Translated Titles

The Effects of Marital Status on Wealth Inequality: A Trend Analysis (1988~2005)





Key Words

財富不平等 ; 婚姻地位 ; 趨勢分析 ; 性別 ; 未成年子女 ; wealth inequality ; marital status ; trend analysis ; gender ; nonage children



Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication


Academic Degree Category




Content Language


Chinese Abstract

貧富不均的現象一直是社會階層化研究關注的重要議題,過去有關經濟安全的測量是以所得為計算單位,卻忽略財富更可能是影響經濟安全的測量指標。另一方面,婚姻地位會影響財富的擁有,本研究將婚姻地位區分為已婚、未婚、離婚以及寡居四類,觀察婚姻地位的差異如何影響財富的擁有以及變化趨勢,並且考慮性別的差異以及家中有無未成年子女對於財富擁有的影響。 本研究使用行政院主計處「家庭收支調查」1988至2005年的資料,以迴歸模型以及符合重複性橫斷面設計之趨勢分析方法進行實證分析。主要發現為:一、單身者比已婚者擁有的財富較少。二、離婚女性比已婚女性擁有的財富較少。三、寡居女性與已婚女性擁有的財富差異不明顯。四、對於已婚者而言,家中有未成年子女時則擁有的財富較少。五、未婚女性與已婚女性財富擁有的差距有逐年縮小的趨勢。六、寡居者與已婚者財富擁有的差距有逐年縮小的趨勢。七、離婚女性與已婚女性財富擁有的差距有逐年縮小的趨勢。 本研究作為台灣財富不平等的初探性研究,比較婚姻地位的差異如何影響財富的擁有以及長期趨勢分析,並且提出本研究之限制以及對未來後續研究之建議。

English Abstract

The disparity between rich and poor is always an important issue in the social stratification field. In the past, exports focused on income, one of the factor of the economy security, but overlooked the neglecting wealth can be a more powerful indicator. On the other hand, marital status could also affect the owning of the wealth. In this study, the researcher divided the marital status in four different catalogs, which are married, single, divorced, and remained. And trying to find dissimilarities of these four catalogs that may influence the owning of wealth and the changing trend, considering the gender differences and having nonage children that affect the wealth. This study uses data which named “The Survey of Family Income and Expenditure” in 1988 to 2005 from Directorate General of Budget, Accounting & Statistics. And do the analysis with regression model and the trend analysis which match the repeated cross-sectional design. Seven main discoveries are as follows. First, the single compared married own less wealth. Second, divorced female compared married female own less wealth. Third, the differences of wealth between remained female and married female are not obvious. Fourth, married people have less wealth when there have nonage children in the house. Fifth, the trend of wealth between the single female and married female is becoming convergence year by year. Sixth, the trend of wealth between the remained people and married people is becoming convergence year by year. Seventh, the trend of wealth between divorced female and married female is becoming convergence year by year. This study is the preliminary study of wealth inequality research in Taiwan, comparing how the marital status influence the owning of wealth and long-term trend analysis, and put forward the restriction of this study and the suggestion of future study.

Topic Category 社會科學院 > 社會學研究所
社會科學 > 社會學
  1. Bryk, A. S. and S. W. Raudenbush (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA, Sage.
  2. David, M. and P. Menchik (1988). "Changes in cohort wealth over a generation." Demography 25: 317-335.
  3. Deere, C. D. and C. R. Doss (2006). "The Gender Asset Gap: What Do We Know and Why Does It Matter?" Feminist Economics 12(1-2): 1-50.
  4. DiPrete, T. A. and D. B. Grusky (1990). The multilevel analysis of trends with repeated cross-sectional data. Sociological Methodology 1990. C. C. Clogg. Oxford, UK, Basil Blackwell: 337-368.
  5. Duncan, G. and S. Hoffman (1985). "A Reconsideration of the Economic Consequences of Divorce." Demography 22(3): 485-497.
  6. Firebaugh, G. (1997). Analyzing Repeated Surveys, Sara Miller McCune, Sage Publications, Inc.
  7. Gary N. Marks , B. H., Mark Wooden (2005). "Household wealth in Australia--Its components, distribution and correlates." Journal of Sociology 41(1): 47-68.
  8. Gerth, H. H. and C. W. Mills (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York, Oxford University Press.
  9. Holden, K. C. and D. H. Kuo (1996). "Complex marital histories and economic well-being: The continuing legacy of divorce and widowhood as the HRS cohort approaches retirement." The Gerontologist 36: 383-390.
  10. Keister, L. A. (2000a). "Race and Wealth Inequality: The Impact of Racial Differences in Asset Ownership on the Distribution of Household Wealth." Social Science Research 29(477-502).
  11. Keister, L. A. (2000b). Wealth in America:trends in wealth inequality. UK, Cambridge University Press.
  12. Keister, L. A. (2003). "Sharing the Wealth: The Effect of Siblings on Adult's Ownership." Demography 40(3): 521-542.
  13. Keister, L. A. and S. Moller (2000). "Wealth Inequality In The United States." Annual Review of Sociology 26: 63-81.
  14. Kennickell, A. B. and M. Starr-McCluer (1997). "Household saving and profolio change: evidence from the 1983-89 SCF Panel." Review of Income and Wealth Dec: 381-399.
  15. King, M. A. and L.-D. Dicks-Mireaux (1982). "Asset holdings and the life-cycle." Economical Journal 92: 247-267.
  16. Korczyk, S. (1998). How Americans Save. Washington, DC, American Assosiation for Retired Persons.
  17. Lerman, D. L. and J. J. Mikesell (1988). "Rural and urban poverty: an income/net worth appoach " Policy Study Reviews 7: 765-781.
  18. Marks, G. N., B. Headey, et al. (2005). "Household wealth in Australia: Its components, distribution and correlates." Journal of Sociology 41(1): 47-68.
  19. Oliver, M. L. and T. M. Shapiro (1995). Black Wealth/White Wealth New York, Routledge.
  20. Oppenheimer, V. (1988). "A Theory of Marriage Timing." American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563-591.
  21. Osberg, L. (1984). Economic Inequality in the United States. New York, Sharpe.
  22. Podder, N. and N. C. Kakwani (1976). "Distribution of Wealth in Australia." Review of Income and Wealth 22(1): 75-92.
  23. Schmidt, L. and P. Sevak (2006). "Gender, Marriage, and Asset Accumulation in the United States." Feminist Economics 12(1-2): 139-166.
  24. Smith, J. P. (1995). "Racial and ethnic differences in the health and retirement study." The Journal of Human Resources 30: S158-S183.
  25. Spilerman, S. (2000). "Wealth and Stratification Processes." Annual Review of Sociology 26: 497-524.
  26. Tam, T. (1997). "Sex Segregation and occupational Gender Inequality in the United States: Devaluation or Specialized Training?" American Journal of Sociology 102(6): 1652-92.
  27. Torrey, B. B. and C. Taeuber (1986). "The importance of asset income among the elderly " Review of Income and Wealth 4: 443-449.
  28. Waite, L. (1995). "Does Marriage Matter?" Demography 32(4): 483-507.
  29. Weitzman, L. (1985). The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America. New York, Free Press.
  30. White, L. A. S. J. R. (2000). "Economic Circumstances and Family Outcomes: A Review of the 1990s." Fournal of Marriage and the Family 64(2): 1035-1051.
  31. Wilmoth, J. and G. Koso (2002). "Does Marital History Matter? Marital Status and Wealth Outcomes Among Preretirement Adults." Journal of Marriage and Family 64: 254-268.
  32. Wolff, E. N. (1994). "Trends in household wealth in the United States, 1962-83 and 1983-89." Review of Income and Wealth 40: 143-174.
  33. Wolff, E. N. (1995b). Top Heavy: A Study of the Increasing Inequality of Wealth in America. New York, Twentieth Century Fund.
  34. Wright, E. O. (1979). Class Structure and Income Determination. New York, Academic Press.
  35. Yamokoski, A. and L. A. Keister (2006). "The Wealth of Single Women: Marital Status and Parenthood in the Asset Accumulation of Young Baby Boomers in the United States." Feminist Economics 12(1-2): 167-194.
  36. Zagorsky, J. L. (2005). "Marriage and Divorce's Impact on Wealth." Journal of Sociology 41(4): 406-424.
  37. Zick, C. D. and K. Holden (2000). "An Assessment of the Wealth Holdings of Recent Widows." Journal of Gerontology: SOCIAL SCIENCES 55B(2): S90-S97.
  38. 行政院主計處 (2005). 94年家庭收支調查報告.
  39. 英文文獻
  40. Becker, G. S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.
  41. Bucks, B. K., A. B. Kennickell, et al. (2006). "Recent Changes in U.S. Family Finances: Evidence from the 2001 and 2004 Survey of Consumer Finances." Federal Reserve Bulletin: pA1-A38.
  42. Dalaker, J. and M. Naifeh (1998). Poverty in the United States: 1997(Current Population Reports, Series P60-201). Washington, DC, US Bureau of the Census.
  43. Hurd, M. D. and G. Mundaca (1989). The importance of gifts and inheritance among the affluent. The Measurement of Saving, Investment, and Wealth. R. E. Lipsey and H. S. Tice. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  44. Hurd, M. D. and D. A. Wise (1989). The wealth and poverty of widows: Assets before and after the husband's death. The economics of aging D. A. Wiseicago. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press: 177-200.
  45. Kelly, S. (2001). Trends in Australian Wealth: New Estimates for the 1990s. 30th Annual Conference of Economists. University of Western Australia.
  46. Levine, P. B., O. S. Mitchell, et al. (2000). Women on the Verge of Retirement: Predictors of Retiree Welbeing. Forecasting Retirement Needs and Retirement Wealth. O. S. Mitchell, P. B. Hammond and A. M. Rappaport. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press: 167-207.
  47. Lupton, J. and J. Smith (2002). Marriage, Assets and Savings. Marriage and the Economy: Theory and Evidence from Advanced Industrial Societies. S. Grossbard-Shechtman. New York and Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 129-152.
  48. Menard, S. (1991). Longitudinal Research, Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences.
  49. Mirer, T. W. (1979). "The wealth-age relation among the aged." American Economic Review 69: 435-443.
  50. Radner, D. B. (1993). "Economic well-being of the old old: Family unit income and household wealth." Social Security Bulletin 59: 3-19.
  51. Rodriguez, S. B., J. Diaz-Gimenez, V. Quadrini and J.-V. Rios-Rull (2002). "New Facts on the Distributions of Earnings, Income and Wealth in the US." Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review (summer): 1-34.
  52. Tsai, S.-L. and C.-C. Mai (1998). "Earning Inequality in Taiwan:1980-1992." Proceedings of the National Science Council (Part C:Humanities and Social Sciences) 8(4): 706-718.
  53. Wolff, E. N. (1995a). The rich get ncreasingly richer:latest data on household wealth during the 1980s. Research in Politics and Society. R. Ratcliff, M. Oliver and T. Shapiro. Greenwich, CT:JAI: 33-68.
  54. Wooldridge, J. M. (2000). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, South-Western College.
  55. Yu, W.-H. and K.-H. Su (2004). On One's Own: Self-employment Activity in Taiwan. The Reemergence of Self-employment: a Comparative Study of Self-employment Dynamics and Social Inequality. R. Arum and W. Mueller. Princeton, Princeton University Press: 388-425.
  56. 中文文獻
  57. 毛維凌 (1994). "國民財富累積、移轉與分配." 主計月報 75(4): 38-47.
  58. 宋增欽 (1993). "從國富調查衡量家庭財富分配." 主計月報 75(3): 6-14.
  59. 張雲澐、陳艷秋 (2005). "家庭財富差距衡量方法之研究." 主計月刊 589: 6-11.
  60. 許秉翔 (2002). 當前台灣住宅的代間移轉. 建築與城鄉研究所. 台北, 國立臺灣大學. 博士論文.
  61. 陳慧圈 (1997). 影響台灣所得分配之因素的探討─兼論台灣的財富分配. 國際經濟研究所. 嘉義, 國立中正大學. 博士論文.
  62. 曾敏傑 (2001). "台灣地區兩性薪資差異與變遷:1982、1992、及2000年的比較." 人口學刊 23: 147-209.
  63. 黃旭明 (1994). "防止貧富差距擴大之研究(上)." 主計月報 7(1): 3-8.
  64. 蔡文松 (2004). 財富分配之理論研析與實際-以台灣國富調查為例. 經濟學研究所. 台北, 國立政治大學. 碩士論文.
  65. 薛承泰 (2003). 台灣地區婚姻的變遷與社會衝擊. 國政研究報告, 財團法人國家政策研究基金會.
Times Cited
  1. 李珠琦(2016)。臺灣婚姻循環的所得重分配效果分析。逢甲大學財稅學系學位論文。2016。1-62。