Title

台灣傳統紡織產業之策略佈局-以E公司為例

Translated Titles

Strategic Implementation of Taiwanese Traditional Textile Industry: A Case Study

Authors

郭曉玲

Key Words

紡織服飾產業 ; 競爭優勢 ; 企業經營疆界 ; 垂直分工 ; 品牌策略 ; Textile and Apparel Industry ; Competitive Advantage ; Corporate Boundary ; Vertical Integration ; Branding Strategy

PublicationName

臺灣大學國際企業學研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2012年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

湯明哲

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

紡織服飾產業曾是帶領台灣大量創匯之功臣,如今卻被貼上「夕陽產業」之標籤。然而,伴隨著收入與生活水準提高,全球主要消費市場之體育運動風氣日益興盛,亦逐漸帶動一般消費者對於運動休閒服飾品的需求。鑒於近年總體環境、消費型態、政策法規等轉變,企業如何以資源作效率性運用,與時調整策略定位,建構競爭優勢並掌握未來機會,達成永續經營之目標乃此研究欲探討之議題。   本研究為一探索性的研究,採用質性研究法中的個案研究法。以深度訪談的方式,針對供應鏈管理、合作夥伴關係、事件影響與品牌行銷方面問題,蒐集整理個案公司的各種初級與次級相關資料,了解個案公司實際上的考量。研究中透過整體環境與競爭者的概述,針對目前環境之趨勢與競爭壓力對於企業策略定位影響做探討,並藉由競爭者分析觀察可能決定紡織服飾企業最終表現之要素。以交易成本理論與資源基礎理論分析個案對象:如何進行策略布局以及決定企業之疆界,建構、深耕與維持其競爭優勢。 本研究結果針對個案公司經營疆界的決定要素歸納出五種層面:技術、產業特性、彈性需求、利益衝突問題、產品關鍵價值來源。透過垂直整合的方式,可以讓企業接單、採購、發單、生產模式等營運更具效率性、降低風險與交易成本,對於客戶而言,則提高了產品之附加價值。而從資源基礎觀點分析個案公司於總體環境危機之後迅速成長之影響因子,主要可歸因於其能有效運用轉換資源能力,以對外在環境潛在威脅與競爭壓力做好回應與適當之策略定位。其競爭優勢包括:深耕研發技術、一貫化服務、穩健之營運模式、客戶選擇與產品定位。   本研究指出接觸消費者、創造需求,為未來紡織服飾市場之趨勢,欲降低競爭壓力、提高產品溢價與利潤與支持企業永續經營,品牌策略或為台灣紡織業者須思考之方向。然而,其中之考量與利弊,本研究得出以下主要結論與建議:(1)若欲往下游品牌通路市場發展,建議中上游供應商新建立一新的企業來經營,以避免客戶利益與企業內部經營模式差異之衝突。而穩健之營運模式與技術條件為發展下游品牌通路之要件。(2)若欲往上游機能布品牌發展,中小企業缺乏龐大資金來源與後援設備與應變支援,較不建議往上游機能布品牌發展。此外,若欲發展機能布品牌,建議朝尚未有既定領導品牌之利基市場發展,且須與供應鏈各區段夥伴建立某一特定合夥關係。   整體而言,在產品多元化與市場情境急遽變動的時代,具備快速轉換資源能力,掌握競爭優勢者,隨時觀察市場產業環境動態而調整策略定位,即能前瞻性地抓住未來機會,搶占未來市場份額。

English Abstract

Once textile industry brought huge foreign exchange earning to Taiwanese though, it is entitled “Sunset Industry” in Taiwan recently. On the other hand, with the improvement of income and living standard and the prosperity of sport trend, the demand for sport and leisure apparel becomes stronger among athletes and general consumers. In light of radical transformation in macro environment, consumption style, and policy and regulations, the study would like to explore and discuss how corporate could efficiently turn its resources into required capabilities, adjust its strategic position with time, build competitive advantage and preempt future opportunities in order to reach the objective of sustainable development.   The study is an exploratory research, adopting qualitative approach and using case study method. Through an in-depth interview, the study attempts to understand the practical considerations of the corporation regarding strategic decisions and behaviors of supply chain management, cooperative partner relationship, event effect, and brand marketing. On the one hand, by selecting initial and secondary information, the study explores the effect of macro environment trend on corporate strategic positioning; on the other hand, the study discusses the possible determinants of corporate performance through competitors DuPont analysis. In terms of TCE and RBV, the study attempts to observe and analyze how the case company decides their corporate boundary, build and sustain their competitive advantage. And finally, the study provides some thinking directions and suggestions for the strategic action of the textile corporation in the future. The study finds that there are at least five dimensions determine the corporate boundary: technology, industrial feature, demand for flexibility, interest conflict problems, and the key value source of product. Through vertical integration, corporate can make their ordering, purchasing, and manufacturing mode operate more efficiently and reduce risk and transaction cost. And the one-stop service provided through vertical integration can enhance product value for the customers. In the view of RBV, the factors that determine the amazing growth of case company after economic crisis lie in their ability to effectively turn resources to capabilities and to preempt an appropriate strategic position beforehand. By organizing firm-specific capabilities, the case company builds four competitive advantages: in-depth know-how and technology, all-in-one supply service, stable and strong operation mode, and specific customer and product profile. The study points out that connecting to consumers and creating demand will be the future trend of apparel market. In order to eliminate the competitive pressure, Taiwanese textile corporate cannot help but consider brand strategy as one approach which is more likely increase product premium and margin and support the sustainable development of the corporation. Finally, the study has the following outcome and suggestions: (1) In avoid of potential conflict problems with existing customers and within-company operation, it is suggested to build a new individual business to operate the downward brand management. In addition, the stable operation mode and strong technology condition are the necessities for the downward brand development. (2) Since it requires huge capital and sufficient support from updated facilities and business units, SMEs are not suggested to develop branding business. And the corporate is suggested to enter in the niche market where no dominant brand exists if the corporate would like to develop component branding in textile market. In addition, to build a specific mechanism and relationship with partners in the supply chain is critical for the component branding management. Above all, in the era of product diversity and radically changing market, the corporate that possesses effective transferability of organization resource to capability, commands competitive advantages, and dynamically adjust strategic position with external environment can have better chance to preempt future opportunities and to dominate the future market share.

Topic Category 管理學院 > 國際企業學研究所
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 工業技術研究院,2010,紡織產業報告-全球創新招商計畫簡報,台北:工業技術研究院。
    連結:
  2. 李信宏,2011, 2011年紡織產業回顧與展望,台北: 紡織綜合所 ITIS智網。
    連結:
  3. 陳永雄,2011,台灣紡織業的發展與競爭力研究,國立台灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班會計與管理決策組碩士論文。
    連結:
  4. 儒鴻企業股份有限公司,2011,「儒鴻企業九十九年度年報」。
    連結:
  5. Aaker, D.A., 1989. Managing assets and skills: The key to a sustainable competitive advantage. California Management Review, 91-106.
    連結:
  6. Aaker, D.A., & Keller, K.L. 1990. Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54 : 27–41.
    連結:
  7. Afuah, A. 2001. Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change? Academy of Management Journal, 44(6): 1211-1228.
    連結:
  8. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
    連結:
  9. Cachon, G. P., & Swinney, R. 2009. Purchasing, pricing, and quick response in the presence of strategic consumers. Management Science, 55(3): 497–511.
    連結:
  10. Cachon, G. P., & Swinney, R. 2011. The value of fast fashion: Quick response, enhanced design, and strategic consumer behavior. Management Science, 57(4) :778–795.
    連結:
  11. Caro, F., & Gallien, J. 2010. Inventory management of a fast-fashion retail network. Operations Research, 58(2): 257-273.
    連結:
  12. Caro, F., & Martinez de Albeniz, V. 2010. The impact of quick response in inventory-based competition. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 12(3): 409-429.
    連結:
  13. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. 2005. Blue ocean strategy. How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    連結:
  14. Lee, Yan-Zan & Lo, Yuan-Ming. 2002. The reasons for post-issue operating performance decline of IPO firms. Journal of Financial Studies, 10 (1): 23-52.
    連結:
  15. Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.
    連結:
  16. Porter, M. 1980. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
    連結:
  17. Porter, M. 1985. Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.
    連結:
  18. Prahalad, C.K., & Bettis, Richard A. 1986. The dominant logic: a new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7:485-501.
    連結:
  19. Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3):79-91.
    連結:
  20. Rohwedder, C., & Johnson, K. 2008. Pace-setting Zara seeks more speed to flight its rising cheap-chic rivals. The Wall Street Journal.
    連結:
  21. Williamson, O. 1975. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
    連結:
  22. 一、中文文獻
  23. 丁正中,2001,「紡織產業經營與展望研討會」記要,金融聯合徵信中心,http://www.jcic.org.tw/publish/020604.doc,搜尋日期:2012年6月。
  24. 大前研一,2006,初版,M型社會,台灣:商周出版。
  25. 中國紡織工業研究中心,2000,功能性紡織品專題調查報告,台北:中國紡織工業研究中心。
  26. 中國紡織工業研究中心,2003,台灣運動休閒服飾品全球運籌策略研究,台北:中國紡織工業研究中心。
  27. 中華民國紡織業拓展會,2007,機能性紡織品競爭力與市場發展分析(外觀變化機能),中華民國紡織業拓展會。
  28. 中華經濟研究院,2005,台灣產業全球布局對策研究(編號:(94)039.113),台北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
  29. 行政院經濟建設委員會主委專文,2012,「來一波傳統產業維新運動!」,行政院經濟建設委員會,http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0016624,搜尋日期:2012年5月。
  30. 巫佳怡,2010,全球機能性運動服飾產業市場分析,台灣:紡織產業綜合研究所。
  31. 吳沛綺,2009,綠色供應鏈管理之探討-以國內電子與紡織產業為例,國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
  32. 林士雄,2011,機能性紡織品聯合品牌之研究―以GORE-TEX®布料為例,私立輔仁大學織品服裝學系碩士論文。
  33. 柯玥寧,2011,「洪鎮海 用創意編織商機」,經濟日報,11月7日。
  34. 洪輝嵩,2010,紡織業應用資通訊(ICT)新商業模式研究(報告書編號:98005),台北:經濟部工業局。
  35. 韋樞,2012,「【專訪】師法自然 宏遠不怕電費漲」,中央社,4月22日。
  36. 紡拓會市場拓展處,2010,「機能性紡織產業之永續發展-緒論」,Taiwan Textile Monthly紡織月刊,167期:50-55。
  37. 紡拓會產經資訊處,2011,英威達擴大Lycra beauty布料認證計畫,台北:紡拓會。
  38. 紡拓會產經資訊處,2012,台、韓紡織成衣產業出口比較,台北:紡拓會。
  39. 紡織產業綜合研究所,2010,兩岸機能性紡織品優勢互補之探討,台北:紡織產業綜合研究所。
  40. 唐瓔璋、吳敏華、彭宜君,2009,「品牌對零售商價格促銷策略調節效果之研究」,中華管理評論國際學報,12卷4期。
  41. 許博凱,2010,中間財企業的事業系統策略:GORE公司的個案研究,私立東海大學工業工程與經營資訊學系碩士論文。
  42. 黃亦筠,2008,「台灣機能布 走上品牌路」,天下雜誌399期,6月18日。
  43. 陳介英,2007,初版,牽紗引線話紡織: 台灣紡織產業發展史,高雄:國立科學工藝博物館。
  44. 陳長榮、陳建榮,2012,晨會報告-聚陽,台北:日盛投顧。
  45. 陳榮宏,2009,「機能性紡織品於運動休閒用服飾的應用與分析」,台灣人纖工業會訊,62期:62-71。
  46. 陳麒元,2011,「台灣服務業聯網專題分析-台灣服飾業通路之變化與趨勢」,http://www.twcsi.org.tw/columnpage/expert/e155.aspx,搜尋日期:2012年6月。
  47. 傅恒聿,2012,公司訪談報告-聚陽,台北:元富投顧。
  48. 群益投顧,2012,研究報告-儒鴻,台北:群益投顧。
  49. 經濟部技術處,2007,全球運籌管理電子化-紡織成功導入個案集,台北:經濟部技術處。
  50. 經濟部投資業務處,2008,台灣紡織產業產業分析與投資機會,台北,經濟部投資業務處。
  51. 經濟部工業局,2009,「紡織產業現況與輔導措施簡報」,http://www.cnfi.org.tw/wto/admin/upload/35/ECFA507.pdf,搜尋日期:2012年5月。
  52. 經濟部技術處,2011,「紡織科技」,產業技術白皮書,產業篇 標題肆:民生福祉領域 第二章。
  53. 閩潔,2010,後金融海嘯台灣紡織產業的發展方向,台北:紡織產業綜合研究所。
  54. 閩潔、李信宏、巫佳怡、謝沛茹,2011,紡織產業年鑑,台北:紡織產業綜合研究所。
  55. 绿色和平國際出版,2011,时尚之毒-全球服装品牌的中国水污染调查,北京:绿色和平组织。
  56. 劉育呈,2009,從全球金融海嘯檢視紡織產業,台北:紡織產業綜合研究所。
  57. 劉育呈,2010,「機能性紡織品市場及發展趨勢分析」,紡織速報,18卷5期:頁31-35。
  58. 劉芳妙,2009,「逆境求勝》儒鴻 少量多樣 站穩利基」,經濟日報,3月17日。
  59. 劉慧玉譯,2007,初版,女人撐起半邊天 : 亞洲女性消費力報告,台北: 財訊出版公司。Yuwa Hedrick-Wong,2006,Holding Up Half of the Sky:The New Women Consumers of Asia. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  60. 二、英文文獻
  61. Grant, Robert M. 2009. Contemporary strategy analysis (6th ed). New York: John Wiley& Sons.
  62. Hamel, G., & Heene, A. 1994. Competence based competition. New York : Wiley.
  63. Passariello, C. 2008. Logistics are in vogue with designers-as slump threatens luxury goods, systems to track consumer tastes and tweak offerings win converts. The Wall Street Journal.
  64. Penman, J. 2002.Textile branding. Global Fibers and Feedstocks Report: Special Focus, 14:11-14. Manchester, UK: David Rigby Associates.
  65. Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. 1994. Competing for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Times Cited
  1. 劉萍雲(2014)。上班族機能服飾企業市場行銷策略之研究-以衣十五為例。中山大學高階經營碩士班學位論文。2014。1-55。