進行電腦輔助學習活動,使用學習偏好量表、兩份成就測驗及自然科態度量表收集相關資料。資料以二因子變異數統計方法分析發現,教學方法以及配合學習偏好與否兩自變項對學業成就與學科態度有交互作用。基於本研究結果建議,為提昇自然學科學業成就與學科態度,教學者在選用教學法的同時,應考量學習者對不同教學法的偏好狀態,運用不同的教學策略,以有效提昇學生的學業成就抑或學科態度。

English Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to examine the relative effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualist learning on student academic achievements and attitudes. Since matching instructional methods with individual preferences has been intuitively recommended but rarely substantiated empirically, the second purpose of this study was to explore the interactive effects of instructional methods and learners' preferences on student learning. A 3 × 2 factorial design was adopted for this study. Nine fifth-grade classes (N = 335) participated in the study for three consecutive weeks. Data were collected via "Learning Preference Scale for Students," two posttests, and a questionnaire regarding "Attitudes toward Science in School Assessment," and then analyzed by means of two-way ANOVA. It was found that there were interactive effects between instructional methods and learners' preferences with regard to student academic achievements and student attitudes toward science. In view of these findings, it was suggested that instructors should take students' learning preferences into consideration when implementing different instructional methods in science classrooms.

Topic Category 社會科學 > 教育學
Reference
  1. Bockaerts, M.,Minnaert, A.(1999).Self-regulated with respect to informal learning..International Journal of Educational research.,31
  2. Cronbach, L. J.,Snow, R. E.(1977).Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions..
  3. Daniel, E.,Gatto, M.(1996).The cooperative companion digest: Thinking about the nature and power of cooperative learning..
  4. Freitag, E. T,Sullivan, H. J.(1995).Matching learner preference to amount of instruction: An alternative form of learner control..Educational Technology Research & Development,43(2)
  5. Germann, P. J.(1988).Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school..Journal of Research in Science Teaching,25(8)
  6. Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.(1999).Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and indviduulistic learning..
  7. Johnson, R. T.,Johnson, D. W.,Stanne, M. B.(1986).Comparison of computer-assisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning..American Educational Research Journal,23(3)
  8. Johnson, R. T.,Johnson, D. W.,Stanne, M. B.(1985).Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction..Journal of Educational Psychology,77(6)
  9. Jones, E. K.,Sullivan, H. J.,Klein, J. D.(1996).The effects of matching learner preference for instructional method on achievement and attitude..
  10. Kalin, M. E.,McAvoy, R.(1973).The influence of choice on the acquisition and retention of learning materials in different modes of instruction..
  11. Klein, J. D.,Pridemore, D. R.(1992).Effects of cooperative learning and need for affiliation on performance, time on task and satisfaction..Educational Technology Research & Development,40(4)
  12. Lee, C.(1997).Cooperative learning in the thinking classroom: Research and theoretical perspectives..
  13. Lewis, R.(2002).Learning community - old and new..
  14. Lyman, L.,Foyle, H. C.,Azwell, T. S.(1993).Cooperative learning in the elementary classroom..
  15. Mager, R. F.(1964).Learner-controlled instruction..Programmed instruction,4(2)
  16. Malone, T. W.,Lepper, M. R.(1987).Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning..Aptitude, learning, and instruction:Cognitive and affective process analyses
  17. Marzano, R. J.,Pickering, D. J.,Pollock, J. E.(2001).Classroom instruction that works: Research-hased strategies for increasing student achievement..
  18. Merrill, M. D.(1980).Learner control in computer based learning..Computers and Education,4
  19. Merrill, M. D.(1975).Learner control: Beyond aptitude-treatment interactions..A V Communicutions Review,23
  20. Nastasi, B. K.,Clements, D. H.(1991).Research on cooperative learning: Implications for practice..School Psychology Review,20(1)
  21. Okebukola, P. A.(1986).The influence of preferred learning styles on cooperative learning in science..Science Education,70(5)
  22. Owen, L.(1984).Cooperation, competition, and individualization: A longitudinal study of the learning preferences of Australian primary and secondary school students..Preparation/or adulthood
  23. Owen, L.(1985).The stability of cooperative, competitive, and individualized learning preferences of students during a single school year..
  24. Owen, L.,Bames, J.(1982).The relationships between cooperative, competitive, and individualized learning preferences and students perceptions of classroom learning atmosphere..American Educational Research Journal,19
  25. Owens, L.,Barns, J.(1992).Learner preference scale..
  26. Peterson, P. L.,Janicki, T. C.(1979).Individual characteristics and children's learning in large-group and small-group approaches..Journal of Educational Psychology,71(5)
  27. Pintrich, P. R.(2000).Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement..Journal of Educational Psychology,92(3)
  28. Putnam, J. W.(1993).Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion: Celebrating diversity in the classroom..
  29. Qin, Z.(1995).Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving..Review of Educational Research,65(2)
  30. Sharan, S.(1999).Handbook of cooperative learning methods..
  31. Slavin, R. E.(1995).Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice..
  32. Snow, R, E.,Peterson, P. L.(1980).Recognizing differences in student aptitudes..New Directions for Teaching and Learning,2
  33. Sonnenwald, D. H.(2001).A research method to investigate information seeking behavior using the concept uf information horizon..
  34. Theodore, S.(1991).What do we really know about small group CBT?.
  35. Whyte, M. M.,Kmrk. F. G.,Casey. R. J.,Willard, M. L.(1990).Individualistic versus paired/cooperative computer-assisted instruction: Matching instructional method with cognitive style..Journal of Educational Technology Systems,19(4)
  36. Yu, F. Y.(2001).Competition within computer-assisted cooperative learning environments:Cognitive, affective and social outcomes..Jounal of Educational Computing Research,24(2)
  37. 余民寧(1996)。教育測驗與評量:成就測驗與教學評量
  38. 侯玫如(2002)。多重目標與測量時間對國中生認知、動機、情感、行為和學習表現之影響。
Times Cited
  1. 陳建文(2006)。不同認知風格學生接受混合式教學之學習成效分析研究─以高中「電腦網路」教學為例。臺灣師範大學工業教育學系學位論文。2006。1-105。