建築工程設計品質評量指標之研究

The research about the index of design quality for building projects

蔡弘祥(Hung-Hsiang Tsai)

指導教授 ： 曾惠斌

國立臺灣大學/工學院/土木工程學研究所/碩士(2005年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.00266

摘要

工程生命週期歷經大致分為可行性研究、規劃、設計、施工、使用維護等階段，每一階段之執行情況對工程之功能均有重大之影響。工程之設計周延與否，影響工程施工、完工及營運管理，因此在設計階段時應非常謹慎。而施工階段原則上應照設計階段之要求，按有關之工程契約文件(含工程圖說、規範)及有關規定進行施工；故工程最後之實際功能與品質，受設計品質影響甚鉅。
工程會為提升公共工程品質，自八十二年起推動三級品管制度，辦理優良工程品質評審，並於八十九年度開始頒發公共工程金質獎，表揚優良公共工程之機關、施工廠商及個人。由於獎項發給對象著重於施工階段之工程，對於設計單位之評審指標未予明訂。本研究擬配合原來金質獎作業，以公部門查核單位為立場，以施工查核作業中回饋廠商設計品質評量指標的建立為重要課題深入探討，期能提供機關業主與承辦人員於辦理建築工程設計品質評量時之參考。
為了使查核作業能順利進行，本研究建立了一套完整的建築工程設計品質評量之具體指標與查核表，希望藉由施工查核階段之查核作業回饋工程設計成果之品質，藉以提高機關及技術服務廠商對於工程設計品質之重視。
本研究先經由文獻、案例分析與專家訪談彙整重要評量因子，再進行態度量表問卷調查方式與嚴謹之統計檢定考驗，將個人主觀感覺加以客觀化，彙集諸多具設計評量經驗之專家學者對細項的重視程度，以合理研擬出一般性建築工程設計品質評量指標之層級式架構。希望藉由對建築工程設計品質評量指標的建立，提供國內各公共工程相關單位對設計品質評量之參考，進而加強對工程設計品質之落實，以期能達到提升公共工程品質的目的。

關鍵字

建築工程 ； 設計品質 ； 評量指標 ； 統計分析

並列摘要

The life cycle of constructions could be divided into different stages, for example: feasibility study, planning, detail design, executing and maintenance. Each stage had its influence in the construction. The quality of planning and detail design output data would extremely influence the quality of construction executing, closing stages and operating service, therefore, it should be very prudent during design state. In principle, the stage of constructing should construct according to the request of design phase. So the actual function and quality of the project are large influenced by the quality of designing.

In order to improve public project quality, the government (PCC, Public Construction Committee) promoting three level quality management systems, and handling the quality evaluation of fine project since 1993; and begin to award the public project gold medal award since 2000, which is in order to praise organization, construction manufacturer and individual of the fine public project. Because the awards focuses on the project during the stage of constructing, and the evaluation index to the designing unit has not been stipulated clearly yet, this research plans to cooperate with the gold medal award work, in the position of the public checking unit, to set up the index of design quality, and be able to offer an owner and undertaker while handling the evaluation of building design quality.

To enable the checking work easily, this research have set up an index of project design quality of building and check list. Hope it could feedback the project design quality by checking work in the constructing phase, and to improve the attention to project design quality of the organization and technological service company.

The research gathering the whole important evaluating factor by literature review, case analysis and expert interview, and then carry on attitude form questionnaire investigation and rigorous statistics to assay and test, objectifying the personal subjective feeling. Gathering a great deal of experts and scholars who experienced in design quality, to set up a general index to evaluate the design quality of the building project rationally. Hope by setting up the index to the design quality of the building project, offering the reference to every domestic public relevant unit so as to evaluate the project design quality, and then strengthening the implementation of project design quality, and expecting to achieve the goal of improving public project quality.

並列關鍵字

Building project ； Designing quality ； Evaluating index ； Statistical analysis

參考文獻

16. 謝浩明、吳桂陽，「建設公司全面品質管理與專案規劃績效之研究」，建築學報第33期，2000年7月，第15頁~第32頁。

20. 行政院公共工程委員會，「公共工程管理法令彙編」，2003。

43. 張博森，「公共建築工程統包PCM 設計管理之研究」，國立成功大學建築學系碩士論文，2004。

31. 邱文杰，「施工專案績效指標與機制之建立」，國立成功大學土木工程學系碩士論文，2002，第12頁。

2. Ahmed Mokhtar,Claude Bedard, and Paul Fazio, “Information Model for Managing Design Changes in a Collaborative Environment”, journal of computing in civil engineering, p.82, April 1998.